Page 2 of 2
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 10:21 am
by RobertJasiek
The purpose of correcting users is the attempt of making this forum one with a higher percentage of correct contents messages. Such is fundamentally important in Go. By avoiding mistakes, we become stronger.
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 12:08 pm
by xed_over
Jordus wrote:RobertJasiek wrote:IMO, a 1 to 5 "star" ranking system has these disadvantages:
1) 1 as the minimum can be confused with expressing something positive.
AFAIK, it is common knowledge that in a standard 1-5 ranking system that 1 is referred to as bad and 5 as good. We can thank amazon.com for that one...
I tend to agree with Robert on this point, and exactly because of Amazon.
Whenever I've attempted to rate an Amazon purchase with a poor rating, they still try to recommend similar books, as if I had given it some positive rating.
And for a while, they had no ability to remove a rating (Netflix has this same problem now).
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 12:36 pm
by kirkmc
xed_over wrote:
Whenever I've attempted to rate an Amazon purchase with a poor rating, they still try to recommend similar books, as if I had given it some positive rating.
I don't think they're recommending based on your rating, but rather based on the fact that you've purchased it.
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:41 pm
by Joaz Banbeck
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:18 pm
by LocoRon
I rate this new ratings system:
5
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:11 pm
by Dusk Eagle
Horrible idea.
--
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:21 pm
by xed_over
kirkmc wrote:xed_over wrote:
Whenever I've attempted to rate an Amazon purchase with a poor rating, they still try to recommend similar books, as if I had given it some positive rating.
I don't think they're recommending based on your rating, but rather based on the fact that you've purchased it.
purchased, not purchased, own, don't own -- it doesn't matter. If you touch a star, they think you're interested in it, and they say so when you follow the "why was this recommended?" link.
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:24 pm
by Jordus
xed_over wrote:purchased, not purchased, own, don't own -- it doesn't matter. If you touch a star, they think you're interested in it, and they say so when you follow the "why was this recommended?" link.
It isn't touching the star that does it. Viewing the item puts it on the list. I view something and I get recommendations for like products. But that is just corporate advertising and sales at its best...
Re: Rating system bbcode
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:32 pm
by rjcord
A thumb up,

, neutral

or thumbdown

would work for me. But for book reviews, what's recommended for beginners wouldn't be recommended for strong dan players so reducing a recommendation to one dimension is alway problematical.