Page 2 of 3
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 10:47 pm
by shapenaji
As far as recommendations, on the list of recently played games, it's not always easy to see which was the winning player, there's a column for which color won, but the eye can lose focus, looking back and forth, maybe just also put the winning player's name in bold type?
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:07 am
by msgreg
Great work!! I agree that the design is nice and simple.
A few functional issues:
"search for player" goes to a list of players with no search option. Result is ordered by Descending ID.
"Next" on "/player/" page doesn't work (just goes to same page). It would be nice to have page control links in addition to "Next" (i.e. First...5 6 7...Last Next"
Ideas
-----
Unless there's a db load issue that makes the front page "Last 180 Games" display more efficient, why not just rename it to "Most Recent Games" and unlimit the date range? It already has page controls to limit the results.
Put a search box next to the "Recent Tournaments" title to allow searching by name or (beginning) date (auto detect search type). Textbox internal text: "Title or yyyy/mm/dd".
Put the "Search for Player" search box next to the "Recent Games" and allow search by name, id, or (beginning) date (auto detect search type).
(internally, either execute a combined query or decide on the query based on whether it's a number or not or date formatted, be sure to specify mm/dd/yyyy, yyyy/mm/dd, or preferred date format in the label or disappearing internal text "Search Name, ID, or yyyy/mm/dd").
If a page control is selected, dispense with the other table. I.e. if "Next" on game list is selected, don't bother displaying any tournament results, and if "Next" on tournament list is selected, don't bother displaying any specific game results.
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:18 am
by LocoRon
shapenaji wrote:As far as recommendations, on the list of recently played games, it's not always easy to see which was the winning player, there's a column for which color won, but the eye can lose focus, looking back and forth, maybe just also put the winning player's name in bold type?
Yeah, following the table row can be a bit difficult at times. Rather than bolding some element or another (am I the only one that occasionally has trouble seeing bold?), my favorite solution is to highlight the row when you hover over it. It also happens to be ridiculously simple to implement in CSS, and will help for tracking any other info that might be in the row.
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:32 am
by gurujeet
Wow this is great progress! Love the historical rank graph.
One thing the previous version had was tournament cross-tabs. Is that coming back? It was nice to be able to browse tournament results and then click on individual players.
Keep up the great work!
- gurujeet
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:44 am
by gurujeet
Oh I see the tournament crosstabs, nice. I see how you can go from tournament to player, but don't see a way to jump back from player to tournament which would be nice too.
- gurujeet
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:47 am
by seigenblues
Thanks for the feedback, guys!
LocoRon wrote:Yeah, following the table row can be a bit difficult at times.
Fixed!
shapenaji wrote:maybe just also put the winning player's name in bold type?
This'll happen tonight.
Msgreg, the search functionality was busted due to user-error on my part. I want to add more options (state, chapter), but for now it just uses "any name matching '...' "
And of course, it's not even 500 lines of python code yet, so, feel free to jump in!
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:13 am
by shapenaji
There's a huge problem here. Front and center on my most played opponents is my perfect loss rate against Daniel Chou, your code is reminding me of my failures!
As far as feature requests, what's the feasibility of throwing up other interesting stats, like those in KGS analytics? Or even, just giving us an SQL query prompt, so that we can ask our own questions of the database?
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:47 am
by seigenblues
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:57 am
by hyperpape
Feasability of a download/torrent of the database (minus any private information that might be present)?
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:28 am
by vash3g
hyperpape wrote:Feasability of a download/torrent of the database (minus any private information that might be present)?
At this point there is no possibility to release the database data outside of the AGAGD. This may change in the future but it would right now it is not an available option.
--AGA Server Admin
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:33 pm
by EricBackus
Thank you! I've wanted this ability for awhile, since my impression is that the AGAGD doesn't account for all of my games. And, I can confirm that
none of my self-pair games from the 2012 US Go Congress are in there. Does anyone know what's up with that?
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:25 pm
by seigenblues
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I've made a few improvements: The winner of a game now has their name shaded green -- it's a little messy, though, what do you guys think?
EricBackus wrote:And, I can confirm that none of my self-pair games from the 2012 US Go Congress are in there. Does anyone know what's up with that?
I'm not sure; I'd send an e-mail to
ratings@usgo.org; it's quite possible that the self-pair director hasn't submitted the games yet to be rated -- in which case, a little reminder can't hurt

Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:14 am
by gurujeet
I like it - a definite improvement.
- gurujeet
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:14 am
by gurujeet
I like it - a definite improvement.
- gurujeet
Re: AGAGD comes to everyone
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:38 pm
by vash3g
seigenblues wrote:Thanks for the feedback everyone. I've made a few improvements: The winner of a game now has their name shaded green -- it's a little messy, though, what do you guys think?
I like it, it looks good. It also takes away one more column and makes the data cleaner.