WEEK 3-5
brace yourselves, long read is coming
It's been a while since my last update. I didn't think it was worth my time writing my progress down since nothing spectacular has happened. I played only a few games and solved tsumego and tesuji problems. Also, after a couple of months of restrain i smashed another mouse after a loss...i guess habits die hard
From ''Tesuji'' i left out the chapter ''Making shape'' since it seems i have a hard time understanding the concept and the final problems since i don't want to spoil them. I will review the whole book one more time and then i'll attempt them.
From ''Life and Death'' i reached till ''The J groups'' and stopped there. I had been having increasing difficulty in solving the problems in an adequate amount of time. For many problems i would take up to 20 minutes (and some times more) to read out and this started getting on my nerves

so i put that aside and focused only on ''Tesuji''. This bring me to a question i've been meaning to ask; in your opinion in order to get something like 70-80% accuracy how strong must someone be 5k ,8k etc?
As of now, i'm reading ''38 Basic Josekis'' and just started ''Attack and Defense''. I have read till page 31 and i'm already impressed with the content. This book has something that the previous lacked; depth. Maybe 38 could be excused, but as i was reading ''Tesuji'' and ''L&D'' i got the impression that Davies lacked the will of explaining those concepts. Maybe he didn't want to elaborate on those concepts. Maybe the format of those books is designed in that way to train your reading through endless examples and you'll begin to understand the deeper meaning as you go along. I'd say that ''Tesuji'' and ''L&D'' are the equivalent of a supplementary book in a mathematics course; the kind of book which has little theory and is full of solved examples whereas ''A&D'' is the work of an expert on this field, full of theory and rigorous proofs. On the other hand the concept of this book is strategy instead of tactics so the deeper thinking might be expected.
Maybe i'm just biased since i recognised myself as early as page 21 and i quote
''...
like a certain player we knew whose sole purpose in the game was the destruction of enemy stones.''

and he goes on to explain in depth the shortcomings of such an approach. I think i gained a stone just by reading those pages
Despite my limited experience i have the impression that chess players tend to play that way. A reason could be that they are accustomed to the nature of that game. In chess it's much easier to attack successfully than defend. In most cases even a solid defense can lead to a prolonged fight with a seemingly passive position which would result in a draw at best. Also the prize in chess is much more profound. Attack the king and attempt to mate him (
all you chess players out there who want to murder me for this sacrilege please consider the notion i'm trying to convey and not the details). So, all in all especially for all those who play this do or die style i would recommend reading this book.
As usual my statistics from ''Tesuji'' and ''L&D'' is as follows
L&D
''The first L+1 group'' 4/6 (took me huge amounts of time)
''The second L+1 group'' 5.5/6
''The L+2 group'' 2/5 (rediculously difficult)
''The tripod group'' 4/6
''The J group'' 3/6
Tesuji
''Cutting groups apart'' 7/10
''Into enemy territory'' 10.5/
''Escape'' 9.5/11
''Sacrifice to gain tempo'' 11/13
''Tesuji for attack'' 10.5/18 (last 9 problems tough as nails)
''How to connect'' 7/12
''Ignore the atari'' 5/12
''Double threat tesuji'' 6/9
From now there will be a change of context in my posts. Instead of posting games to be reviewed i'll try to post positions, tsumego, tesuji, joseki and stuff that i come across in my studies/games. Maybe this will be more interesting. Stay tuned!