Life In 19x19 http://www.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
This 'n' that http://www.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=12327 |
Page 10 of 53 |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Fri Feb 12, 2016 8:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Dear Friends, I am going through a difficult time now, which is why I have not been posting much. Thanks to people for their interesting comments. ![]() Dieter is right that ![]() This connection is better than the one in the book. On average it is 2 points better, which means that the book play is a serious flaw. A kyu level mistake, if you will. Kudos to Dieter! ![]() ![]() ![]() However, let us compare the two plays with a difference game. Who wins the difference game, playing first? ![]() ![]() If White tries to capture the ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Shaddy [ Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
The result is strange because that's the wrong difference game. This should be the right one: |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Shaddy wrote: The result is strange because that's the wrong difference game. This should be the right one: This is a transposition of the first Black first variation in the difference game above. Yes, Black to play wins the difference game. The question is whether White first also wins. But you are on the right track about whether the above difference game is the right one. ![]() |
Author: | Jhyn [ Sat Feb 13, 2016 3:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Bill Spight wrote: ![]() ![]() I might be wrong about the purpose of a difference game, and this seems like the perfect example to clarify it. There is a time where ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Jhyn wrote: Bill Spight wrote: ![]() ![]() I might be wrong about the purpose of a difference game, and this seems like the perfect example to clarify it. There is a time where ![]() ![]() Difference games rely upon the independence of the two regions of the board being compared. Kos may destroy that independence. You are right that one line of play may be better than the other because of ko threats, but that is not something that difference games address. If this is the correct difference game to compare the two plays, then sometimes ![]() ![]() The caveat about kos means that difference games do not say absolutely that one play is better than another, but they give stronger evidence than the size of plays. ![]() |
Author: | Jhyn [ Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Bill Spight wrote: Difference games rely upon the independence of the two regions of the board being compared. Kos may destroy that independence. You are right that one line of play may be better than the other because of ko threats, but that is not something that difference games address. If this is the correct difference game to compare the two plays, then sometimes ![]() ![]() The caveat about kos means that difference games do not say absolutely that one play is better than another, but they give stronger evidence than the size of plays. ![]() I understand that ko cannot be taken fully into consideration because of the possible dependence between the two regions. Still, consider that ![]() To reiterate my point: I believe that if Sakata's move is better, then this can only happen in the case that some ko is involved. I would love to be proven wrong. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Jhyn wrote: To reiterate my point: I believe that if Sakata's move is better, then this can only happen in the case that some ko is involved. I would love to be proven wrong. IMO, you are right. But that means that the above difference game is the wrong one to compare the two moves. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sun Feb 14, 2016 5:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Shaddy is right that we are comparing the wrong difference game, and jhyn is right that the 3d line cut could be used as a ko threat. Remember that difference games and kos don't mix. ![]() So what is the right difference game and why? How can we tell? This is the correct difference game because ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Obviously, Black wins. Black makes mirror go, and gets jigo. This way Black gets jigo, as well. Black wins the difference game, and never loses, so Dieter's play is superior. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
So how do we know that that ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This is a reverse because ![]() ![]() ![]() In this difference game we are comparing the original position (top) with the position after ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If ![]() ![]() ![]() So White to play cannot win the difference game, and the ![]() ![]() ![]() What is the other way to detect the reverse? Look at the first variation of the difference game. ![]() ![]() ![]() Let's check another sequence. Conceivably this is another reverse. If so, White to play should not be able to win the difference game below. If ![]() ![]() White wins, so that sequence does not reverse. We might have guessed as much since the first line cut by White eliminated Black's best play in the original position. ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
I wrote: Bill Spight wrote: I confess that I overlooked the reverse at first. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I misspoke. Here is such a position. Of course. ![]() ![]() The point of the exercise, however, is that ![]() But wait! If ![]() ![]() Easy. Let's compare the two plays with a difference game. ![]() To do that we mirror the whole right side. Now we compare ![]() ![]() ![]() Well, we have made the left side strict miai, haven't we? So we can ignore it and just look at the right side. ![]() ![]() White to play wins, Black to play does not. So ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Okigo Jizai As some of you probably know, I am fond of Okigo Jizai, a 10 volume set of handicap go openings published in 1824 by Hattori Inshuku, founder of the Hattori School. I have posted material here from it several times. See, for instance, this thread. viewtopic.php?f=15&t=9409 Here are a couple of positions from the book for you to ponder. There is no plainly best play. But I like how Hattori treats them. ![]() ![]() ![]() Hattori says that ![]() ![]() ![]() Hattori says that ![]() Enjoy! ![]() |
Author: | Kirby [ Fri Feb 19, 2016 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Author: | Shaddy [ Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Consider this tewari? |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Interesting comments, guys. Thanks. ![]() I renewed my interest in Okigo Jizai when I ran across another book about openings, both even game and handicap, written in the early 20th century. What struck me was how similar the handicap openings were to most of those that I have seen in more modern books; that is, uninspired, and uninspiring. Black should play conservatively but not too defensively and avoid mistakes. That kind of thing. By contrast, I sense a spirit in Hattori's examples, as though he were asking himself, where would I play? There is a sharpness to the play that I find both refreshing and inspiring. (True, I sometimes think that he is setting up lessons, but that's OK, too. ![]() In the mini-Chinese example Hattori as Black tenukies. ![]() ![]() ![]() White obliges with the jaw jab at 21. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Both ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() White pushes through into the center and then Black continues the leaning attack with ![]() Instead of continuing the attack, Black shifts to the left side and center. This exchange strengthens White and yields territory on the side, but it also strengthens Black and makes a territorial framework in the center. The ![]() This is another lesson from Hattori. The White stones in the top are weak, but Black does not just singlemindedly attack them. Black is flexible. You often see attackus interruptus in Hattori's examples. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Sun Feb 21, 2016 8:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
The three stone game ![]() ![]() ![]() Hattori praises ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The shoulder blow, ![]() ![]() ![]() Reply to Kirby's peep: Black responds in New Fuseki style, with the keimas of ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I think you can see why I like Okigo Jizai. ![]() |
Author: | Kirby [ Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
One thing that I have observed in the past year or so is that "rules" don't apply all of the time, especially when weak groups are involved. From an empty board, black's play might seem odd: Moves ![]() ![]() If black wanted to secure territory in this area, the "floating stones" would make more sense if they were lower: Now the position is much more clear. But in the game, there is a weak group involved: The prospects of black making territory in the marked area seem much higher, due to white's weak group. The same aji might exist as on the empty board, but white can't really think about exploiting it, since white's other group is weak. As white saves the group, black will naturally get more than if he played a "normal" move as what came to my mind (ignoring the peep, which may be questionable): |
Author: | skydyr [ Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Well, even in a position like this but without the weak group, a move like ![]() |
Author: | Kirby [ Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
skydyr wrote: The tewari presented (5 white star point stones) is very different from this, to the point that regardless of what black played on the bottom, it would feel like black has already fallen behind. Sure. The only thing I want to describe is the feeling I have gotten that the "rules" change when weak groups are involved. It's difficult for me to articulate this well, but nonetheless, interesting to me. |
Author: | ez4u [ Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Interestingly 18 below is not found in GoGoD as far as I can see. Invariably Black connects with the attachment at 'a' instead. That applies whether you are Onoda Chiyotaro playing Hashimoto Utaro in 1936 or Cho Han-seung playing Gu Li in 2013. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: This 'n' that |
Igo Tsumekata (How to play tsumego) is another ancient book I kind of like. I haven't worked through it all yet, though. It is by Kobayashi Tetsujiro, 6 dan, and his son, Kentaro, published in 1901. Link to online copy in the Japanese National Library: http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/861034 Here are a couple of problems, one easy, one not. ![]() Enjoy! ![]() |
Page 10 of 53 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |