Re: A DDK's baby steps
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:15 pm
Some comments on the last posted game, which I have not seen in the other reviews:
Your opening bamboo joint (P6) is a nice local shape move -- I would call it a good move at your level -- but you will make big progress in your overall game if you stop to think whether a move here is needed or not. Your move defends two stones, but what strategic significance do those stones have? W is so strong to the right that these stones do not affect his group at all. If you do not defend, what will W do? He can push through Q5, but you can just let him capture two stones, making only a few points of additional territory in gote. Meanwhile, you can play a really big strategically important move like G17, or perhaps a simple safe territorial extension around K4.
Carrying on with this theme, after your bamboo joint connection, suppose W played atari at Q5 sometime soon. Quick, where would you play? I suspect your knee-jerk reaction would be to connect, and to be happy that W failed to cut your bamboo joint, while losing a liberty in the process. But much much better would be to tenuki, and to be exceedingly happy if W wasted yet another move capturing two worthless stones.
D18 is sometimes a tesuji, allowing you to play B18 in sente. Good job spotting it, rather than just passively playing B17. But more often, it is even better to play B18 (double-hane) directly. Do you see that W cannot really take you up on the offer to cut and capture this stone? So you get the same nice B shape as in the game, without giving W such a nice capture. Not a big difference, but worth learning.
You seem happy with the exchange E12 for C11 (and similar exchanges elsewhere). But the B stone strengthens a group which was already strong, while the W stone nearly secures a group which was very weak, and makes more additional territory than the B move. Not all forcing moves are good; here W is the one who should be pleased with the exchange.
Your opening bamboo joint (P6) is a nice local shape move -- I would call it a good move at your level -- but you will make big progress in your overall game if you stop to think whether a move here is needed or not. Your move defends two stones, but what strategic significance do those stones have? W is so strong to the right that these stones do not affect his group at all. If you do not defend, what will W do? He can push through Q5, but you can just let him capture two stones, making only a few points of additional territory in gote. Meanwhile, you can play a really big strategically important move like G17, or perhaps a simple safe territorial extension around K4.
Carrying on with this theme, after your bamboo joint connection, suppose W played atari at Q5 sometime soon. Quick, where would you play? I suspect your knee-jerk reaction would be to connect, and to be happy that W failed to cut your bamboo joint, while losing a liberty in the process. But much much better would be to tenuki, and to be exceedingly happy if W wasted yet another move capturing two worthless stones.
D18 is sometimes a tesuji, allowing you to play B18 in sente. Good job spotting it, rather than just passively playing B17. But more often, it is even better to play B18 (double-hane) directly. Do you see that W cannot really take you up on the offer to cut and capture this stone? So you get the same nice B shape as in the game, without giving W such a nice capture. Not a big difference, but worth learning.
You seem happy with the exchange E12 for C11 (and similar exchanges elsewhere). But the B stone strengthens a group which was already strong, while the W stone nearly secures a group which was very weak, and makes more additional territory than the B move. Not all forcing moves are good; here W is the one who should be pleased with the exchange.