Re: Proper sabaki example
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2022 1:36 pm
I'm afraid I still don't think I understand what sabaki is, only perhaps what it is not.
But I was drawn to the use of the words "force" and "momentum". I think of these as revolving around weak points. It seems that the level of force is proportional to the value attached to nearby weak points (and dependent on how many moves it takes to profit). However, momentum implies direction persistence, a force that causes motion in some region of space, which then having moved, exerts a force in the same direction in another region. Of course, individual Go stones don't move, so to answer the question of what exactly is moving, I could call it "centre of mass of vital points", i.e. the options that W has to escape.
In this sense, perhaps W takes a hit when B punches, but doesn't have to block directly spending a move. Instead, W can dodge and avoid directly responding to the punch. By moving away from the punch, W crashes into B's formation above. Although B is quite solid, W is strong enough to poke a hole in it to allow another direction of escape, which is all W is asking for. We find that B punches W into their own shape, but this also gives themselves time to reinforce, making W heavier since W remains behind enemy lines without any extra eyes. Somehow, W swallows a floating component of the wall to get past it, perhaps this is why a dragon analogy is used.
But I was drawn to the use of the words "force" and "momentum". I think of these as revolving around weak points. It seems that the level of force is proportional to the value attached to nearby weak points (and dependent on how many moves it takes to profit). However, momentum implies direction persistence, a force that causes motion in some region of space, which then having moved, exerts a force in the same direction in another region. Of course, individual Go stones don't move, so to answer the question of what exactly is moving, I could call it "centre of mass of vital points", i.e. the options that W has to escape.
In this sense, perhaps W takes a hit when B punches, but doesn't have to block directly spending a move. Instead, W can dodge and avoid directly responding to the punch. By moving away from the punch, W crashes into B's formation above. Although B is quite solid, W is strong enough to poke a hole in it to allow another direction of escape, which is all W is asking for. We find that B punches W into their own shape, but this also gives themselves time to reinforce, making W heavier since W remains behind enemy lines without any extra eyes. Somehow, W swallows a floating component of the wall to get past it, perhaps this is why a dragon analogy is used.