Page 3 of 3
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:32 pm
by mitsun
Mosquito meets train:
The solution has been given correctly a few times already, but maybe a little graph will make it clear that the mosquito does stop momentarily, while the train does not. The elasticity of the collision affects the sharpness of the velocity changes, but not the basic structure.
Horizontal axis = time
Vertical axis = velocity (positive in direction of train)
Giant mosquito meets toy train:
train
------------|
|
|---------- train + mosquito
|
|
|
0 ---------------------- zero velocity
mosquito |
------------|
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:34 pm
by mitsun
Soda ramp problem in another form:
How can you tell a raw egg from a hard-boiled egg, without breaking the egg?
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:44 pm
by SpongeBob
O.k., nobel prize for experimental physics goes to Dusk Eagle, nobel prize for theoretical physics goes to Harleqin.
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:55 pm
by cyclops
HermanHiddema wrote:The title "Physics puzzles" reminded me of this one:

from
xkcd 
13/18 Ohm is my answer apart from miscalculations.
Here is my reasoning:
Problem for Herman: Next 3 dimensions?
edit: nice try but wrong. First assertion only true at both axes.
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:19 am
by Tommie
mitsun wrote:Mosquito meets train:
The solution has been given correctly a few times already, but maybe a little graph will make it clear that the mosquito does stop momentarily, while the train does not. The elasticity of the collision affects the sharpness of the velocity changes, but not the basic structure.
Horizontal axis = time
Vertical axis = velocity (positive in direction of train)
Giant mosquito meets toy train:
train
------------|
|
|---------- train + mosquito
|
|
|
0 ---------------------- zero velocity
mosquito |
------------|
Your idea with the graph is nice, Mitsun.
I just realize how many assumptions we do (automatically), without reflecting a bit
and checking with reality.
Did we book-wise

think of masses, carrying on their movevements frictionless for eternity through imaginary endless space?
'The locomotive is pulling strongly' the unprepossessed child says,
'of course the train doesn't stop!'.
Hence, the refinement of wording such a puzzle is iterative.
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:16 am
by cyclops
HermanHiddema wrote:The title "Physics puzzles" reminded me of this one:

from
xkcd 
I was only a few percents off in my nonsense solution

Solution as you might have guessed:

- circuit.jpg (72.33 KiB) Viewed 10625 times
Fill in n_= 1 and p_ = 2 for the endpoints ( or the other way around ) and you get
published by D. Atkinson and F.J. van Steenwijk.
link.
The first one, curious enough, is the professor who taught me Quantum Electrodynamics in the seventies. qed
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:32 pm
by ethanb
Tommie wrote:ethanb wrote:Even disregarding flOvermind's (correct, I believe) argument from conservation of momentum, there is also the point that the collision with the insect is partly elastic. I didn't see you mention "a spherical mosquito of uniform density" but you did say that it squished. Therefore the transfer of kinetic energy actually took place over time, not in a single instant. So zero wasn't a factor anyway.
Did we book-wise

think of masses, carrying on their movevements frictionless for eternity through imaginary endless space?
Sorry for merging the quote blocks like that, but that was what I was getting at with the "spherical mosquito of uniform density" bit - the "reality vs. theory" (or rather an incomplete theory) idea. There's an old joke that I don't actually know, but have seen/heard a reference to somewhere, and the punchline is something like "and the physicist goes 'First you have to assume a spherical chicken of uniform density!'" Oh, and the "therefore" was related to the squishing, not to the shape or density of the mosquito.
And yeah, I knew it was a puzzle to enjoy - and I was, just in a joking tone. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that.

But no, the mass of the mosquito is comparatively so small that even if it were a completely inelastic collision, its velocity would have to oppose the train's at an appreciable fraction of the speed of light before it made a noticeable impact.
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:19 am
by flOvermind
Re: Physics puzzles
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:01 am
by cyclops
HermanHiddema wrote:The title "Physics puzzles" reminded me of this one:

from
xkcd 
Finally, I got the humor of your contribution. It takes longer for a nerd, you know. I enjoyed to have been sniped totally. To share some of my pleasures here some
youtube.
Re: Physics puzzles OT-OT
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:39 am
by Tommie
Three people are the last survivors of a capsized, sunk cruise ship,
an engineer , a physicist and an economist (macro~).
They can save themselves onto a small unihabited island.
Some last cans of beluga caviar and other essential nourriture is washed-up as well.
Exhausted and starving, they hurry to get the food.
The
engineer takes shells, stones etc. and opens the cans within 2 minutes.
The
physicist/mathematician mumbles erh_pi_square_time_m_c_v.... and lays the cans under a coconut tree.
The
macro-economist ponders: "
Assuming that we had had a tin-opener .... "

[img]
http://www.cowart.info/Cool%20Stuff%20I ... age005.gif[/img]