Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Post by Bill Spight »

"
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . B . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Not a criticism of :b4: in the game, but this is another approach. It is difficult for White to reply on the 3-3.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
topazg
Tengen
Posts: 4511
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Location: Chatteris, UK
Has thanked: 1579 times
Been thanked: 650 times
Contact:

Re: Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Post by topazg »

I don't think there's anything wrong with chew's :b4: really. After all, particularly regarding the use of the tewari analysis, the 5-3 approach to a 3-3 is a perfectly reasonable joseki, albeit a much rarer one than the other two. With a 4-4 in the top top right, I think Black has nothing to be too unhappy about anywhere right now.
User avatar
Joaz Banbeck
Judan
Posts: 5546
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Location: Banbeck Vale
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 1434 times

Re: Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Post by Joaz Banbeck »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Having decided that there is nothing urgent on the right side, I'm going to look at the rest of the board.

There are moderately big plays at the top, but nothing urgent. There are bigger plays on the left side, but again, nothing urgent. On the bottom, there is an urgent issue: black can play N3. It ruins the shape of the corner, and deprives it of the natural extension along the lower side.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So my next move has to deal with that. The easiest and simplest way is to play there or immediately nearby myself.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Solid but unenterprising. 'A' works also.
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . W a . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Another possibility is to play someplace along the bottom such that he can play N3, but the results are no good for him because he has insufficient room for an extension, like this:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Black is heavy with no eyes. Moves 'b' through 'g' also work.
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . e f g . 3 . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . b c d W . 1 2 . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I'm going to choose the second possibility because the first looks too passive. I'm 2 stones behind, so I need to push him a bit. Which one? I think that I can dismiss the high moves 'e', 'f', and 'g' because they leave an open skirt and can be undercut too easily:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc White has no easy follow up move.
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . W , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

So it comes down to one of these:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . x x x x . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


The leftmost one is the most ambitious. It prevents the formation of an easy extension by black, but its follow up move still leaves an invasion:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Invasion possible at move 3 or later
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 1 . W . . 2 . 3 . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

The next looks better:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc No invasion, but flat. Hard to develop quickly.
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 1 . W . . 2 . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

The next is my favorite, because it has a good follow up

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc No invasion likely, and I get influence
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 1 . . W . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Lastly, the rightmost is too small for my tastes:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc No invasion, and I get influence, but a tad small
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 1 . . . W . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
User avatar
topazg
Tengen
Posts: 4511
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Location: Chatteris, UK
Has thanked: 1579 times
Been thanked: 650 times
Contact:

Re: Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Post by topazg »

Maybe that explains it, it appears Joaz is unaware that what Chew has played is joseki. I think White is too thin here. Black can't approach from the lower left easily, but then, that's not urgent anyway. He now has weak points to aim at:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . O , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 7 c a b . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Both "a" and "b" can cause White some locally reasonably serious issues now. Joseki was "a" or "b" in much the same way that is here:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . 2 , 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . b a . . . 6 4 5 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
User avatar
Loons
Gosei
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:17 am
GD Posts: 0
Location: wHam!lton, Aotearoa
Has thanked: 253 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Post by Loons »

@topazg
I may be a little rusty right now, but I am surprised we disagree again so soon. I think that Joaz' extension is joseki (not from any source, feels like a joseki and I'm sure I've seen it before). By way of local tactics- if Chew invades, I think Joaz lives with fair points in the corner (and is out) while Chew must look to his invading stone and Joaz has options concerning k3 (one stone is an aji!). - And if Chew doesn't invade, the further extension gives Joaz some options for efficiency. In a perfect world K3 would be independently bigger and Joaz would already have support with which to pressure R8, but for the start of a handicap game, I don't think these moves can really be faulted.

On a slight tangent; I think K3 extension is joseki in topazg's comparative position too, but modern style, I'm told, does favor tighter, thicker extensions (which can tenuki approaches easily).


@Chew
If Joaz had opened on the 3-3, would you have played for this joseki immediately?


And I am going to bed, KGS tournament in 7 hours (which effects my current grammar). Also topazg, we still need to play sometime!
Revisiting Go - Study Journal
My Programming Blog - About the evolution of my go bot.
User avatar
daniel_the_smith
Gosei
Posts: 2116
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Location: Silicon Valley
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 330 times
Contact:

Re: Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Post by daniel_the_smith »

@loons, topazg:

Joaz's move looks too far to me, as well. And, indeed, dailyjoseki.com says that pros usually play a line or two closer.
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
User avatar
topazg
Tengen
Posts: 4511
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Location: Chatteris, UK
Has thanked: 1579 times
Been thanked: 650 times
Contact:

Re: Malkovich 104 - Joaz vs Chew Terr

Post by topazg »

Loons wrote:@topazg
I may be a little rusty right now, but I am surprised we disagree again so soon. I think that Joaz' extension is joseki (not from any source, feels like a joseki and I'm sure I've seen it before). By way of local tactics- if Chew invades, I think Joaz lives with fair points in the corner (and is out) while Chew must look to his invading stone and Joaz has options concerning k3 (one stone is an aji!). - And if Chew doesn't invade, the further extension gives Joaz some options for efficiency. In a perfect world K3 would be independently bigger and Joaz would already have support with which to pressure R8, but for the start of a handicap game, I don't think these moves can really be faulted.

On a slight tangent; I think K3 extension is joseki in topazg's comparative position too, but modern style, I'm told, does favor tighter, thicker extensions (which can tenuki approaches easily).


I have no idea, you may be right, it just feels a bit open and thin somehow. Interestingly, josekipedia agrees with me, and doesn't feature Joaz' move, brugo agrees with you, and doesn't feature either of mine, dailyjoseki features the position 95 times, and displays only my options (total of 22 plays), with tenuki winning at 25 times, but also seems to typically display some stones on the bottom edge at K3, so it's hard to know if it affects it or not. Kogo's only displays L3, but not K3 or M3, however M3 is cited as joseki in Shin Hayawakari Shojiten - other than that I don't know.

Certainly, I don't think it's outright bad, but it has a bad flavour to me - something I'd want to go back and patch up sometime, and that makes me uncomfortable I guess. It's unlikely to make much difference here I think though.

Your question to chew is very pertinent though. That maybe hints that the timing was off for this approach. I think both sides have nothing to complain about yet :)

PS Yeah, we should play soon