Page 3 of 4

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:35 pm
by zslane
FWIW, I couldn't resist purchasing a set of 11.6mm Yunzi stones from YMI today (eBay). I don't know why; I just couldn't. Will have them next week, probably right after New Year's.

My collection will then consist of:

  • 8mm glass
  • 10mm plastic
  • 11.6mm yunzi

Still no slate & shell stones in my collection. Maybe someday. :mrgreen:

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 4:29 pm
by Bonobo
zslane wrote:FWIW, I couldn't resist purchasing a set of 11.6mm Yunzi stones from YMI today (eBay). [..]
Congratulations! Now I’ve got stone envy again. And this right after I ordered a set of 21.5 x 11 mm glass stones from Hebsacker Verlag yesterday :-?

Still no slate & shell stones in my collection. Maybe someday :mrgreen:
Heh. Just dreaming of such … AND. I. WANNA. HAVE. THEM. 21.5mm! x! 21.5mm! For some added fun :razz:

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:23 pm
by EdLee
Bonobo wrote:21.5mm! x! 21.5mm! For some added fun :razz:
Spherical marbles... :shock:

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:51 am
by daal
So, as promised, here are a few pics:

Image

Image

Image

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:01 am
by solomonko
I've owned several sets of go stones. This is the one I'm currently using. It's size 38, and it feels good, though you need to practice for a while to play with such thick stones. (The white is, of course, made out of shells. Presumably mexican.)

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:28 pm
by tchan001
There is nothing bigger than size 50 (around 14mm) for slate and shell go stones.

editted to just report the fact.

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:02 pm
by tj86430
tchan001 wrote:I don't own this set but I have pics :)
http://tchan001.wordpress.com/2010/08/1 ... go-stones/

Unfortunately I'm not one of the "select few" who can access that picture. (What is the point of having a private blog and then posting links to it?)

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:21 pm
by EdLee
solomonko wrote:This is the one I'm currently using. It's size 38, and it feels good
I think size 38 is fantastic. :mrgreen:

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:38 pm
by badukJr
I have pretty big hands, I hate playing with smaller stones. I cannot grip them. I wish bigger stones were more readily available.

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:35 pm
by harpreet
tj86430 wrote:
tchan001 wrote:I don't own this set but I have pics :)
http://tchan001.wordpress.com/2010/08/1 ... go-stones/

Unfortunately I'm not one of the "select few" who can access that picture. (What is the point of having a private blog and then posting links to it?)


If you never told anyone about it how would people know you have a private blog?

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:54 am
by tj86430
harpreet wrote:
tj86430 wrote:
tchan001 wrote:I don't own this set but I have pics :)
http://tchan001.wordpress.com/2010/08/1 ... go-stones/

Unfortunately I'm not one of the "select few" who can access that picture. (What is the point of having a private blog and then posting links to it?)


If you never told anyone about it how would people know you have a private blog?

While this is very much OT, I'll still comment: If I had a private blog, I would tell those whom I wanted to invite, and not others. If I wanted to invite everyone who shows interest, it would be public.

There are other, IMNSHO much better ways of linking pictures to a public forum than using a link to a private blog. Of course, if the poster's intention is to tell to others "look, I have something private, but only those I like can see it", then sure, it works. I believe this is not the case here, since such behavior reminds me of a bunch of five-year-olds in the playground.

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:19 am
by tchan001
This thread is not about my blog. It's about the size of stones. I just happen to have a post on my blog which is very relevant to a post by a poster who DOES have access to my blog.
If you don't have access, it wasn't meant for you. So I have editted my post to just show the facts which are relevant. Please do not argue about my blog anymore.
Bonobo wrote:Heh. Just dreaming of such … AND. I. WANNA. HAVE. THEM. 21.5mm! x! 21.5mm! For some added fun :razz:


So please keep the posts relevant to the thread as per TOS.

3. Meaningless Posts
Keep posts relevant to the topic and make sure to use the edit button when appropriate. Don't post for the sake of post counts. Spam is not allowed. Also, personal conversations between members should be done via Private Messaging, not in a thread.

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:08 am
by Bonobo
tchan001 wrote:[..]

Bonobo wrote:Heh. Just dreaming of such … AND. I. WANNA. HAVE. THEM. 21.5mm! x! 21.5mm! For some added fun :razz:

So please keep the posts relevant to the thread as per TOS.

3. Meaningless Posts
Keep posts relevant to the topic and make sure to use the edit button when appropriate. Don't post for the sake of post counts. Spam is not allowed. Also, personal conversations between members should be done via Private Messaging, not in a thread.
Uhm :shock: I am very interested in this topic and have also contributed a little bit.

My quoted post was just a little light-hearted kidding, I’m certainly aware that spherical stones would roll off the board.

So, do you think this was a “meaningless post” as in your quoted TOS §3? :-?

Greetings, Tom

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:16 am
by tchan001
Spherical stones are just a size of stone which does not exist for slate and shell. It doesn’t mean you cannot custom order the size in another material if you have the money and the connections.

Bonodo, your post is very relevant. I just used it to illustrate that the fact which I posted was also relevant to the thread

Re: Size of stone

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:25 am
by Bonobo
tchan001 wrote:Spherical stones are just a size of stone which does not exist for slate and shell. It doesn’t mean you cannot custom order the size in another material if you have the money and the connections.
Well, aside from the fact that I was just kidding re: spherical stones, several decades ago I had the idea to create a go board with small depressions (hollows? corries? indentations? pits? German: »Mulden«) at the intersections, and with marbles instead of our usual stones, but I never got to really creating this since I was busy procrastinating with other stuff :roll:

Bonodo, your post is very relevant. I just used it to illustrate that the fact which I posted was also relevant to the thread
Thanks, Tchan, for clearing this up for me, I appreciate this since I really worried a bit. Actually I believe it was not really that relevant but just joking, albeit on topic ;-)