Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:21 am
Even 9p's can self-atari (very kyu, and extremely rare), and kyu people routinely open with pro moves.
A move should be called "objectively" as it is -- although the player's level can add to the occasion:
("an exceptionally good move for a kyu player," or "how can a 6-dan play this move??").
A move can be "good for kyu levels", "good for dan levels", or "good for pro level".
Likewise a mistake can be a "kyu level mistake" or a "pro level mistake".
People (even pros) can also be wrong about their assessment of a move.
What would be interesting (and educational?) is compare pro opinion of some of these colorful assessments.
A move should be called "objectively" as it is -- although the player's level can add to the occasion:
("an exceptionally good move for a kyu player," or "how can a 6-dan play this move??").
A move can be "good for kyu levels", "good for dan levels", or "good for pro level".
Likewise a mistake can be a "kyu level mistake" or a "pro level mistake".
People (even pros) can also be wrong about their assessment of a move.
What would be interesting (and educational?) is compare pro opinion of some of these colorful assessments.