Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
- Chew Terr
- Gosei
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:45 pm
- Rank: KGS 3k
- GD Posts: 264
- KGS: Chew
- Location: Texas
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
The pincer is an imposing move, and after I played my approach, I second-guessed it because of this pincer in specific. Red, you recommend a wide approach? I was a bit concerned that he would get to easily seal the corner and I would be stuck without a lot. Was I wanting too much, do you think? Araban, would you have recommended a far low approach, or is there a different one you'd prefer?
At the moment, since I'm clearly in my opponent's turf, I'm playing attachments to strengthen my stones and nab a little stability if I can.
Someday I want to be strong enough to earn KGS[-].
- Chew Terr
- Gosei
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:45 pm
- Rank: KGS 3k
- GD Posts: 264
- KGS: Chew
- Location: Texas
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
- Solomon
- Gosei
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:21 pm
- Rank: AGA 5d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Capsule 4d
- Tygem: 치킨까스 5d
- Location: Bellevue, WA
- Has thanked: 90 times
- Been thanked: 835 times
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
Sure, a two-space low approach would have been better me thinks.Chew Terr wrote:Araban, would you have recommended a far low approach, or is there a different one you'd prefer?
- Aphelion
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:14 pm
- Rank: KGS 4 kyu
- GD Posts: 227
- KGS: Aphelion02
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
What about 2 space high? I kind of like the look of it because depending on how Black responds, White may tenuki to approach the lower left.
- Mezzanyne
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:07 am
- Rank: AGA and KGS 7k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Mezzanyne
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
I never really understood why the two space approach is considered pincer-proof. Isn't there still a valid one space low pincer response? (To both high and low approaches)
- Loons
- Gosei
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:17 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: wHam!lton, Aotearoa
- Has thanked: 253 times
- Been thanked: 105 times
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
I think comparing these gives a reasonable abstraction;
(hidden for space)
Black has more space inside the pincer == better.
What joseki are you picturing after 2 space high approach, Aph?
(hidden for space)
Black has more space inside the pincer == better.
What joseki are you picturing after 2 space high approach, Aph?
- Aphelion
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:14 pm
- Rank: KGS 4 kyu
- GD Posts: 227
- KGS: Aphelion02
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
Nothing complicated:
I didn't consider a pincer that much, I imagine the stone will be easy to treat light.
I didn't consider a pincer that much, I imagine the stone will be easy to treat light.
- Redundant
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:00 pm
- Rank: lazy
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: redundant/silchas
- Tygem: redundant
- Wbaduk: redundant
- DGS: redundant
- OGS: redundant
- Location: Pittsburgh
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
Mezzanyne wrote:I never really understood why the two space approach is considered pincer-proof. Isn't there still a valid one space low pincer response? (To both high and low approaches)
You can pincer the two space approaches, but the attack isn't as severe. There's simply more space between the approach stone and the two in the pincer.
-
Kirby
- Honinbo
- Posts: 9553
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Kirby
- Tygem: 커비라고해
- Has thanked: 1583 times
- Been thanked: 1707 times
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
Mezzanyne wrote:I never really understood why the two space approach is considered pincer-proof. Isn't there still a valid one space low pincer response? (To both high and low approaches)
I think that a two space approach is not "pincer-proof", but if your opponent DOES end up pincering a two-space approach, he/she doesn't get as much benefit from the pincer as he/she would have if the approach were a one-space approach.
This is probably more true when the pincer acts as, not only a pincer, but also an extension. When it's an extension, a one-space pincer of a two-space approach will not be as far as a one-space pincer of a one-space approach.
In addition to that, when you do a two-space approach, a pincer is less severe, probably, because you have more space to react with a two-space approach than with a one-space approach.
be immersed
- Chew Terr
- Gosei
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:45 pm
- Rank: KGS 3k
- GD Posts: 264
- KGS: Chew
- Location: Texas
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
Like I said, I'd be willing to give up a decent chunk of territory in exchange for a stable group facing outwards here. White has a lot of strength around, and if I'm stable, that's mostly negated. I was originally going to just atari at E17, but then I couldn't resist the ideas I was reading below:
Someday I want to be strong enough to earn KGS[-].
- Chew Terr
- Gosei
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:45 pm
- Rank: KGS 3k
- GD Posts: 264
- KGS: Chew
- Location: Texas
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Chew vs Mezzanyne: Opening Practice
I stand by my reading. After this fight, we may want to call the opening more or less done, and go over things a bit. I've tried to comment fully, so I may not have a ton to add, but I'll look back afterwards and see if hindsight helps.
Someday I want to be strong enough to earn KGS[-].