Bill Spight wrote: For reference, you might enjoy this page: http://senseis.xmp.net/?BillSpight%2FStep
Sure ! I enjoy this link very much
I first thougth that a "static" analysis would be easy and a "dynamic" (to try to detect "purpose") would be complex.
but I was wrong... even the static one is complex
But anyway... that's still a way for me to get more familiar with shapes, which is more important to me than the program itself...