Re: Kirby's Study Journal
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 7:44 pm
What magazine do you get?
Life in 19x19. Go, Weiqi, Baduk... Thats the life.
https://www.lifein19x19.com/
It's a Korean Go magazine - "Monthly Go" [1].jeromie wrote:What magazine do you get?
I don't see the value in this generalization.Kirby wrote: 1. Strengthening my weak group is bigger than playing a big point.
The value is simply that I've noticed in my reviews that I often underestimate the value the opponent can get from attacking my weak group. Therefore, my thinking needs to be adjusted.aiichigo wrote: I don't see the value in this generalization.
I think we play in the same way. I'd like to play by knowing, too. It doesn't mean that I'm always going to defend a weak group when I see it. My saying is just a way for me to remember to consider adjusting my perception of how important it is to defend a group.aiichigo wrote:Perhaps my style of go playing is different from yours, I aim to play by knowing, If I don't know, then it is a fault of my go, or my effort, If I cannot understand a situation I need to find a way to make a decision, by finding a way to value the stones, the shapes, and groups. And from that understanding I then make a decision on what to play.
Actually, I guess we don't agree on all of the points you mentioned. The value of a weak group is not always easily calculated as you suggest.aiichigo wrote:The value of a weak group, can easily be calculated, if the opponent can kill it on their next move, then the size of saving the weak group is known. So it is possible to know when saving a weak group is the biggest move on the board, or when there are bigger moves.
Always know? Not really, values tend to be estimates because exact counting is too time consuming, but if you see the possibility of your opponent using sente moves against a weak group to get something, you can read out some variations, and then you have a value for those moves, then if you see a way to play that both helps your group and removes that possibility, you know the value of that move. Then you can think about letting your opponent get what he wants, and playing elsewhere, maybe getting more than your opponent gets. You now have values for both options, you can make a decision based on solid information.Kirby wrote:
I don't believe you if you're saying that you always know how much this is worth.
You're giving six handicap stones to somebody presumably at least six stones weaker than you. (So, about my rank or weaker.) Of course they can pincer it! You're supposed to be able to get a good position from when they err in the follow-up. Or something like that.The move above gives black a good move with the pincer
For those of us who only know the Hangul letters, but don't actually speak the language, who's the pro pictured? (Or is it not a pro?) I tried Shin Minchun and Shin Inwang, but an Internet search didn't yield anything.Kirby wrote:It's a Korean Go magazine - "Monthly Go" [1].jeromie wrote:What magazine do you get?
i think his name spells shin minjoon. He was first place on last rookie tournament. Yes he is not Hellboy.Fedya wrote: For those of us who only know the Hangul letters, but don't actually speak the language, who's the pro pictured? (Or is it not a pro?) I tried Shin Minchun and Shin Inwang, but an Internet search didn't yield anything.
And I know there's a reflection, but even discounting that, the angle of the photo makes his left arm look a heck of a lot bigger than the right arm, in a creepy way.
How can I argue with that? If Yilun Yang had a hard time creating problems at first, experienced slow progress, but pushed through it, then why not try to do the same? Progress might be slow, but maybe I can experience the happiness that he experienced. Creating problems is much more difficult than solving them, but why not? Maybe the same idea applies.Yilun Yang wrote: In the beginning, even though it cost me almost all my free time, my progress was very slow. Sometimes, even after I had put in a lot of effort, and several days had passed, I had failed to create anything of value. Moreover, sometimes my thoughts went completely in the wrong direction, and all those efforts were wasted. However, this hard work has also brought me tremendous happiness. For each time I successfully created a new life-and-death puzzle, I felt as if I had won an important match and I immersed myself completely in that wonderful feeling.