Page 7 of 22
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 8:54 pm
by EdLee
$$Wm45
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm45( Local time: Sunday Nov 9, 2014. 11:54 am. )
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 6:16 am
by Aidoneus
$$Bcm46
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm46
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:14 am
by Bill Spight
$$Wcm1
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm1
It appears that Aidoneus does not yet appreciate the value of
, which provides a base for White and aims at reducing the Black framework. That is mainly a question of experience.
$$Bcm1
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm1
Compare that diagram with this one.
strengthens the Black framework and still leaves White without a base.
$$Bcm1
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm1
BTW, my first impulse is the inside hane. But that leads to complications and this is a 6 stone game.
Edit: Unhidden.
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:24 pm
by EdLee
Hmm,
is big (big point for W, too),
but locally B can do better:
$$B
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$BLocal time: Monday Nov 10, 2014. 1:24 pm.
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:15 pm
by EdLee
$$Wm47
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm47( Local time: Tuesday Nov 11, 2014. 1:15 pm. )
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 5:55 am
by Aidoneus
$$Bcm48
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm48
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:11 pm
by EdLee
$$Wm49
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm49( Local time: Wed Nov 12, 2014. 1:11 pm. )
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:14 am
by Aidoneus
$$Bcm50
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm50
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:20 pm
by EdLee
$$Wm51
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm51( Local time: Thur Nov 13, 2014. 09:20 am. )
Re:
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:57 pm
by Bill Spight
$$Wcm49
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm49
One zokusuji deserves another, I guess. I wonder what Ed has in mind.
Edit: Unhidden.
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:38 am
by Aidoneus
$$Bcm52
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm52
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:06 am
by EdLee
$$Wm53
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm53( Local time: Thur Nov 13, 2014. 4:06 pm. )
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:25 am
by Aidoneus
$$Bcm54
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm54
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:53 am
by CnP
I'm enjoying following this game. I'd be tempted to play white 55 here
$$Bcm54
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm54
but the black group bottom left would be hard to kill
so that's probably too heavy a group to have sitting around? Looking at it, it seems like Ed's playing to reduce center territory - oh I don't know.. it's going to be interesting to see the next move from a proper player.
btw, playing black 56 after white 55 looks quite a good play to me, in the sense its a splitting attack.
$$Bcm54
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm54
Re: #244 Bill vs Ed
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:05 am
by Uberdude
If black plays strongly white could be the dead one:
$$Bcm54
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm54
, which provides a base for White and aims at reducing the Black framework. That is mainly a question of experience. 
strengthens the Black framework and still leaves White without a base.
is big (big point for W, too),