Page 1 of 1

why not joseki + what about this move ?

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 1:06 pm
by otenki
Aparently 4 is bad for black but i'm not sure why...
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
Also if you go this route you can get:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
Howhever what if black play this move:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 0 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
I don't even see how this 9 is doable for white ...

Thanks!
Otenki

Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 1:19 pm
by Bki
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . 1 . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
This peep?

Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 1:22 pm
by skydyr
The reason why it's not joseki is that white's original pincering stone is not under much pressure, but it's blocking black exactly where black would want to extend to secure eyespace. If you look at the 5-4 joseki where black attaches as in your diagram, black follows it up with an extension down the left side. White's pincer stone here blocks that, so black has to move into the center, but he doesn't have clear eyespace, he's not exerting a lot of pressure on the white upperside group, and the left side stone is light and flexible.

Regarding your :b10: I think that black's shape is a bit too weak for this. White should be able to peep and cut or something similar, without reading into it too much.

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 1:30 pm
by EdLee
Hi otenki, the order also matters; a common sequence:
( Rotated for space :) )
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W :b8: pincer around grey regions
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 5 . 4 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 , 2 . . 3 . ? ? .
$$ | . 7 6 a . . . . . ? ? .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | -----------------------[/go]
B exchanges :b6: with :w7: , but does not pull back at (a), and pincers instead.
Pulling back to (a), like :b6: in your 2nd diagram, may be heavy for B.

Later, if W ataris at (a) = :wc:, then B blocks at :b1: .
If W does not capture, B can drop to :b3: .
Now B has miai of (b) and (c):
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B :w2: tenuki
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . X . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O b X . . O .
$$ | . O X W 1 . . . .
$$ | . . 3 c . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | -----------------[/go]
( If :w2: does capture at :b3: , then B has blocked at :b1: in sente. )

Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 3:16 pm
by Uberdude
Answer at a. Easy peasy.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . a . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 0 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
P.S. this is consistent with the laid back 9, simply connecting. You could also think about more aggressive moves for 9 like cutting black's thin 2 space jump.

Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 4:47 pm
by ez4u
otenki wrote:...

Also if you go this route you can get:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
...

Thanks!
Otenki
Normally we end up with this 9 instead.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]

Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:04 am
by otenki
ez4u wrote:
otenki wrote:...

Also if you go this route you can get:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
...

Thanks!
Otenki
Normally we end up with this 9 instead.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Two space high pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 1 . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
That makes a lot of sense, in that case josekipedia should be updated :-)
http://josekipedia.com/#path:qdodldqcrcpcreogqh

Cheers,
Otenki

Re: why not joseki + what about this move ?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:05 am
by otenki
Thanks for the replies guys... gives me things to think about and check !

Cheers,
Otenki