Are go tournaments "notable"?
- emeraldemon
- Gosei
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: greendemon
- Tygem: greendemon
- DGS: smaragdaemon
- OGS: emeraldemon
- Has thanked: 697 times
- Been thanked: 287 times
Are go tournaments "notable"?
The english wikipedia has only scattered information about professional go. I went to see if they had a page about Ke Jie and they don't. I thought he should at least be mentioned for winning the Bailing cup, but there is no page for the Bailing cup. I tried to create a stub of a wikipedia page for it, with some links to gogameguru and intergofed as references. The page was rejected with the message "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability".
I am sure wikipedia admins get lots of non-notable page creations, so they err on the side of caution. It is hard for me to find "notability references" since most information is in Chinese, which I don't speak (this is why I wanted to improve wikipedia coverage...). It seems like i have two options:
1) Try to argue with the admin, find more references, get the wikipedia page created.
2) Let wikipedia be outdated & wrong, focus on updating Sensei's, where at least no one will stop me from making new pages.
Arguably Sensei's might be the better place, but it has orders of magnitude less traffic, and I do think Go tournaments are at least as notable as Tournaments for Magic, Pokemon, Smash bros, etc., all of which have pages. But I am doing all of this as procrastination, I don't want to spend a ton of time hunting down sources and trying to decipher google translate. What should I do?
I am sure wikipedia admins get lots of non-notable page creations, so they err on the side of caution. It is hard for me to find "notability references" since most information is in Chinese, which I don't speak (this is why I wanted to improve wikipedia coverage...). It seems like i have two options:
1) Try to argue with the admin, find more references, get the wikipedia page created.
2) Let wikipedia be outdated & wrong, focus on updating Sensei's, where at least no one will stop me from making new pages.
Arguably Sensei's might be the better place, but it has orders of magnitude less traffic, and I do think Go tournaments are at least as notable as Tournaments for Magic, Pokemon, Smash bros, etc., all of which have pages. But I am doing all of this as procrastination, I don't want to spend a ton of time hunting down sources and trying to decipher google translate. What should I do?
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
Perhaps Charles Matthews can offer some advice as he is quite the wiki-nerd! I believe he has even written about the need to address the Western white male bias of wikipedia (of users and consequently coverage of topics that tend to interest them), which this example seems to suffer from. Sadly the wikipedia admins/culture and deletionists made me choose option 2 long ago.
-
gowan
- Gosei
- Posts: 1628
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:40 am
- Rank: senior player
- GD Posts: 1000
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 450 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
There is a page on Wikipedia (English) for Gu Li.
Most of the pages on the game on English Wikipedia are about historical Japanese go, but brief mention of Chinese weiqi and a few players are on the main Go (game) page. Maybe linking to that and using better references would allow your stub to stay.
Most of the pages on the game on English Wikipedia are about historical Japanese go, but brief mention of Chinese weiqi and a few players are on the main Go (game) page. Maybe linking to that and using better references would allow your stub to stay.
-
Charles Matthews
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am
- Rank: BGA 3 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 189 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
The notability of go pros has been discussed on (the English) Wikipedia. When asked, I said I thought pro 4 dan should be the notability level in general, roughly equivalent to chess grandmaster. So he just passes that.emeraldemon wrote:The english wikipedia has only scattered information about professional go. I went to see if they had a page about Ke Jie and they don't.
What title did you use? As a WP admin I could see your text.emeraldemon wrote: I thought he should at least be mentioned for winning the Bailing cup, but there is no page for the Bailing cup. I tried to create a stub of a wikipedia page for it, with some links to gogameguru and intergofed as references. The page was rejected with the message "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability".
For a rising star, 1) is clearly better.emeraldemon wrote: I am sure wikipedia admins get lots of non-notable page creations, so they err on the side of caution. It is hard for me to find "notability references" since most information is in Chinese, which I don't speak (this is why I wanted to improve wikipedia coverage...). It seems like i have two options:
1) Try to argue with the admin, find more references, get the wikipedia page created.
2) Let wikipedia be outdated & wrong, focus on updating Sensei's, where at least no one will stop me from making new pages.
While we are on the subject, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... n_(writer)
I have known John Fairbairn since the 1970s, and I don't imagine (knowing his views on WP) that he is much concerned whether he has an article there or not. But there is still time for people with good sources, which might not be in English, to get the article kept.
It's hardly hopeless: both the Japanese and Chinese Wikipedias have articles about Ke Jie. Seeemeraldemon wrote: Arguably Sensei's might be the better place, but it has orders of magnitude less traffic, and I do think Go tournaments are at least as notable as Tournaments for Magic, Pokemon, Smash bros, etc., all of which have pages. But I am doing all of this as procrastination, I don't want to spend a ton of time hunting down sources and trying to decipher google translate. What should I do?
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18653975
Translation is not so hard, with Google Translate; at least to see what a source says (enWP will allow non-English sources in this sort of case).
By the way, I found that Wikidata page easily, because Sensei's usefully had the Chinese characters for the name. It doesn't for the Bailing Cup: so one helpful piece of research would be to get the name on http://senseis.xmp.net/?BailingCup in Chinese.
I'm happy enough to work with people who want to improve go coverage on enWP. I did a bit, but I had written so much on go I actually wanted a change.
-
Charles Matthews
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am
- Rank: BGA 3 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 189 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
Oh, I remember the discussion very well. I asked whether there was just the one article you cared about in the many millions! This was face-to-face at the go club, I hasten to add.Uberdude wrote:Sadly the wikipedia admins/culture and deletionists made me choose option 2 long ago.
-
Charles Matthews
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am
- Rank: BGA 3 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 189 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
So this looks like the Wikidata page for the Bailing Cup:Charles Matthews wrote: By the way, I found that Wikidata page easily, because Sensei's usefully had the Chinese characters for the name. It doesn't for the Bailing Cup: so one helpful piece of research would be to get the name on http://senseis.xmp.net/?BailingCup in Chinese.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15285702
The name appears in Japanese, Chinese and Korean. No English label and description yet: please fill in if you can confirm. Wikidata should prove useful for go players.
The adventurous can check the six footnoted references in the Chinese version.
- emeraldemon
- Gosei
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: greendemon
- Tygem: greendemon
- DGS: smaragdaemon
- OGS: emeraldemon
- Has thanked: 697 times
- Been thanked: 287 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bailing_Cup
It's just a stub, originally I thought I would create the page and then add more. Maybe there is a higher threshold for drafts.
By the way Ke Jie is 9P now, Sensei's was unfortunately out of date. I made a quick fix.
It's just a stub, originally I thought I would create the page and then add more. Maybe there is a higher threshold for drafts.
By the way Ke Jie is 9P now, Sensei's was unfortunately out of date. I made a quick fix.
- emeraldemon
- Gosei
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: greendemon
- Tygem: greendemon
- DGS: smaragdaemon
- OGS: emeraldemon
- Has thanked: 697 times
- Been thanked: 287 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
Yes, those are the chinese etc. pages for the Bailing cup. I don't know how to add it to the wikidata, but if we want to continue on wikipedia maybe I should message you there for questions?
-
Charles Matthews
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am
- Rank: BGA 3 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 189 times
Re: Are go tournaments "notable"?
There is more to say here, about translations. I'll start another thread for that, though, in a couple of days time. Basically a translation from another Wikipedia should receive better treatment, and there is recent improved infrastructure.emeraldemon wrote:Yes, those are the chinese etc. pages for the Bailing cup. I don't know how to add it to the wikidata, but if we want to continue on wikipedia maybe I should message you there for questions?
Just for my own interest, I queried Wikidata to see how many go players it has, the answer being 581 (at least). Of those, 242 have an English Wikipedia article. Well worth a systematic project.
(By the way, Wikidata is editable as Wikipedia is, the main difference being it has multiple editing boxes. The top one is for "label", i.e. title in a given language, "description", and "aliases". Not too hard. The one thing of local knowledge is to put {{#babel:en}} on your user page, which turns the defaults into English-only settings.)