KGS game rewiev, 4k
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 12:52 pm
Hi there,
Here is a KGS game I just played(as black). I commented some of the things inside the sgf.
I got the following feeling:
I had a nice position out of the opening(say, move 49), after that messed up some things locally. It didnt hurt my lead as much as it could have, partly thanks to my opponent and maybe to the fact that "cut your losses, take sente and pretend its all part of your plan" is maybe one of the things I do better than others, hence I was still doing ok. Then in the end, there was something happening in the center and after I (luckily?) got the much better end there, I was clearly winning.
If you want to review, I'm most interested in whether this general feeling of the course of the game(and the fellings in the commentary in the sgf) is somehow accurate and the question, what "should have" happenend in the center(starting aroung
127), but any other comment is also very much appreciated
!
Thanks in advance!
Here is a KGS game I just played(as black). I commented some of the things inside the sgf.
I got the following feeling:
I had a nice position out of the opening(say, move 49), after that messed up some things locally. It didnt hurt my lead as much as it could have, partly thanks to my opponent and maybe to the fact that "cut your losses, take sente and pretend its all part of your plan" is maybe one of the things I do better than others, hence I was still doing ok. Then in the end, there was something happening in the center and after I (luckily?) got the much better end there, I was clearly winning.
If you want to review, I'm most interested in whether this general feeling of the course of the game(and the fellings in the commentary in the sgf) is somehow accurate and the question, what "should have" happenend in the center(starting aroung
Thanks in advance!