Page 1 of 1

These 3-3 invasions are getting out of hand...

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:11 am
by Uberdude
Lian Xiao 9p (black) vs Shi Yue 9p today:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X X O . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O O O . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X X . . . . , . . . . O O O . . |
$$ | . . O O O X . . . . . . . O X X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

komoku

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:52 am
by EdLee
Wasn't that pair Go ? Each team ( M + F ) ?
( Lian Xiao + Gao Xing ) v. ( Shi Yue + Wang Chen Xing ) ?

Re: These 3-3 invasions are getting out of hand...

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:58 am
by Uberdude
EdLee wrote:Wasn't that actually a pair Go game ?
Each one partnered with a female pro ?
Looks like you are correct, although it only has those names on the WBaduk1 server, on China1 it has "LianX.GaoX" vs "ShiYWangCX" so presumably Gao Xing 4p and Wang Chenxing 5p. The game was fairly fast, so being less serious pair go could also encourage silly/fun openings.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:59 am
by EdLee
Ah. Yike has both the names and photos. :)

Re: These 3-3 invasions are getting out of hand...

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 8:00 am
by Vesa
I like the new 3-3 outbursts, like Ko vs Murakawa in Kisei A league:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . O . O . . . X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X O . O O X X X X X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . X O O X X . O X O O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . X O X X O O O X O , . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X O O O . O O X O O X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . . . O X X O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O X X . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . X . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
I have grown to recognized these quite easily nowadays :)

Cheers,
Vesa