Timing - time for re-appraisal?
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:12 am
There are many things we read where we understand all the individual words perfectly and so wrongly assume we understand the whole sentence. Worse, we very often don't get alerted to the fact we have fallen into a trap. The following is an example, for me at any rate, and it reminded me that, outside of order of moves, and maybe issues such as tenuki and tedomari, timing is a sadly neglected topic in both Japanese and western go literature,
Shuei was commenting on this game. His first comment was on move 19 (triangled). Up till then both players (Nozawa and Iwasa) had maintained a sort of parity with the initial LZ winrate, although of course this game was without komi.
Shuei's comment was: "Black 19 feels as if it is quickening the tempo somewhat. It was more appropriate to try to slow things down by jumping to A first."
I'm sure I just read over that the first time I encountered it, a few years ago. I expect that what dominated in my mind was some strong association such as "ikken tobi is never bad."
This time, however, I stopped in my tracks for some unknown reason. A lot of very different associations came to my mind instead. It was possibly those, acquired since my last reading, that triggered my pause, but I don't actually know.
What I do know is that I looked at 19 and thought to myself, "How can a honte move like that be called too fast?" I could see with just a second or so more thought that it implies an immediate strong attack on White, and that in turn could spell bad news for Black's group on the centre side.
But then I was surprised to see Black A described as slow. Sure I can see that it doesn't do anything to White immediately, and it's a prophylactic kind of move, but it's a running fight kind of move and in my mind that has associations with upping the tempo.
With the minor exception of LZ slightly preferring a different move to help out that centre group, LZ seems to support Shuei's comment. The actual 19 lost about 6 percentage points.
The state of mind I was left in was that I accepted Shuei's move, and that I felt I understood the faults and merits of the two moves in question. But I still felt uneasy (because of a wrong assumption?) about his description - why did he choose to use timing words instead of talking about safety, attack, defence, etc.
That led me to the realisation that, as I have said, timing is somewhat neglected as a topic. And that led me to wonder whether that neglect is a bad thing. After all, Shuei highlighted the time aspect it. Is it even neglect, anyway. Is it not just a case of having wrong existing associations that need correcting (which will be a different process for every one of us)?
So, is further discussion of timing in the sense of this position warranted? Over to you.
Shuei was commenting on this game. His first comment was on move 19 (triangled). Up till then both players (Nozawa and Iwasa) had maintained a sort of parity with the initial LZ winrate, although of course this game was without komi.
Shuei's comment was: "Black 19 feels as if it is quickening the tempo somewhat. It was more appropriate to try to slow things down by jumping to A first."
I'm sure I just read over that the first time I encountered it, a few years ago. I expect that what dominated in my mind was some strong association such as "ikken tobi is never bad."
This time, however, I stopped in my tracks for some unknown reason. A lot of very different associations came to my mind instead. It was possibly those, acquired since my last reading, that triggered my pause, but I don't actually know.
What I do know is that I looked at 19 and thought to myself, "How can a honte move like that be called too fast?" I could see with just a second or so more thought that it implies an immediate strong attack on White, and that in turn could spell bad news for Black's group on the centre side.
But then I was surprised to see Black A described as slow. Sure I can see that it doesn't do anything to White immediately, and it's a prophylactic kind of move, but it's a running fight kind of move and in my mind that has associations with upping the tempo.
With the minor exception of LZ slightly preferring a different move to help out that centre group, LZ seems to support Shuei's comment. The actual 19 lost about 6 percentage points.
The state of mind I was left in was that I accepted Shuei's move, and that I felt I understood the faults and merits of the two moves in question. But I still felt uneasy (because of a wrong assumption?) about his description - why did he choose to use timing words instead of talking about safety, attack, defence, etc.
That led me to the realisation that, as I have said, timing is somewhat neglected as a topic. And that led me to wonder whether that neglect is a bad thing. After all, Shuei highlighted the time aspect it. Is it even neglect, anyway. Is it not just a case of having wrong existing associations that need correcting (which will be a different process for every one of us)?
So, is further discussion of timing in the sense of this position warranted? Over to you.