Page 1 of 3

Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:07 pm
by Jordus
This list contains all the names that were nominated from the admin/moderator thread, who expressed interest when contacted about their nomination. Vote for the four that you wish to have as Moderators. This poll will run for seven days. At the end of the seven days, the four with the most votes will be your moderators.

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:19 am
by HermanHiddema
Why only four? :?:

I'd much rather have dozens of moderators.

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 am
by Jordus
HermanHiddema wrote:Why only four? :?:

I'd much rather have dozens of moderators.



Four to start. We can adjust the number as seen fit in the future.

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:27 am
by fwiffo
We also have our 5 admins. So far I've had to do only a single "moderator" type action, so I don't think we need a huge number.

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:32 pm
by Jordus
*Bump*

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:57 pm
by Chew Terr
Since three have a strong lead, why don't we start with three and see if there's a need for more?

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:59 pm
by Jordus
I am ok with that. Anyone opposed?

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 11:01 pm
by Jordus
Jordus wrote:I am ok with that. Anyone opposed?


Now that I think about it though, The poll has only 2 days left, and it might not be fair to the other 4 guys who have probably been watching their votes intently all week. Maybe we should let them finish fighting it out.

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:29 am
by kirkmc
It's fine with me.

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:35 am
by schultz
Jordus wrote:
Jordus wrote:I am ok with that. Anyone opposed?


Now that I think about it though, The poll has only 2 days left, and it might not be fair to the other 4 guys who have probably been watching their votes intently all week. Maybe we should let them finish fighting it out.

At this point it may be best to let the time finish out, it's run for so long not a whole lot of reason to cut it short.

Though we do have kirkmc's okay, and he's the number 5 guy behind wossname, so we're probably okay. ;)

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 5:17 am
by SoDesuNe
There's no rising anarchy in this forum, so I think we really should sit this one out. It's all about legitimation : )

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 6:11 am
by DrStraw
fwiffo wrote:We also have our 5 admins. So far I've had to do only a single "moderator" type action, so I don't think we need a huge number.


Who are the five admins? And if there are already have 5 admins why is there a need for moderators? What can an admin do that a moderator cannot?

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:34 am
by SoDesuNe
According to this link (bottom left of the forum): memberlist.php?mode=leaders

ArkhamKing
fwiffo
Jordus
Adrian Petrescu
Joaz Banbeck
Kirby

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:35 am
by deja
DrStraw wrote:
fwiffo wrote:We also have our 5 admins. So far I've had to do only a single "moderator" type action, so I don't think we need a huge number.


Who are the five admins? And if there are already have 5 admins why is there a need for moderators? What can an admin do that a moderator cannot?


Admins are the mechanics and moderators are the police.

Re: Vote for Moderators!

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:50 am
by DrStraw
deja wrote:Admins are the mechanics and moderators are the police.


That is not the case on KGS. I doubt it is here. I am sure the admins have policing powers.