Abyssinica wrote:Bonobo wrote:p.s.: Up for a really slow correspondence game w/ me?
(“slow” as in weeks or months time, the link in my signature leads to my ☯GS profile)
You declined my challenge. Maybe you thought I really was a 6d or something.
Didn’t you read my PM? It’s about lack of time … and sometimes I can’t play for a few days. Also, I wanted to finish my other games first. And I must admit that tiny offer actually was directed at InkWolf personally, guess I should’ve made that clear

But … I’ll create a challenge that fits my time schedule, OK?
________________________________________________________________________________
leichtloeslich wrote:Bonobo wrote:it offers both live and correspondence games (and the latter turn into live games when both players are playing at the same time)
Every time I read this, I die a little inside.
Must be a hard life

“Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional”, so … perhaps you’re a little bit
too soluble, especially among so many aggressive solvents

Let me spell it out for you:
whoa whoa whoa
the difference between a live and a correspondence game is that when you get into a complicated semeai/life&death situation, you have about 20 seconds flat to make your best judgement and play a move in a live game, while in a correspondence game you usually have about 20 days.
It's the time controls that matter, not how fast the board updates.[/rant]
Feeling better now?

Anyway, “live game” does not necessarily mean time restrictions like in tournament games.
But you are right, I did not state it precisely, and in order to keep you among the living for some more time, I’ll try again:
When both players in a correspondence games are present in the game, it “feels” like a live game since 1) the board is updated immediately, 2) both players can “see” each other, 3) there is live chat, etc.
Is this somewhat better?
________________________________________________________________________________
dfunkt wrote:leichtloeslich wrote:[..]
It's the time controls that matter, not how fast the board updates.
[/rant]
Truly. I played correspondence go for 6 months and it did nothing to improve my real time games.
Uhm, was there any statement about improval in leichtlöslich’s comment that I missed? I didn't allege (at least not here

) that correspondence Go (necessarily) improves one’s game play.
BUT it
may depend on how thoroughly one uses the analysis function, and whether one is able to overcome one’s blind spots … <shrug> … I don’t know. But since you mention this, I
think that YES, playing through many variations with varying different first moves has improved my play. At least it
feels so in the few IRL games I play.
Herzlichen Gruß, Tom