Page 1 of 1
Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:30 pm
by dumbrope
Any comments would be appreciated. Overall I think I have some slow, ineffective moves. I haven't played in a while. Now, back to tracking down my "escaped" Malkovich games. I guess I'll just claim I lost network connection. For months. Yeah, that's it...
(;FF[4]GM[1]SZ[19]AP[SGFC:1.16]
GN[Rank]
PB[Black]
BR[6K]
PW[me]
WR[6K]
KM[6.5]
PC[Tygem Baduk]
RE[B+R]
C[I am white.];B[pd];W[dd];B[pq];W[dp];B[fc];W[cf];B[db]
(;W[cc]C[I could tenuki instead.];B[ic];W[qn];B[qk];W[qq];B[qr]
(;W[qp]C[Maybe S3 is better? I know this hane of Q3 is not joseki.]
;B[or]
(;W[rr]C[I have a strong desire to play at P4.];B[rs];W[qf]
LB[qc:A]C[I didn't feel like answering S1, but to invade like this may be overplay. Not sure. Normally, with a double wing I'd consider R17, but this side feels bigger when I fantasize that R6 group isn't weak.]
;B[qh];W[qc];B[qd];W[pc];B[od];W[rd];B[re];W[rc];B[qe];W[nc]
;B[me];W[mc]SQ[qn][qp][qq][rr]C[Maybe a little slow. It could be more urgent to defend the R6 group.]
;B[rq];W[rp];B[sr];W[pk]C[I figure maybe I can defend and overconcentrate black at the same time.]
;B[ql]C[But this move seems a nice refutation.];W[pm];B[pl]
;W[nm];B[ol];W[no]C[Trying to make some kind of lighter shape, but there is some feeling of being pushed around. I am not happy with this opening result.]
;B[nl];W[mm];B[fq]
(;W[hq]SQ[or][pq][qr][rq][sr][rs]C[This may be wrong direction. Marked black group is quite strong.]
;B[cq];W[dq];B[cp];W[do];B[dr];W[er];B[cr];W[eq];B[cn];W[nq]
C[gote];B[dn];W[en];B[em];W[fm]LB[co:A]C[I felt the urge to play A (C5) to create cutting points, but it also reduces white's liberties, so I left for later. It's reading I can't often do comfortably in a game.]
;B[fn];W[eo];B[el];W[gm];B[mr];W[ci];B[lk];W[hd];B[hc];W[fd]
;B[gd];W[ge];B[gc];W[cl]C[Seemed like a vital point at the time.]
;B[dm];W[gk];B[kq];W[lq]C[I don't have a real plan here. This move didn't accomplish much.]
;B[mq];W[mp];B[lp];W[km];B[fr];W[fp]LB[fs:A]C[I really wanted to play A (F1) instead but my reading did not confirm its safety.]
;B[es];W[kh]C[Anyway, with sente I can try some kind of moyo move to expand white and reduce black. I'm not sure of the best spot here, though.]
;B[mh]C[But if black is forced, I can't feel too bad. Black may feel ahead at this stage.]
;W[jk];B[ed];W[ee];B[fe];W[ff];B[gf];W[fd];B[oc];W[ob];B[fe]
;W[nr];B[lr];W[fd];B[nb];W[mb];B[fe];W[fg]C[I felt short on ko threats, which means I maybe should not have allowed the ko.]
;B[he];W[hh];B[de];W[ce];B[ef];W[eg];B[ns];W[bm]C[Not seeing significant weakness on either side, I decide my best chance is to start endgame.]
;B[bn];W[kc];B[gp];W[go];B[hp];W[ho];B[ip];W[rm];B[rl];W[se]
;B[sf];W[sd];B[rf];W[cb];B[dc];W[cd];B[om];W[on];B[qm];W[pn]
;B[rn];W[ro];B[kl];W[sn]C[too small];B[jm];W[jl];B[jn];W[lj]
;B[mk];W[kk];B[ll];W[mj];B[nj];W[da];B[eb];W[ej];B[bk]C[Nice placement]
;W[ck];B[hm];W[fk];B[hk];W[hj];B[bl];W[bj];B[cm];W[ak];B[am]
;W[jb];B[op];W[np];B[pp];W[sp];B[sl];W[sm];B[mi];W[ki];B[ig]
;W[ih];B[io];W[lf];B[mf];W[ha];B[lm];W[ln];B[kn];W[lo];B[ko]
;W[lg];B[le];W[ke];B[jd];W[kd];B[hl];W[ik];B[dk];W[dj];B[ea]
;W[ca];B[hn];W[gn];B[jg];W[nd];B[ne];W[mg];B[ng];W[df];B[ee]
;W[hg];B[hf];W[je];B[ie];W[ib];B[hb];W[jf];B[if];W[jh];B[ga]
;W[co];B[bo];W[il];B[jc];W[kb];B[li];W[kj];B[gg];W[gh];B[ld]
;W[lc];B[po];W[oq];B[al];W[aj];B[im];W[qo];B[ia];W[ja];B[sq]
;W[oo];B[pr];W[kg];B[ml];W[mn];B[dl];W[cj];B[oe]C[Overall in the endgame I didn't do enough mutul damage. I think black had a comfortable game I didn't see many chances.]
)
(;W[dn]LB[hd:A]C[Maybe here is better? Then aim at A to develop left side?]
))
(;W[op]C[I'm not sure why my first feeling is here.]))
(;W[rq]C[Second line, but maybe more of a base.]))
(;W[qn]C[I considered tenuki immediately.])
(;W[nc]C[I also thought about here.]))
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:27 pm
by Boidhre
I've seen P6 recommended for

when the pincer is one space closer it threatens both attacking the pincer stone and O3 in that instance. Here I think it's playable but it's above my paygrade.

Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:16 am
by dumbrope
Another game. Similar. Looking at it, maybe a little too much following my opponent, not enough mutual damage in endgame.
(;FF[4]GM[1]SZ[19]AP[SGFC:1.16]
GN[Rank]
PB[me]
BR[6K]
PW[White]
WR[6K]
KM[6.5]
PC[Tygem Baduk]
RE[W+13.5]
C[I am black.];B[pd];W[dp];B[qp];W[op];B[cd];W[ed];B[gc];W[cc]
;B[cg]C[Try the newer joseki.];W[ce]C[Okay, I haven't seen that one.]
;B[bd];W[dd];B[be]LB[bc:A]C[If it is possible to get away with A (B17) that would be cool. I couldn't see it working.]
;W[bc];B[eb];W[db];B[ec];W[dc];B[gd]LB[fd:A]C[Misclick. Supposed to be at A (F16).]
;W[ef];B[cj];W[gf];B[jd];W[qq];B[rq];W[pq];B[qm];W[mq];B[pj]
;W[qg];B[qi]LB[qe:A][nc:B]C[Also thought about A (R15) and B (O17) for some time.]
;W[rd];B[qc];W[rc];B[mc];W[qb];B[pb];W[qd];B[pc];W[rb];B[fq]
;W[hq];B[dn];W[eo];B[cq];W[dq];B[cp];W[cr];B[do];W[fp];B[br]
;W[dr];B[rr];W[qo];B[ro];W[qn];B[rn];W[pp];B[rp];W[pm]
(;B[ql]C[Soft. Double-hane?];W[en];B[dm];W[em];B[el];W[fl]
;B[fk];W[dl];B[ek];W[cl];B[bn];W[bm];B[bo];W[cn];B[co];W[bj]
;B[cm];W[ci];B[ch];W[dj];B[di];W[ck];B[bi];W[bh];B[cj];W[bq]
C[I don't think the ko threat is large enough.];B[ci];W[ar]
;B[bl];W[ej];B[dk];W[bk];B[am];W[gk];B[fj];W[gj];B[ei];W[kl]
C[But significant moyo.];B[il]LB[gl:A]C[Too deep? I thought atari at G8 would help support, but in the end this just helped white.]
;W[jk];B[mk];W[pl];B[pk];W[mm];B[if];W[gh];B[og];W[jh];B[kg]
;W[jg];B[jf];W[rh];B[ri];W[si];B[sj];W[sh];B[rk];W[ph];B[hp]
C[Testing.];W[gq];B[jp];W[iq];B[hn];W[ip];B[io];W[gp];B[ol]
;W[om];B[os];W[ps];B[pr];W[or];B[qs];W[nr];B[fg];W[ff];B[gg]
;W[hg];B[hf];W[cf];B[bf];W[dg];B[fh];W[hh];B[kh];W[ki];B[li]
;W[kj];B[mh];W[oh];B[da];W[ca];B[ea];W[bb];B[pf];W[pg];B[of]
;W[nh];B[ng];W[nl];B[nk];W[ok];B[oj];W[kn];B[qf];W[rf];B[lk]
;W[kk];B[ll];W[lm];B[ns];W[ms];B[ps];W[pa];B[oa];W[qa];B[ob]
C[I don't know if white's lead is reversible at this stage.]
;W[ge];B[he];W[fd];B[fc];W[lj];B[mj];W[ni];B[mi];W[qe];B[pe]
;W[qh];B[ol];W[ad];B[bg];W[ap];B[ao];W[bs];B[gi];W[hi];B[fi]
;W[gl];B[ig];W[ih];B[ae];W[ac];B[ml];W[nm];B[eg];W[df];B[dh]
;W[ok];B[hj];W[ji];B[ol];W[qr];B[rs];W[ok];B[bp];W[nj];B[mg]
;W[aq];B[ol];W[rj];B[qj];W[ok];B[lr];W[mr];B[ol];W[sk];B[sl]
;W[ok];B[po];W[pn];B[ol];W[al];B[ak];W[ok];B[ba];W[aa];B[ol]
;W[hd];B[hc];W[ok];B[fm];W[gm];B[ol];W[pi];B[ok];W[oi];B[tt]
;W[tt])
(;B[pl];W[ql];B[rm];W[pk];B[ol];W[qk];B[ok]C[Should be okay for black.]
))
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:19 am
by dumbrope
Boidhre wrote:I've seen P6 recommended for

when the pincer is one space closer it threatens both attacking the pincer stone and O3 in that instance. Here I think it's playable but it's above my paygrade.

I thought of the jump without doing the attach, but nice miai idea. Thanks!
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:33 am
by Sverre
A few comments on your second game.
13: Despite the misclick later, you came out ahead in the upper left corner. After this move you have transposed to the d16-b16 joseki except White has exchanged c15 for b15, which is probably bad for him.
23: You now have strong groups on both sides and he doens't have two eyes in the corner. Great result.
28: He is overconcentrated. Black feels ahead now.
35: I would play at s18.
40: White got off easy in this corner, but I think you are still ahead. His shape is just a little thin, for example he can't cut off an attachment at s13.
43: I would jump into the corner here. Black has a strong low stone at c10 and White has a strong low stone at n3, makes the corner look good in comparison. Also he has two corners already and can get s2 if he wants.
52: I don't know much double approach joseki. I think this result is good for you, but you should reduce the bottom soon (now would be a good time).
61: If you double hane you also commit to pushing one more time or take gote to protect your cutting point. I'm not sure which is better. The way you played there is the cut or clamp later on.
77: You have miai between c7 and living in the corner with b2, this move is almost a pass in the middle of a serious fight. I think c11 kills him. I think this is your most serious mistake of the game.
91: Extend at g11 for Tons Of Liberties (tm). If he connects at d9 just play f11.
96: White took your corner and got to extend his wall twice in sente.
99: His cutting point is important, but the right move to start in this area may be just cutting at g8 directly, since you would almost never want to cut on the other side. j8 goes deep behind the sector line but doesn't actually cut. The p7 clamp is also a significant weakness. I think I would play at n7, or n8 if I was feeling timid.
103: Do you need this defence? I would play at n7
105: It may not be the biggest right now, but the cutting point at q6 can be played at this point
107: Suddenly moyo outta nowhere. Very cool.
113: l12 or m11 may be bigger, perhaps? I dunno.
119 "Testing": Do you think you can live if he tenukis at 124 or so?
127: I prefer q6
129: You can still q6 and if he doesn't give up his stones, sacrifice it and p8 to break into his moyo.
144: Now throwin at c14, then f15. Does this kill? I dunno, but it's very worth reading, and it would win you the game if it worked.
149: Too timid and defensive. p12 probably better. I would play q6.
155: r15 better, I think
171: Smaller than r19. I think you are behind at this point.
207: One point gote. b4 and r2 are bigger. p9 may be bigger because White has followups at o10 and then q11
217: At least take the ko once.
223: More ko threats if you play at n2, I believe.
238: Not actually a threat.
241: Not actually a threat.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:17 am
by skydyr
Sverre wrote:144: Now throwin at c14, then f15. Does this kill? I dunno, but it's very worth reading, and it would win you the game if it worked.
I thought this worked at D14 (C14 already has a stone). With an L group in the corner, white only has one eye there, and the aji of capturing lets black kill the other eye. After black F15, E15 and E13 are miai.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:47 pm
by dumbrope
Thanks for the comments. I should have gone for that killing sequence. Not sure why I didn't have the confidence to try.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:28 am
by dumbrope
Finally, a fighting game as Tygem is famous for. I misread some things, but I feel I also lack fighting ideas. I look forward to your feedback!
(;FF[4]GM[1]SZ[19]AP[SGFC:1.16]
GN[Rank]
PB[Black]
BR[6K]
PW[me]
WR[6K]
KM[6.5]
PC[Tygem Baduk]
RE[B+R]
C[I am white.];B[pp];W[dq];B[cd];W[oc];B[co];W[ec];B[cg];W[df]
;B[ed]C[I am not familiar with this response.]
(;W[dd]C[Might as well fight. Maybe I can learn something.]
;B[de];W[dc];B[ce]
(;W[fd]C[I thought a lot about the other atari.];B[ee]
(;W[ep]C[Restrict black a little on the left while leaving follow-up at bottom. Is my upper left group okay? It seems to have miai to make abase. Tempting to extend in the upper right now, but...]
;B[dm];W[nq];B[jq]
(;W[no]C[Lots of choices here.];B[gq]
(;W[pn]C[Hard to resist, but now I'm commited to an outside strategy.]
;B[qq];W[fo];B[oq]LB[np:A]C[First feeling for me to anwser at O4, for fewer forcing moves for black.]
;W[mr]SQ[gq][jq]C[I figured this move has an effect on black's marked stones more, but black has a lot of space, and this gives black more forcing in the corner. It may be a mistake.]
;B[oo];W[on];B[nn];W[mo];B[nm];W[pl];B[lq]C[This forcing move is painful for white and I missed it.]
(;W[ln]C[I know about the ko, but there is supposedly no ko in the opening.]
;B[np];W[mp];B[mq];W[op]C[Ko it is, but I capture first.];B[eq]
C[Not big enough to me.]
(;W[po];B[dp];W[or];B[cq];W[pq];B[in];W[ic];B[qd];W[pe];B[rf]
C[A little unusual.]
(;W[pg]C[This may be soft.];B[ri];W[gl]C[Maybe too deep.];B[fm]
;W[jm];B[im];W[il];B[jl];W[ik];B[km];W[kl];B[kn]
(;W[jk]C[A mistake, I think. M7 instead?];B[lm]C[A little too easy for black. Harder for white to make a moyo now.]
;W[ek];B[pd];W[od];B[oe]
(;W[ne]C[I considered R15, too.];B[of];W[pf];B[nf];W[mf]C[I'll go for the squeeze without thinking much.]
;B[me];W[ng];B[nd];W[og];B[ne]CR[nc]TR[ob][pc]MA[le][md]C[Dumpling, but actually black and white have some number of liberties. It's white's move. Seems okay for white?]
;W[nc];B[le];W[lb];B[kb]C[Here I enter 30 second byoyomi after expending my 20 minutes of main time.]
;W[lc];B[kc];W[kd];B[ke];W[jd];B[oj]
(;W[kg]LB[pj:A]C[My first feeling was at A (Q10).];B[jf];W[hf]
;B[jg];W[kh];B[jh];W[ki];B[mg];W[ni];B[mh];W[oi];B[mi];W[mj]
;B[nj];W[pj];B[ok];W[pk];B[lj]
(;W[mk]C[This may not be important.];B[nl];W[lk];B[kf];W[li]
;B[he];W[hd];B[ge];W[fe]C[Seeking to break into black's left side.]
;B[gf];W[ff];B[gg];W[fg];B[cc];W[gd];B[gj]SQ[ek][gl][ik][il]
[jk][jm][kl][lk][mk][mj][ki][li][kh][kg]C[It is hard to admit this, but it was only at this point I realized white's marked group does not have two eyes.]
;W[gk];B[fj];W[el];B[di];W[gh];B[fh];W[hg];B[ie];W[hj];B[gi]
;W[hi];B[hh];W[ji]C[A lot of dame points to save white.];B[qh]
C[At this point I think black is winning. No further comments.]
;W[pi];B[rl];W[ck];B[ro];W[qp];B[qm];W[ol];B[rp];W[fq];B[dr]
)
(;W[kf];B[lf];W[je]C[Enough? Probably better than game result.]
))
(;W[pj];B[pi];W[oi];B[pk];W[qj];B[qk];W[qi];B[qh];W[ph];B[rj]
;W[pi];B[ol]C[It's hard to read.]))
(;W[qe];B[re];W[qg];B[ne];W[md]C[Something like this.]))
(;W[lm];B[ll];W[jk]C[This has to be better.]))
(;W[qe];B[re];W[qc];B[rd];W[qg]C[Considered this.]))
(;W[cp]C[If I answer.];B[np]C[Black captures... where's my next threat?]
))
(;W[mq]C[To answer here seems heavy.];B[ln]C[Afraid of something like this.]
))
(;W[cp];B[do];W[bp];B[pn];W[pr];B[qq];W[nm];B[pl]C[Not sure I have a follow-up now.]
))
(;W[qq];B[pq]C[Black pretty much has to block this way.];W[qp]
;B[po];W[pr];B[or];W[qr];B[oq];W[qn]
(;B[np]C[Proper to play here, but...])
(;B[gq]C[I think my opponent might choose this. It's a game.]
))
(;W[qn]SQ[oc]C[Double approach is always possible. It is an an open side, though I'm not sure of the placement of white's 5-3 point.]
;B[qq]C[Concern is this strong style variation.];W[oo];B[op]
;W[np];B[no];W[on];B[mo];W[lp]C[Maybe this fight is fair?]))
(;W[ic];B[ep];W[eq];B[fp];W[gq]C[Black can build the left...]
))
(;W[ee];B[fd];W[fc];B[gd]C[It just seems better for black. But I have to concede that black played first in the corner.]
))
(;W[cf];B[dc]C[A trade seems too passive, but I considered it.]
)
(;W[dc];B[dd];W[gc];B[fd];W[gd]C[Something like this I thought about but discarded.]
))
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:26 am
by Sverre
I think the attachment in the upper right is very interesting. Too bad I don't know joseki

$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|....2....
$$|..1.5....
$$|.........
$$|...4.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|....2....
$$|..1.5....
$$|.........
$$|...4.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........[/go]
It looks like the taisha with an extra Black stone at c13. That stone makes me very nervous about the wedge.
$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|...72....
$$|..1.5....
$$|.........
$$|..64.....
$$|..38.....
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|...72....
$$|..1.5....
$$|.........
$$|..64.....
$$|..38.....
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........[/go]
This exchange could be good if you had a framework on the left, which is a common reason for Black to play the 2-space low extension. Not in this game however.
$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|..082....
$$|..1.56...
$$|..9.7....
$$|...4.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|..082....
$$|..1.56...
$$|..9.7....
$$|...4.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........[/go]
How about the hane at

$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|...72....
$$|..1956...
$$|....8....
$$|..04.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|...72....
$$|..1956...
$$|....8....
$$|..04.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........[/go]
Don't think Black can block this way.
$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|..982....
$$|..1.56...
$$|....7....
$$|..04.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$---------
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|..982....
$$|..1.56...
$$|....7....
$$|..04.....
$$|..3......
$$|.........
$$|.........
$$|.........[/go]
If he takes the 3-3 then

comes back to life
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:01 am
by Sverre
Some other comments:
44: Extremely slow. I don't think Black has unconditional life in the corner and anyway you have invested far too much here already.
46: Because of the cutting point at f17, c17 is still almost sente for black
52: Black's previous moves were knight's move to the second line and a two-space jump on the second line. There must be a cut there somewhere.
62: If at m7, Black can extend at k9
77: He's in your framework. Making yourself short on liberties gives him forcing moves. Extending at n15 keeps him weak, and gives you fifth-line territory as a bonus. s13 in the near future now cuts Black, strengthens q13 and cuts off s11.
110: What do you need that stone for? Extending the other way at least has an effect on black
112: I would play j15. Do you think Black has time to rescue h15?
139: I see cutting points.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 4:31 am
by Shinkenjoe
I don't like

. Maybe ok If you jumped out further or put pressure on one of his side groups, but this way it's very slow.
At

I would have pressed through at F3, then F2 to jump out at F7. Additional to saving your group you attack his double undercut middle group.
P.S.: oops topic covered already.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:34 am
by dumbrope
Sverre wrote:139: I see cutting points.
Indeed. And you found a few other places in the same game I wasn't looking hard enough for them myself. I can't improve everything at once in my game, but my next few games I can be more suspicious of my opponent's shapes.
I'm not concerned so much about things you can see because you are stronger that I can't yet see in my games. I'm concerned about things I
could see but never look for and your examples are good for that.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:47 am
by dumbrope
Shinkenjoe wrote:I don't like

. Maybe ok If you jumped out further or put pressure on one of his side groups, but this way it's very slow.
It felt slow when I played it. However, I felt if black played at that point instead, he could seal me in in sente, which is intolerable. So I'd rather look for another haengma than tenuki there, but I'm not sure which one.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:59 am
by dumbrope
Sverre wrote:It looks like the taisha with an extra Black stone at c13. That stone makes me very nervous about the wedge.
Nice insight! I look this up in GoGoD, the outside hane you suggest is in fact the most common pro response to this attachment.
Re: Having trouble against Tygem players
Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:52 am
by skydyr
My basic analysis of the upper left situation is that black played the two space extension to make a base, and white peeped/shoulder hit as a basic exchange to strengthen both positions. Black chose to take something else instead, so the natural move is for white to cut in some manner.