Page 1 of 1
Why losing on time?
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:03 pm
by cyclops
Let's substitute a pass for not playing in time! I hate to see games at KGS ended by time.
Re: Why loosing on time?
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:58 pm
by palapiku
So they pass, and then what? They still have no time left.
Re: Why loosing on time?
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:03 pm
by DrStraw
palapiku wrote:So they pass, and then what? They still have no time left.
So they pass again, and again, ....
Until the opponent gets careless and has to resign.
Re: Why loosing on time?
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:12 pm
by Kirby
cyclops wrote:Let's substitute a pass for not playing in time! I hate to see games at KGS ended by time.
Just play without time limits. Problem solved.
Re: Why losing on time?
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:36 am
by hyperpape
I don't particularly like the idea, but with Japanese style byo-yomi, they would pass, and then be left with a single overtime period (or say 12 seconds for Fischer). You could even give them a whole new countdown period for Canadian timing.
Sudden death is where this doesn't make sense to me, but that's less frequently used.
Re: Why losing on time?
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:19 am
by SmoothOper
Why? I usually interpret losing on time as a sign of improvement. It's when I lose and there was plenty of time on the clock that makes me upset. The latter, means, I have to reevaluate my fundamentals, the former just means, I need practice, with clock management.
Re: Why losing on time?
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:21 am
by Uberdude
I lost the British championship title match on time with one stone of a Canadian overtime period to go.

I found that rather more annoying than losing on KGS by time.
Re: Why losing on time?
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:42 am
by Bill Spight
Uberdude wrote:I lost the British championship title match on time with one stone of a Canadian overtime period to go.

I found that rather more annoying than losing on KGS by time.
I commiserate.
Here's to Fischer Time! (Or some variant.)
Re: Why losing on time?
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:58 am
by Joaz Banbeck
SmoothOper wrote:Why? I usually interpret losing on time as a sign of improvement...
I must be a pro by now.

Re: Why losing on time?
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:27 am
by SmoothOper
Re: Why losing on time?
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:09 pm
by ez4u
Sugiuchi Masao forgot about his clock and lost on time in an as yet undecided position during
his game against 15-year-old Yao Zhiteng. So it seems like neither practice nor improvement solves the problem.
