It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 8:31 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game
Post #21 Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:18 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2659
Liked others: 310
Was liked: 631
Rank: kgs 6k
Bill Spight wrote:
emeraldemon wrote:
So it seems there are two questions. One is where white should play :w13: , and the consensus seems pretty clear that the pincer I played was suboptimal, and taking the corner may be the best choice at that point. Question #2 is whether white has misplayed prior to :w13: . Bill and Magicwand say yes, pointing to problems as early as :w7: , whereas mitsun and maybe splatted seem to think those early moves were OK at least.

Does that about sum it up?


My main point is that White let Black set the pace in a two stone game, and let Black get an easy opening. Magicwand's suggestion for :w7: is good, but I would not exactly call not doing so a misplay. As for a pincer at :w13:, I like the idea, and do not like the kikasare.

Gotta run.

Hey now! Jowa says - don't run.


This post by jts was liked by 3 people: Bill Spight, Dusk Eagle, ez4u
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game
Post #22 Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:14 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 248
Liked others: 23
Was liked: 148
Rank: DGS 2 kyu
Universal go server handle: Polama
mitsun wrote:
I think I am with Splatted on this one. It is true that W treated the B approach as a threat and felt compelled to defend the corner, so you could say that W got pushed around, but the exchange might still be good for W. Not all kikashi are good or profitable. A peep is usually good, because the opponent is required to connect on a worthless dame. The situation here is quite different -- B exchanged a move of dubious future value (as most reviewers agree?) for a move worth 20 points of immediate profit.


I suppose the way to evaluate the quality of a kikashi is the profit you gain from the stone minus the profit your opponent got responding. As long as that is positive, you're good. Clearly white profits. But black's stone is far from dubious in value. In Bill's suggested continuations, black stretches far down the right side. Things are now awkward for white in the top right corner. Approaching on the right is jumping into an attack. Approaching on the left, black could pincer while making a better base for the stone left behind. If black plays close to the stone to capture it more cleanly, white can expand along the top and start a moyo. And even if white does allow black to settle on the top, black can threaten to jump out later on. Something like F14 later on could simultaneously expand a left side moyo and threaten to bring that stone to life. It's hard to quantify, but that sort of left behind stone can be a hassle for the other player all game.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game
Post #23 Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:15 pm 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 124
Location: still above sea level: http://bit.ly/eQYULx
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 8
Rank: 3d EGF
GD Posts: 1700
Clearly there are some high-dan-reviewers around here.

A sparkle of (useless/usefull ?) wisdom lies in a Chinese saying "shuoqilai rongyi - zuoqilai nan " (←→ it's easy to talk, but difficult to do/achieve).

I only speak for myself when stating that I'd be happy to be forced (by B10) too make small (but only) corner territory among 2 groups while the left black 2-point extension is attackable by a (later ) white pincer @ c9.

The black 2-point extension B14 (in the same diagram ) could also be considered 'low' (hence ineffective), and if it is not played (we have seen other ideas) then its original meaning of B10 is unclear to me.

_________________
Greetings,
Tommie

3dan EGF (AGA no 13477) || Tommie on KGS: 'June'|| DGS: 'Zhi Laohu' 纸老虎 = 'paper tiger' || Senseis : http://senseis.xmp.net/?tderz ||
ENFP (MBTI) - 'Find your own style within the Fundamentals of Go! '

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game
Post #24 Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:53 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2414
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Liked others: 2350
Was liked: 1332
Rank: Jp 6 dan
KGS: ez4u
jts wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
emeraldemon wrote:
So it seems there are two questions. One is where white should play :w13: , and the consensus seems pretty clear that the pincer I played was suboptimal, and taking the corner may be the best choice at that point. Question #2 is whether white has misplayed prior to :w13: . Bill and Magicwand say yes, pointing to problems as early as :w7: , whereas mitsun and maybe splatted seem to think those early moves were OK at least.

Does that about sum it up?


My main point is that White let Black set the pace in a two stone game, and let Black get an easy opening. Magicwand's suggestion for :w7: is good, but I would not exactly call not doing so a misplay. As for a pincer at :w13:, I like the idea, and do not like the kikasare.

Gotta run.

Hey now! Jowa says - don't run.

LOL! :clap: :clap: :clap:

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group