RobertJasiek wrote:
Quotation reference:
viewtopic.php?p=147761#p147761Bonobo wrote:
Robert, [...] it might be really interesting to see a book written by you, something like “Go for Dummies” (i.e. for complete beginners) [...] an introductory book that would be the first to read [...] I’m really curious what such a book would be like, because, IF you’re right about Go theory, it might be good to plant the correct perspective on Go right in the beginner’s mind. Since I teach Go to kids I’d love to learn more about how to teach them better
In addition to the many books I would like to write, this is an interesting idea. It is, however, not my first priority, because several authors can write and have written similar books. I consider it more important to fill big gaps in the literature.
I have mentioned before the idea that I might write "Topic XY for Dummies", so I am certainly not opposing the direction. My problem is really that I can finish only one book at a time:)
In a book for absolute beginners, I would in particular emphasise connections. "Keeping stones connected." eases life. Besides, reading must recognise a captured string near the edge, and proceed a little beyond this level. Learn to read 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 moves deep.
I understand where you are coming from, but I think it might be worth while to talk about what is worth and what is not.
Plugging holes for (more) advanced players is certainly important.
Setting a brand new generation on the right path from the get-go is a great goal as well.
I am not sure which is more important.
From the time perspective, I would say beginner book makes more sense - and then when this generation improves, they (and you) will be ready for the next step and further books. Its like being a godfather to a whole new army of Go player. Hmm... Its so good, its so scary.
I have to think about it some more....
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
RobertJasiek
