It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 11:27 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Best-next-move-Question
Post #1 Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:34 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 677
Liked others: 6
Was liked: 31
KGS: 2d
Black to move. I have marked some possible moves where I think the best one is within there. Can some stronger player tell, what the best move is and if any of my suggestions are actually "not so good"? Also interesting: Is the game still even or has someone an advantage here?


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #2 Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:22 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 157
Liked others: 9
Was liked: 11
Rank: 2D
Tygem: shiva
Black h3, white b4, black L3? Or just enclose the bottom right.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #3 Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 8:09 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 157
Liked others: 9
Was liked: 11
Rank: 2D
Tygem: shiva
Wen I say bottom right I suppose I mean o3.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #4 Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 8:40 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
I have ordered plays alphabetically. :)



First, I think that Black is a bit ahead, because of the White kick in the top left corner.

Of the two big plays on the side I prefer A, because B gives White a good play by approaching the bottom right corner. Also, the top right corner is settled, which means that the bottom side is hotter than the right side.

Then we have the enclosures of the bottom right corner. I like the large knight's enclosure better than the small knight's enclosure. I know that the small enclosure is popular these days, but. . . . I classed both small knight's enclosures the same. Not much difference, I suppose.

Next we get the approach to the bottom left corner. But there are other options, which I am satisfied to leave open. I don't think that White will immediately extend on the bottom side, and I would not mind if he did. :)

Next, the jump on the left side. Not a play that I would consider in a game, but it develops the side.

I admire the shoulder hit at G, but it is not so easy to capitalize on it, IMX.

H is the way to reduce the top side, but it is premature.

The jump to I develops the left side. It would be more attractive if White had made a large knight's extension.

The 3-3 invasions are premature, and the attachment on the top side is the wrong way to reduce, I think. Oh, yes, there is the other shoulder hit.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


Last edited by Bill Spight on Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

This post by Bill Spight was liked by: lightvector
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #5 Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 8:47 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Too early to play the top moves. Globally, right side is bigger than bottom since white has little development potential on bottom.

The thing that irks me are the weaknesses in the bottom left extension, combined with the two white stones there. I feel that area is not that settled, but i don't know the best move.

So i'd either play on right, or do something about the bottom left.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #6 Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:06 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1206
Liked others: 51
Was liked: 192
Rank: KGS 5d
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
The first thing that strikes me is Bill's A, but thinking about it, I don't feel like it's a move that current pros would play. I'd probably enclose with C or D.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #7 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:49 am 
Beginner

Posts: 8
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 1
Rank: Tom 1Kyu
Probably O3 or N3.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #8 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:07 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 928
Location: UK
Liked others: 72
Was liked: 480
Rank: 5 dan
KGS: macelee
O3 is my choice. It is a calm move, creating a very valuable move R5. White would have to somehow enter the right side or reduce the corner now. Depending the outcome, other plans can follow. For example, if black becomes strong outside, 3-3 invasion at C3 would become really good.

N3 is similar to O3 - really a personal preference.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #9 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:54 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 677
Liked others: 6
Was liked: 31
KGS: 2d
macelee wrote:
O3 is my choice. It is a calm move, creating a very valuable move R5. White would have to somehow enter the right side or reduce the corner now. Depending the outcome, other plans can follow. For example, if black becomes strong outside, 3-3 invasion at C3 would become really good.

N3 is similar to O3 - really a personal preference.


I had the same idea originally, I just was unsure if Q10/Q9 wouldn't be better, because at least it'd "look" larger^^.

The problem with N3 and a large knight is that you often do not have sente if white enters the corner. With the small knight you know you got sente. Big difference...still I often play large knight because it suits my greed better, because it "looks" more ambitious^^.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #10 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:48 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 44
Liked others: 12
Was liked: 4
KGS: nacrox
I would play H3, after that the corner would need reinforcement, and if he doesn't reinforce it, whatever fight that start will weaken it to dangerous levels, but that's me and i'm weak and I just fight over all the board :P

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #11 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:16 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 677
Liked others: 6
Was liked: 31
KGS: 2d
nacroxnicke wrote:
I would play H3, after that the corner would need reinforcement, and if he doesn't reinforce it, whatever fight that start will weaken it to dangerous levels, but that's me and i'm weak and I just fight over all the board :P


Hm...interesting question. My gut feeling tells me that H3 should be played later, e.g. AFTER small knight at O3, not immediately. But I cannot give an explanation.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #12 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:21 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 928
Location: UK
Liked others: 72
Was liked: 480
Rank: 5 dan
KGS: macelee
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 2 . O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


:b1: is not a good move. After :w2: defence, the bottom side is wide open, and invasion at 'a' become more serious. So this is not good for black.


This post by macelee was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #13 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:24 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
It appears to be a consensus (with the exception of my comment) that the bottom is a bigger area to play than the side. Indeed, I can feel the benefits of playing on the bottom, and probably a couple of weeks ago, I would have made a similar assessment - white can have her stones working together smoothly by approaching the bottom right 4-4, so it makes sense that it's a good place to play.

However, my thought process changed a little bit when I listened to a lecture a couple of weeks ago. Here was the board position in the lecture:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Now before seeing the lecture, if we compare the bottom and right sides, I would definitely have thought that the marked area would be a great place to play for white:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . W . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It works nicely with white's wall on the bottom, and simultaneously approaches the black 4-4 stone.

But the lecturer thought differently. He indicated that white cannot easily finish developing the bottom side in a good way. For example, if they play a basic joseki:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . 5 . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White is clearly too low.

If white tries to play higher, black has a good response at the invasion point at :b6:, below:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . 5 . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . 6 . . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Therefore, he concluded, it was more valuable to approach the right side, and let the bottom be, for the time being:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . W . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It seemed to make sense - white can't get a super result on the bottom, so let's play on the right.

Applying the same thought process here, I figured that, as in the example I watched in this lecture, white cannot develop well on the bottom (if it were white's turn to play). I don't know where white follows up, if black plays as follows. Maybe the last move shown?:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Black tenuki
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . 3 . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . C C . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


It's still easy to invade in this area, no matter where white plays. Because this area wouldn't be as big for white, it shouldn't be as big for black, I figured. So, by the logic of the lecture I watched, I figured this position was similar to what I had seen.

I think what Bill mentioned about the top right area being "finished" by black has merit, so in that sense, the bottom seems more appealing in some ways. But I wonder, concretely, what the differences are between this position and the one I saw in the lecture. My rationale for why the lecture approach was good on the right must be somewhat incomplete, since it perhaps does not apply here.

Any thoughts?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #14 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:39 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 928
Location: UK
Liked others: 72
Was liked: 480
Rank: 5 dan
KGS: macelee
I do not fully agree with your lecturer. His first point is clearly correct:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . 5 . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White is clearly too low.

His second point is somewhat sensible - it is often a good idea to approach from the wider side.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . 5 . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O # . O . a . . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


However in this particular opening, in fact there were many professional games in which white approach the corner from the bottom side, including this one played by Lee Changho (http://www.go4go.net/go/games/sgfview/7501/20).

Note that white should not use this to secure territory at bottom side - this is difficult to do, because of 'a' and the aji of the marked stone. Instead white wants black to invade so that he can create favourable fighting conditions in which his wall can be effectively used.

This is another popular opening:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . 1 . . a . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White can make :w1: / :b2: exchange first, before approaching another corner. White does not worry about the bottom-side invasions at the moment because he has a solid wall there waiting, and 'a' remains possible.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #15 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:06 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Kirby wrote:
It appears to be a consensus (with the exception of my comment) that the bottom is a bigger area to play than the side. Indeed, I can feel the benefits of playing on the bottom, and probably a couple of weeks ago, I would have made a similar assessment - white can have her stones working together smoothly by approaching the bottom right 4-4, so it makes sense that it's a good place to play.

However, my thought process changed a little bit when I listened to a lecture a couple of weeks ago. Here was the board position in the lecture:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Now before seeing the lecture, if we compare the bottom and right sides, I would definitely have thought that the marked area would be a great place to play for white:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . W . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It works nicely with white's wall on the bottom, and simultaneously approaches the black 4-4 stone.

But the lecturer thought differently. He indicated that white cannot easily finish developing the bottom side in a good way. For example, if they play a basic joseki:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . 5 . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White is clearly too low.

If white tries to play higher, black has a good response at the invasion point at :b6:, below:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . 5 . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . 6 . . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Therefore, he concluded, it was more valuable to approach the right side, and let the bottom be, for the time being:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . W . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It seemed to make sense - white can't get a super result on the bottom, so let's play on the right.

Applying the same thought process here, I figured that, as in the example I watched in this lecture, white cannot develop well on the bottom (if it were white's turn to play). I don't know where white follows up, if black plays as follows. Maybe the last move shown?:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Black tenuki
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . 3 . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . C C . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


It's still easy to invade in this area, no matter where white plays. Because this area wouldn't be as big for white, it shouldn't be as big for black, I figured. So, by the logic of the lecture I watched, I figured this position was similar to what I had seen.

I think what Bill mentioned about the top right area being "finished" by black has merit, so in that sense, the bottom seems more appealing in some ways. But I wonder, concretely, what the differences are between this position and the one I saw in the lecture. My rationale for why the lecture approach was good on the right must be somewhat incomplete, since it perhaps does not apply here.

Any thoughts?


The lecturer had a point to make, and it was a good one. But he sort of stacked the deck. (That's OK. You keep things simple to get your point across. :))

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , 3 . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O B . O . . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O B . O . . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


He did not talk about these diagrams. In the first one White makes a high extension, and in the second :w3: invites an invasion. :)

How good a play is depends in part on how well you can develop from it, and that was his key point.

Another point is that, despite the aji of the :bc: stone, the bottom left side is fairly settled. Therefore the gain for White in the first diagram, even though White has made a high extension, is relatively small.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


That means that this exchange is relatively good for Black, since :b2: gains more than :w1:.

Edit: I see that Lee Changho disagrees. :shock:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Black: 0 White: 0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X O O X . O . . . . . 2 . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Likewise, this exchange is relatively good for White. :) IMO, Black should pincer instead.

In this position, IMO the best corner approaches are to the top right corner. I like approaching from the top, but you can make a case for approaching from the right. OC, you can also make a case for the wedge on the right side.

In Pippen's example the White stones in the bottom left have a base, but are not settled. It is not really comparable to your example. If you form a moyo, of course the opponent can invade. In your example where Black invades, White has spent eight stones net on the bottom side, and it is still vulnerable.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #16 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:21 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
macelee wrote:
I do not fully agree with your lecturer. His first point is clearly correct:
However in this particular opening, in fact there were many professional games in which white approach the corner from the bottom side, including this one played by Lee Changho (http://www.go4go.net/go/games/sgfview/7501/20).


That's a good point. I suppose that, this early in the opening, there might be some variation in what pros prefer to play.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #17 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:27 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Bill Spight wrote:
...

In Pippen's example the White stones in the bottom left have a base, but are not settled. It is not really comparable to your example. If you form a moyo, of course the opponent can invade. In your example where Black invades, White has spent eight stones net on the bottom side, and it is still vulnerable.


Thanks for the examples, Bill. It was nice to consider some other options for plays on the bottom, from the example I gave.

Regarding Pippen's example, could we discuss this further?

Question 1
Comparing only the knight's moves, if black does tenuki, how would you follow up as white here? I can't find anything that doesn't feel awkward.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Black tenuki
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


The reason I ask is because, if we contrast with the other direction, it seems natural for white to extend along the right if black were to play in a similar way (of course, black has many other options to play):

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Black tenuki
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . 3 . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . 2 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


In the latter diagram here, both the right and bottom seem like natural developments (ignoring the fact that black passed!). However, in the former, I'm having trouble finding a good follow up for white.

Question 2
From the original question, it looks like your preference was to play here:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . B . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


if black were to pass in this situation, is this also where you'd play for white? Or would you approach, as above?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . W . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #18 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:38 pm 
Lives in sente

Posts: 928
Location: UK
Liked others: 72
Was liked: 480
Rank: 5 dan
KGS: macelee
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Black tenuki
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . b . O . . . . d , . 5 . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . c . . O . . . . . . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


Why is this awkward for white? I quite like this for white. Black needs to defend weakness at 'a'. Also this shape makes black 'b' less valuable because 'c' and 'd' are sort of miai points, white can ignore 'b'. For this reason, black is unlikely to play 'b' any time soon, meaning that white has better chance to get a fat corner.


This post by macelee was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #19 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:46 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
macelee wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Black tenuki
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . b . O . . . . d , . 5 . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . c . . O . . . . . . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


Why is this awkward for white? I quite like this for white. Black needs to defend weakness at 'a'. Also this shape makes black 'b' less valuable because 'c' and 'd' are sort of miai points, white can ignore 'b'. For this reason, black is unlikely to play 'b' any time soon, meaning that white has better chance to get a fat corner.


Thanks, seeing things in this way, I agree.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Best-next-move-Question
Post #20 Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:22 am 
Oza

Posts: 2495
Location: DC
Liked others: 157
Was liked: 443
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
Shaddy wrote:
The first thing that strikes me is Bill's A, but thinking about it, I don't feel like it's a move that current pros would play. I'd probably enclose with C or D.


My first thought was B, with the intent to pincer tightly if white approaches the corner from the left, but I can see the merits of A. I think I prefer enclosing the corner to A, though. I don't like most of the other options because they seem premature with such big points on the board and no unsettled fighting.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group