It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 8:51 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #1 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:39 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
I was looking through some professional games, and here are two different positions I found:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Position A
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 2 O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . 3 . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O X . . O X O X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X O O . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . O X X X X . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . X . O O O O X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X O . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . O X . . O . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X X . O X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . O , O O O X . X X O X |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X O . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Position B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X X O . X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O X O O O X . . . . X O X . . |
$$ | . . . O O O X X X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . X X O O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . 1 3 C . X . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X 2 . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]



Both games feature a shoulder hit reduction on some third line stones, however in Position A, I feel the reducer plays lightly with a one-space jump. In my own games, I am more likely to play a shoulder hit this way. In position B, :w3: feels heavier to me than if it were at the marked intersection to the right.

Why does one pro play one space jump after shoulder hit, and the other play solid extension? There might be relative merits specific to these particular positions that I don't see, but in general, how does one decide which of these to play?

_________________
be immersed


This post by Kirby was liked by: illluck
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #2 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:52 pm 
Lives in sente

Posts: 1223
Liked others: 738
Was liked: 239
Rank: OGS 2d
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
That's a question I have as well. For those two examples, could it be because in the second diagram white didn't want black to peep?


This post by illluck was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #3 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:27 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1206
Liked others: 51
Was liked: 192
Rank: KGS 5d
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
One thing I see- in the top example, if the shoulder hitter is allowed to descend to the third line, it threatens the corner, while in the bottom example the shoulder hittee is thick on both sides.


This post by Shaddy was liked by 3 people: Bill Spight, illluck, Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #4 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:36 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Shaddy wrote:
One thing I see- in the top example, if the shoulder hitter is allowed to descend to the third line, it threatens the corner, while in the bottom example the shoulder hittee is thick on both sides.


Could you elaborate on your idea a bit? Are you saying that, when the opponent is thick, it might be good to extend solidly? This one isn't intuitive to me (though the illluck's peep idea does seem to make sense).

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #5 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:43 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1206
Liked others: 51
Was liked: 192
Rank: KGS 5d
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
I agree with the peep idea too.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #6 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:44 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Shaddy wrote:
I agree with the peep idea too.


Yes, me too. But could you explain more about your idea? :-)

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #7 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 10:12 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Kirby wrote:
I was looking through some professional games, and here are two different positions I found:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Position A
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 2 O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . 3 . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O X . . O X O X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X O O . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . O X X X X . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . X . O O O O X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X O . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . O X . . O . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X X . O X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . O , O O O X . X X O X |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X O . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


As Shaddy notes, :b3: is an attacking play.

Quote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Position B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X X O . X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O X O O O X . . . . X O X . . |
$$ | . . . O O O X X X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . X X O O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . 1 3 C . X . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X 2 . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


In this diagram a jump to :ec: would not be particularly light, but would approach Black's thickness for no good reason. It would be thin, therefore. If :w1: and :w3: are too heavy, then White should not begin with :w1:.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


This post by Bill Spight was liked by 5 people: illluck, Kirby, Shaddy, Unusedname, VincentCB
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #8 Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 10:25 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1206
Liked others: 51
Was liked: 192
Rank: KGS 5d
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
I didn't have a good explanation for the second one, only the first one.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #9 Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:07 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
I spoke with a pro about this.

He said that the solid extension was good when the reducer has supporting stones nearby and you are trying to put pressure on the reducee. In this case, you are not worried about your stones being heavy, because you are not in danger of being attacked.

In contrast, the one space jump is flexible, and is good for situations where there are more enemy stones in the area. You are not trying to put pressure on the reducee so much as to be flexible and able to go about in the area without being attacked severely.

I don't get that impression so much in Position A, but perhaps in this particular situation, the one space jump actually puts more pressure than the extension, so the idea is similar (kind of like what Shaddy mentioned).

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #10 Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:47 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Kirby wrote:
I spoke with a pro about this.


Did you show him these examples? I did not get the impression that they were typical of situations where there is a real choice between the extension and the jump.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #11 Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:50 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Bill Spight wrote:
Kirby wrote:
I spoke with a pro about this.


Did you show him these examples? I did not get the impression that they were typical of situations where there is a real choice between the extension and the jump.


No, I didn't show him these particular examples, so his opinion may be different from these particular positions.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #12 Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:53 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1585
Location: Barcelona, Spain (GMT+1)
Liked others: 577
Was liked: 298
Rank: KGS 5k
KGS: RBerenguel
Tygem: rberenguel
Wbaduk: JohnKeats
Kaya handle: RBerenguel
Online playing schedule: KGS on Saturday I use to be online, but I can be if needed from 20-23 GMT+1
I was thinking that in the second example there are no nearby supporting stones (and when I read the pro oppinion I was "what?"), and preventing the peep/keeping the shape as clean as possible makes it easier for that group to survive. Whereas in the 1-jump, there is some supporting thickness close by, so by jumping he can maximise the reduced area.

_________________
Geek of all trades, master of none: the motto for my blog mostlymaths.net

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shoulder Hit Madness
Post #13 Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:21 am 
Dies in gote
User avatar

Posts: 49
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 28
Rank: AGA 7 dan
In position A I think :b3: is correct because there is no way for white to link his stones together.

My thoughts on position A:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Position A variation #1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 5 4 2 O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . 3 . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O X . . O X O X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X O O . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . O X X X X . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . X . O O O O X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X O . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . O X . . O . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X X . O X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . O , O O O X . X X O X |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X O . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Position A variation #2
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 5 4 . 2 O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . 3 . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O X . . O X O X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X O O . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . O X X X X . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . X . O O O O X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X O . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . O X . . O . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X X . O X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . O , O O O X . X X O X |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X O . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Position A variation #3
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 5 . . 2 O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . 3 . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O X . . O X O X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X O O . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . O X X X X . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . X . O O O O X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X O . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . O X . . O . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X X . O X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . O , O O O X . X X O X |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X O . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


If you were to play the simple extension instead of the jump, it would allow white to easily connect.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Position A variation #4
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . 4 2 O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . 3 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . O X . . O X O X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X O O . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . O X X X X . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . X . O O O O X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X O . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . O X . . O . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X X . O X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . O , O O O X . X X O X |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X O . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


For position B there doesn't seem to be a good way to attack these 2 stones. If you were to play the jump instead, that wouldn't be the case.

My thoughts on position B:

Maybe the best black can do?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Position B variation #1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X X O . X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O X O O O X . . . . X O X . . |
$$ | . . . O O O X X X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . X X O O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . 1 3 . . X . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X 2 . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Let's consider the jump instead. :b4: is one attacking method, but it doesn't seem good here.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Position B variation #2
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X X O . X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O X O O O X . . . . X O X . . |
$$ | . . . O O O X X X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . X X O O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . 7 . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . 9 4 5 . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . 6 1 8 3 . X . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X 2 . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It could be that white felt that he was a bit too heavy this way. Note that white can't play at 'a' because black can simply cut at 'b'.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Position B variation #3
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X X O . X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O X O O O X . . . . X O X . . |
$$ | . . . O O O X X X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . X X O O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . b . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 6 . . 4 . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . 1 5 3 . X . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X 2 . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Your general thinking of how to choose a follow up for a shoulder hit isn't wrong. If you want to play lightly, then you should jump; if you want to play solidly, then you should extend. However, general principles are often broken at high levels of Go because of slight changes in positions and thorough reading.


This post by Tabemasu was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group