It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 5:49 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #1 Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:13 am 
Beginner

Posts: 4
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 0
Rank: 7k
KGS: ThePolo
Hello,
i am thinking of getting a new table top go board. My price range is about ~100 bugs or so.

I was reading about the materials used crafting and even in this forum saw many opinions.
I narrowed my buying options down to these two boards
http://shop.gogameguru.com/agathis-go-board-24/
http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-12-c/
where i am asking for your opinion! (i am open for new buying options too of course)

First of all i like that shin kaya looks really nice and is not painted over. however this side
http://www.kiseido.com/go_equipment.htm
tells me that shin kaya is way inferior and it is too soft.

Agathis on the other hand seems to be harder, but i play with glass stones so breaking stones is not my concern. I like that the Agathis board is thicker too.

I would love to hear some opinions on the painted top of the agathis. Pros seem to use it and like it, what are your experiences? I want something that looks good!

Another concern of mine is the sound. I really hope for a nice sound putting down the stones and i feel uneasy buying a board without trying it out or at least see a video of it.

Lastly, I was wondering if shin-kaya really gets squished by smacking down stones to hard, because i love to put them down with a little force :)

What would/did you get?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #2 Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:51 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 27
Location: RVA
Liked others: 8
Was liked: 16
If you would like a relatively hard material but also want something cheap, thick, and handsome, why not try this 2" bamboo board from YMI. I ordered this board and only received it today. I am very pleased with it right out of the box, especially considering the price.

_________________
The Master said, To stuff oneself with food all day without worrying about anything, is difficult indeed! But what about weiqi players then? It is better to be one of them than to do nothing!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #3 Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 3:41 pm 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 76
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 14
Rank: somewhere around 30k
KGS: thecatlver
IGS: madcat
About the Agathis, while it may be a popular choices for Korean tournament, I don't think that there are many that "liked" it. Playing an agathis board is like a really thick piece of wood with what I would compare with lamination. The sound of agathis (at least for me and the board that I tried out) is nearly the same as snapping your glass stone on a white wood door (I don't know where you live, but in america, those door are everywhere) I personally dislike painted wood immensely (which is why I'm still on the hunt for a good spruce-related board, unpainted :cool: ) But who know, If you like the snappy-ness, I guess agathis would be the best for you :)

You won't get a sound sample of stone on board except from games on youtube. so check that out.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #4 Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:15 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 370
Liked others: 91
Was liked: 254
Rank: Weak
I bought the thicker one-piece shin-kaya board (http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24/) from GGG and I am quite satisfied with it.

To me, it is the perfect board for everyday use. It has not shown the slightest sign of warping in my extremely dry home. It looks pleasing enough when I play on it and it does not require much care. I like it enough that I would only consider upgrading to a really nice kaya board, but nothing less.

As for the sound, it will be pleasant enough unless you're really picky about it. I personally don't like the bamboo boards because they are very hard, but that's a matter of taste.

One reason to avoid the painted agathis board is because the paint will eventually wear off unevenly if you keep the board long enough. Also, I would recommend against the thinner shin-kaya board. If you're getting something that thin, you might as well stick with a cheaper folding board (http://shop.gogameguru.com/folding-go-board/). Again, that's just my opinion.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #5 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 1:47 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 359
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 72
Was liked: 199
GD Posts: 11
KGS: Hushfield
Is anyone else bothered by the 3d renders of the go boards as the main image reference material on the GGG website? That's roughly equivalent to amazon putting drawings of book covers in the preview window instead of the actual cover.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #6 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:21 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 699
Location: Switzerland
Liked others: 485
Was liked: 166
Rank: DDK
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
lemmata wrote:
I bought the thicker one-piece shin-kaya board (http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24/) from GGG and I am quite satisfied with it.
...


A product like this one would be my choice too. maybe one day...

_________________
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #7 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:38 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 27
Location: RVA
Liked others: 8
Was liked: 16
Are GGG's pictures 3D renders?

Also, I am confused about the 2.4" "single piece" Shin-Kaya board GGG is selling on Amazon for 239 USD (before S&H). It is described as being "made from a single piece of uncut wood" but then there is this picture:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61la1jAnrAL._SL1500_.jpg

_________________
The Master said, To stuff oneself with food all day without worrying about anything, is difficult indeed! But what about weiqi players then? It is better to be one of them than to do nothing!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #8 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:48 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 27
Location: RVA
Liked others: 8
Was liked: 16
ThePolo wrote:
http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-12-c/
I note GGG does not mention anything about the wood regarding this board, despite emphasizing that "Alaskan spruce" is superior to "Tibetan spruce" in the pitch for their 2.4" Shin-Kaya. ThePolo, you may want to send GGG a message asking about this before you decide to buy. Please post the answer here.

_________________
The Master said, To stuff oneself with food all day without worrying about anything, is difficult indeed! But what about weiqi players then? It is better to be one of them than to do nothing!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #9 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:46 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 370
Liked others: 91
Was liked: 254
Rank: Weak
Hushfield wrote:
Is anyone else bothered by the 3d renders of the go boards as the main image reference material on the GGG website? That's roughly equivalent to amazon putting drawings of book covers in the preview window instead of the actual cover.

One of us must have eye problems because I don't see any 3d renders and my own board looks like what they have in those pictures.

I really hope that it isn't me.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #10 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 12:25 pm 
Beginner

Posts: 4
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 0
Rank: 7k
KGS: ThePolo
Manchu wrote:
ThePolo wrote:
http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-12-c/
I note GGG does not mention anything about the wood regarding this board, despite emphasizing that "Alaskan spruce" is superior to "Tibetan spruce" in the pitch for their 2.4" Shin-Kaya. ThePolo, you may want to send GGG a message asking about this before you decide to buy. Please post the answer here.


Hi, thanks for your answer! turns out i over read "veneer". so this board isn't made of one block of wood any way..
hence i kind of dislike it

however: a new board poped up in their shop today: http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24-p/
and i am now considering just getting the nice shin kaya one: http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24/

still i would love to give the agathis and the shin kaya one a try before i buy them :(
so if anyone has any more experiences to share, i would be happy :)

EDIT: i am not seeing any 3d stuff either ^^ however i would love some more pictures!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #11 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:56 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 27
Location: RVA
Liked others: 8
Was liked: 16
ThePolo wrote:
however: a new board poped up in their shop today: http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24-p/
This one is also made of several pieces of spruce and still makes no claims about being "Alaskan spruce." I would be interested to hear details about its "unique core" and what is meant by "special care" (as opposed to, say, ordinary care).

_________________
The Master said, To stuff oneself with food all day without worrying about anything, is difficult indeed! But what about weiqi players then? It is better to be one of them than to do nothing!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #12 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:31 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 533
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 136
Rank: 13k
Manchu wrote:
ThePolo wrote:
however: a new board poped up in their shop today: http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24-p/
This one is also made of several pieces of spruce and still makes no claims about being "Alaskan spruce." I would be interested to hear details about its "unique core" and what is meant by "special care" (as opposed to, say, ordinary care).


You would have to call them to get the straight answer and to separate facts from their marketing pitch.

However, in the woodcraft business, a massive block of wood can be made by surrounding a core of highly stable material, like compressed or oriented strand composites, with strips of the more appealing, but less stable and more expensive, wood species for show. A bit like molding metal weights inside plastic go stones. While this may sound like a ripoff, it's a valid construction method and they are being honest about it, sort of. It may not be pure kaya all the way through but it might actually be a better product. You can end up with a heavy, ultra-stable chunk that sounds nice and is ultimately both practical and economical.

_________________
David Bogie, Boise ID
I play go, I ride a recumbent, of course I use Macintosh.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #13 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:32 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 359
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 72
Was liked: 199
GD Posts: 11
KGS: Hushfield
lemmata wrote:
One of us must have eye problems because I don't see any 3d renders and my own board looks like what they have in those pictures.

I really hope that it isn't me.

I'm talking about this one: http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24/ , but I think there are others too. I'll admit I'm not 100% sure about it, but looking at the shadows and the way the background is blended in, I'm still more inclined to say these images are CGI and not actual photographs. Maybe they just did an outstanding job on postprocessing the pictures in adding the background.

What does the rest think. Photograph or 3d render?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #14 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 5:12 pm 
Dies in gote
User avatar

Posts: 32
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 8
Rank: 1d
KGS: salerno
I work with Photoshop quite often, and those look like normal pictures with very nice postproduction, so you can be sure you get what you see.


This post by salerno was liked by: Bonobo
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #15 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 5:36 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 27
Location: RVA
Liked others: 8
Was liked: 16
I asked about the picture on Amazon clearly showing multi-piece construction for a board marketed as one solid piece. Here is GGG's response:
Quote:
The Board I got delivered was one piece I think the picture uploaded on amazon was wrong, the pictures on gogameguru.com are correct

_________________
The Master said, To stuff oneself with food all day without worrying about anything, is difficult indeed! But what about weiqi players then? It is better to be one of them than to do nothing!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #16 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:04 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 477
Liked others: 192
Was liked: 357
Rank: 5d
Wow, there are a lot of questions here! Someone sent me an email asking for clarification, so I'll try my best to answer. This will probably take a while. Here goes...

ThePolo wrote:
Hello,
Lastly, I was wondering if shin-kaya really gets squished by smacking down stones to hard, because i love to put them down with a little force :)

Someone (maybe you?) asked a question related to this the other day on this page: http://shop.gogameguru.com/agathis-go-board-24/

The short answer is that any wooden board can be damaged if someone slams a stone down hard enough, but you really have to try. It's not something that normally happens, even when fighting spirit meets fighting spirit head on :)

It might sound a little paradoxical at first, but softer woods (e.g. shin kaya and especially kaya) can deal with that kind of abuse a bit better. That's because harder wood (e.g. agathis), once dinted, will hold a dint 'better'. Softer woods have a tendency to gradually return to their previous form. Anyway, you'll probably want to choose a board based on other factors.

Another rule of thumb is that the softer woods produce what most people regard to be a more pleasant sound and feel nicer to play on, but that's a subjective quality that really depends on personal preference. Any board is ok, as long as you like it.

TheCatLver wrote:
You won't get a sound sample of stone on board except from games on youtube. so check that out.

Great idea, thanks! We should make some videos of all the boards when we have time.

Hushfield wrote:
Is anyone else bothered by the 3d renders of the go boards as the main image reference material on the GGG website? That's roughly equivalent to amazon putting drawings of book covers in the preview window instead of the actual cover.

Funny that you should mention Amazon here. In the thumbnail (featured image) for each product, we had to crop the backgrounds out. That's because, if you want to sell your products on a third party marketplace like Amazon, you have to make the background pure white to be allowed to list your products.

On Amazon, they only require the main image to have a white background (which is what we've done). If you look at other images for any product, you'll always be able to see the photo with the exact same dimensions and perspective, without the background cropped out. Some other marketplaces require this for every image, but we haven't worked up the enthusiasm to waste our time on that yet... Anyway, you'll notice that other vendors that sell on those marketplaces do exactly the same thing.

Manchu wrote:
Are GGG's pictures 3D renders?

Also, I am confused about the 2.4" "single piece" Shin-Kaya board GGG is selling on Amazon for 239 USD (before S&H). It is described as being "made from a single piece of uncut wood" but then there is this picture:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61la1jAnrAL._SL1500_.jpg


The pictures on Amazon are wrong. To list on Amazon, you have to tame a ridiculously big spreadsheet (I think it had more than 100 columns) and it takes many weekends to finish. If you or another vendor make one small mistake (as we did in this case) the images for one product can end up on the page for another product. Even if you then delete them, Amazon sometimes decides to keep them (because they know best or something). It's very hard to get Amazon to remove images sometimes, but I'll try to get those deleted.

Another thing while we're talking about Amazon. They have this thing called the General Pricing Rule (bottom of this page) which has been the subject of some controversy. It basically says that if you sell a product on Amazon you can't sell it for less anywhere else. Since Amazon has very high fees (it generally works out to more than 20% of the price once you add everything in), small businesses selling on Amazon either have to increase all their prices by 20% or ignore the rule and risk being smacked down by Amazon. The irony is that there's a perception that things are cheaper on Amazon, but in reality it's just that most people are too scared to undercut Amazon, even though they could, so everything ends up being priced the same.

I often see people on Go forums recommending products listed on third party marketplaces when the vendor also has their own website. Some people even spend a week emailing us with questions and then end up buying from the marketplace even though they know about our website. The effect of this is that the merchant makes almost no money on the sale (maybe just a few dollars in many cases). So, I don't care whether you buy from us or another vendor in the Go community (though we'd definitely appreciate your business!), but please try to support Go vendors directly instead of buying (or directing people to buy) from a third party site. More money will be able to flow back into the Go community this way, instead of into the coffers of mega corporations in some remote tax haven.

Manchu wrote:
ThePolo wrote:
http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-12-c/
I note GGG does not mention anything about the wood regarding this board, despite emphasizing that "Alaskan spruce" is superior to "Tibetan spruce" in the pitch for their 2.4" Shin-Kaya. ThePolo, you may want to send GGG a message asking about this before you decide to buy. Please post the answer here.

The wood used to make all our shin kaya boards is Alaskan Spruce (we don't sell any Tibetan Spruce boards because we haven't liked the quality whenever we got samples). Although, technically (as far as I've been able to find out), not all 'Alaskan Spruce' is specifically from Alaska. Some of it can come from the western part of Canada or the US Northwest (near Seattle), but it's the same type of wood. As with most commodities today - even food - it's all mixed together in the international trade system if it's regarded to be similar enough.

Thanks for the insight, I'll update the product descriptions to be more helpful and clearer with respect to wood.

Manchu wrote:
ThePolo wrote:
however: a new board poped up in their shop today: http://shop.gogameguru.com/shin-kaya-go-board-24-p/
This one is also made of several pieces of spruce and still makes no claims about being "Alaskan spruce." I would be interested to hear details about its "unique core" and what is meant by "special care" (as opposed to, say, ordinary care).

Yes this one is also Alaskan Spruce, but only on the external panels. As bogiesan already explained (thanks bogiesan), the core is a compressed composite and that's why this board can sell for 50% of the price of this single piece board. Because of this construction method, they can use a smaller amount of the highest grade (Alaskan) shin kaya to make the board. The criteria for 'higher grade' is lighter colored wood and fewer defects. You don't get a single piece of shin kaya, but you get a very nice looking, affordable alternative. Based on feedback from customers, we decided to start stocking these three alternatives for shin kaya boards in this size, so that people have more a choice and more flexibility within a budget. I know that many people will still prefer the single piece board though.

There's only one manufacturer who knows how to make these new boards and, because of how good they look for the price, they're very proud of them. They're keeping the exact technique for making them a secret so that their competitors can't start making them (we did ask about it). As with everything else we sell, we had these boards tested to make sure they met all safety standards for children's toys before stocking them (before you ask, with the test we were being cautious about the binding agents that must be used in the core).

Regarding care, the point is that this board is stable enough that it requires no thought from the owner about how to look after it and will last for a very long time. At most, you might have to dust it before playing a game. For other boards, it depends a bit on the type and size of the wood, but it's a good idea in general not to store a Go board of any value near a heater in the winter. Also, with floor boards especially, it can be good to place a small container of water underneath the center of the board when you're not using it. It also depends on whether you live in a climate with a lot of variability though.

salerno wrote:
I work with Photoshop quite often, and those look like normal pictures with very nice postproduction, so you can be sure you get what you see.
That's right, it took us many weekends to finish all of them... I only recently added all the updated photos to the store and there are still more products to do later :blackeye:

Manchu wrote:
I asked about the picture on Amazon clearly showing multi-piece construction for a board marketed as one solid piece. Here is GGG's response:
Quote:
The Board I got delivered was one piece I think the picture uploaded on amazon was wrong, the pictures on gogameguru.com are correct

I haven't answered your question yet, because I was writing answers for you here first. That reply was left by one of our customers. We're trialing a new feature where you can ask questions and people who've bought that product have the opportunity to give you their unbiased perspective (instead of us just saying what we think all the time). The person who answered you was someone who's actually bought and owns the board. It's supposed to make things a bit more transparent. Is it too confusing?

_________________
David

Go Game Guru: Learn Go | How to Get Better at Go | Go Game Shop | Go Boards | Baduk TV


This post by gogameguru was liked by 4 people: Bonobo, illluck, joellercoaster, Manchu
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #17 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:40 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 27
Location: RVA
Liked others: 8
Was liked: 16
David, thank you for your reply.

Regarding the question that I posted through your website, I received the answer as a form email. That email simply said my question had been answered and included the answer. It did not specify who gave the answer but it seemed reasonable to assume it was GGG. After reading your message above, I went to the product page and I think it is very clear there who is answering the question. (With no disrespect intended to "Stuart M." I am honestly glad this was not GGG's response!) It seems like anything that seems small actually entails a lot of effort when it comes to this sort of thing but it may be worth the effort to make sure the form email customers receive distinguishes between other customers' opinions and answers provided by GGG.

As to the goban, I plan to buy the 2.4" Alaskan spruce from GGG now that I know it is indeed a single piece. I will remember to buy it through the GGG website rather than Amazon.

I think the concept of posting videos of your tables, especially showcasing their sound, is an excellent idea.

_________________
The Master said, To stuff oneself with food all day without worrying about anything, is difficult indeed! But what about weiqi players then? It is better to be one of them than to do nothing!


This post by Manchu was liked by: gogameguru
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #18 Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:51 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 477
Liked others: 192
Was liked: 357
Rank: 5d
Thanks, I'll look into fixing that email template now. We definitely don't want people to be confused about who's answering their questions!

_________________
David

Go Game Guru: Learn Go | How to Get Better at Go | Go Game Shop | Go Boards | Baduk TV

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #19 Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:15 am 
Beginner

Posts: 4
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 0
Rank: 7k
KGS: ThePolo
gogameguru wrote:
Someone (maybe you?) asked a question related to this the other day on this page: http://shop.gogameguru.com/agathis-go-board-24/


Yes, that was me. and i think this tool is very nive! :) and i really want to thank you for all your effort! You really are a great vendor! :o

I will defenetly buy my board at your online shop, but if you are going to put up those video samples i will probably wait for that, that sounds awesome :)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Shina Kaya vs Agathis (Color, Sound & Durability)
Post #20 Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:19 am 
Judan

Posts: 6727
Location: Cambridge, UK
Liked others: 436
Was liked: 3720
Rank: UK 4 dan
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
gogameguru wrote:
Another thing while we're talking about Amazon. They have this thing called the General Pricing Rule (bottom of this page) which has been the subject of some controversy. It basically says that if you sell a product on Amazon you can't sell it for less anywhere else. Since Amazon has very high fees (it generally works out to more than 20% of the price once you add everything in), small businesses selling on Amazon either have to increase all their prices by 20% or ignore the rule and risk being smacked down by Amazon. The irony is that there's a perception that things are cheaper on Amazon, but in reality it's just that most people are too scared to undercut Amazon, even though they could, so everything ends up being priced the same.


Amazon were pushed into dropping this requirement for EU sellers following an investigation by the UK's Office of Fair Trading and its German counterpart (http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... 2013/60-13). I don't know if your competition laws in Australia are as strong as here, but it might be worth writing to your competition authorities lobbying against this policy.


This post by Uberdude was liked by: Bonobo
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group