I do not think that the importance of play in math education can be overemphasized, especially at the elementary level. Unlike Weather Woman, I want 5th graders to know a lot of fun things that they can do with math.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

I often think that society consistently underestimates youth. Our youth may pay lip service to fun but in fact demands relevance. You can try and make education as fun as you want, you will never compete with Grand Theft Auto or whatever new star is on the block. If you make it relevant (and fun) kids will take education seriously.

In Flanders/Belgium, two courses are kids' perennial nightmare: French and math. French used to be important. Nowadays both parts of the country speak English to each other. You can lament it but French has become almost as irrelevant in Flanders as Spanish or Chinese. Stop teaching it, stop trying to make it fun. It's gone.

All kids around the world are told math is relevant to their lives. Sadly, they don't feel it in reality. We're still teaching the math of Euler and Gauss, through an interface resembling Euler's and Gauss'. We replaced pencil and paper with computer screens mimicking pencil and paper. Use computers for what they're good at. Replace arcane symbolic representations with actual simulations. Show linear and non-linear systems. Show singularities. Show 3D objects moving in 3D rendered space. Don't force students to do arkane manipulations like calculations or 2D visualizations of 3D, merely because this was what we needed to do before the computer was there. Don't inflict the solutions of the past on the needing of today.

See Bret Victor's "Kill math".

I have to ask, how many of the people commenting on these education threads have taught at an American state college in the last 20 years? In particular, how many have taught a remedial math class?

The pass rate for remedial math classes at Ivy Tech is 20-30%, depending on course, throughout Indiana. The average for my classes is 40-50%. Before you disparage such rates, let me share some facts. 1) Close to 25% of the students show up for exactly one class in the first two weeks, which means they cannot be dropped and they will get their financial aid check, and they are never seen again. 2) Another 10% or so were "special education" students--I'm not talking about regular disabilities here, but students who are two-and-a-half or even three standard deviations below the mean on IQ tests--but because they get the same high school diploma as regular students (!), they get admitted even though their reading level is no better than 2nd-3rd grade. (Word problems or applications are impossible when a student cannot even figure out the subject and verb in a sentence.) 3) A small, but significant, number of the remaining students have mental health issues requiring medication. Preventing student-student contretemps is a daily issue. (I suspect, but will offer no evidence here, that many American children--especially males, and doubly so African-American males-- have been unnecessarily medicated in order to control the classroom "factory.") 4) For all practical purposes, these are all first-generation college students. We are supposed to teach them appropriate behavior--personally, I don't care how students dress and talk--and I try my hardest to teach them how to study and what it takes to succeed. (I also break my class lessons up with short history segments when I see their eyes are "glazing over." I am continually surprised that no one ever recognizes the name of Euclid or what he is known for doing.) 5) At commuter campuses, such as Ivy Tech, Purdue Calumet, and IUN, students must commute. Sounds easy until one understands that many students have no or unreliable vehicles, and public transportation is inadequate or non-existent in this region. Also, there are issues with jobs and families for them to deal with on a continual basis.

I really try my best to reach all of my students, but I have come here too often to vent my frustration with a common lack of preparation by my students. This clearly is not a forum for teachers! I really will stop here, and only discuss education issues elsewhere with those that have actual experience with teaching.

Back to Go. (Or is that do not collect $200, go straight to jail?! I add this because I hope that I have not offended anyone here with my rants!)

I didn't know the discussion was reserved to Americans. I have taught math in public schools for 3 years and private remedial for my whole life. But only in Belgium, so I cannot really comment on real, American math education.

Regardless, I think all people are entitled to discuss math, and to discuss math education. If we'd reserve any subject only to those that have active experience with it, society would be a lonely place.

Your comment however shows how deeply rooted the problem is. We (society and mathematicians) have alienated the masses from the subject, through excessive abstraction, symbolism and specialism. Before we reform math education for the n-th time, we may need to reform math itself first, so that it becomes an activity in society (which can then be taught with good reason) instead of some esoteric wisdom, preserved to teachers, who hardly practice applied or theoretical math outside their classes in their real lives.

Speaking from a university students' perspective (germany) sitting in any math lecture is a huge waste of time, as in it is not getting you closer to passing the course, with or without a good grade.

Any exam that is not multiple choice tends to be tight on time, so the key to passing is usually not "just" understanding it, but also lots of practice, which (at least in my case) is better done at home alone rather than when a professor is blabbering over what he is doing(no offense). This is probably not applicable to the younger kids, as they might not have as much drive to self study (I sure didn't when I was younger).

Is there any correlation between the attendance and passing? Or is it more about the time invested? I would think it to be the latter, but I'm sure the teachers and professors might have more accurate data in that regard.

That we do, indeed.

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

I don't think this is really the problem. Further down the line, in life, more things are important than just education, so it often happens that the person with the most charisma or street smarts, or whatever will get to be your boss. That's how it always was, and this is more "normal" than "cultural". And it is absolutely not an argument for not having to learn anything in school other than stuff like charisma (which school children also don't learn, I have to add.)


You can say that about anything, not just math. Why learn geography, if you can always use google map? Why learn physics when you can just open wikipedia? Why learn biology if you want to be a car racer? Why learn a foreign language when you never plan to step foot out of Albuquerque? And so on...

Why have schools at all, lets just all be dumb and happy.

I think you miss the point here. Most of the stuff you learn in school you will probably not need in everyday life. Just like most of the stuff you learn in college you will probably not need in your job. However - the stuff you learn teaches you certain things you will need, like abstract thinking, problem solving ability, assimilating and combining new knowledge quickly, extracting an d applying new knowledge, using sources, stuff like that. And true confidence in your own abilities, the knowledge that you have the general skills to tackle almost anything. This is what you learn in school, really, or what you should learn. And you do it by solving hard, abstract problems, in many areas, not just math. This is why I think kids in school should be pushed to learn more and go further, not entertained and amused so they don't complain about having to learn.

THe way things are, we end up with kids who after 12 YEARS OF FORMAL EDUCATION cannot add fractions and cannot write a simple paragraph and don't know where Canada is, but graduated with straight "A"s and think of themselves as geniuses. I know, I have seen it happen. Multiple times. Mind boggles!

And what is REALLY SCARY is not when the guy with more charisma is your boss, but when one of those kids is!

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

So your argument is , let's teach useless stuff which magically will make kids smarter and let's then be appalled when they neither can do the tricks nor appear to be smarter.

I'll take that as a vote for reform.

I have been keeping track of this in my classes for about ten years. There are several things I count, among them attendance and completion of assignments. When I add up all the things I consider important I find that almost all students who complete 90% or more get a grade A or B, and the overwhelming majority of students who complete less than 70% get a D or an F.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

I gave up trying to reach all my students for the simple reason that *all* of my students rarely attended on a regular basis if at all. My upper division courses were better attended, as you would expect, but I was lucky to get 40% attendance rates for my 100 level gen ed courses. Midterms were always a bit comical. I would preface the midterm by welcoming everyone to the course and introducing myself. My regular attendees would laugh while the newcomers were confused.

I share all of your frustrations and then some. The simple fact is that most students don't want to be there, which is nothing new. Our system is essentially a credentialing system from top to bottom, and when you couple that with faculty tenure and promotion that effectively places teaching at the bottom of the list, you end up with faculty who wax passionately about the importance of teaching while doing everything they can to avoid it, and students who are shocked when you fail them because they genuinely believed that just showing up for the midterm and final was more than enough to pass.

I think it was you, Aidoneus, who posted a link to one of those xtranormal videos featuring a professor/student interaction concerning why the student had failed the course. The sad part is just how close that "parody" is to actual professor/student interactions. The only thing that didn't ring true was when the professor said that most of his students appreciated the value of an education.

Of course, these experiences will vary depending on the type of institution. Smaller liberal-arts colleges and some state colleges are often places where quality teaching (and serious students) takes place. My teaching experiences came from a large, research-one university, where intro-level courses of 400+ students was commonplace. Very little learning takes place within such administrative monstrosities because educating is never the intent of those types of "courses."

Having said all that, I don't blame the students for this mess--they're the victims. They've been trained very well to respond to a system that doesn't value education as an end. And I'll leave it there because I want to enjoy the rest on my evening.

_________________
"This is a game that rewards patience and balance. You must think like a man of action and act like a man of thought."
-Jonas Skarssen

It sounds like you are talking about college. At lower levels, at least in the US, it seems like the main lessons are to sit still, be quiet, be on time, and follow instructions.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Sorry to spoil the grumpy old man party, but when I was at university a few years ago I and my peers were all highly numerate. I don't think we should write off humanity just yet.

Have you ever read / signed a labour agreement, maybe even one complicated on purpose? Have you ever gambled or played the lottery? Have you paid "bargain really" subscription mode for the nice phone (your calculator)? Did you ever take a loan? (Did you repay it?) Did you ever add up the transaction fees for your elaborate stock market gambling? Did you ever fall for an unsound argument because you have to take number-based arguments as evidence, even when they are not? (How would that change politics, economy, I wonder?) ...

It should be really easy to convince people that math matters (maybe start with student loans).

The examples you give are about probability and power series. These are two areas of math for which a lot of real life examples can be found and I agree they should take up a much more important part in the curriculum today.

How's math this year?
Enjoy!

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21

Have you ever owned a financial calculator?

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

They sure taught us a lot of useless junk in school.. should've taken cooking and wood\metal crafting instead of calculus and geometry.

Maybe I'm wrong, but honestly..

_________________
http://tinyurl.com/japanesechess

I'm currently going through some training at work, and it is reminding me why I should avoid going back to University. I am quite a terrible student. This kind of classroom learning is not how I learn, and it seems to me that most of the courses I took in University (and even back in grade school) were taught in a similar manner.

It's totally an issue of my own, not an issue with the teaching in general, too.

(I work in Telecom, with a Comp Sci degree, and the course is about the LTE Air Interface.)

I had to tutor some college students in math - which was their major. They picked this major because they were so good at math in school and they thought it was easy and fun. They could not add fractions, let alone multiply them. When i asked them what did they do in school, they said math was fun, the teacher was telling jokes, doing head-stands, and they all got excellent grades.

This is what I am talking about, among other things.

Now, granted, not every pupil/student/graduate is like that. But from my experience, an amazing and scary percentage of them are.

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

It might depend on what standards we use.
Many of the students I have met thought of themselves as math prodigies. And since everybody around them was comparable, they were all great. And if they fail a test, the test was unfair, biased, and possibly racist, obviously.

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!