It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 2:50 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: I'm in a slump
Post #1 Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:25 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 577
Liked others: 22
Was liked: 36
Rank: Fox Tygem 6d
KGS: emerus
Tygem: emerus
OGS: emerus
I think this game record is a good indicator of pitfalls in my Go. I've fallen to 4d on Tygem. I'm black.

I've posted my comments in the SGF. I'm looking for new perspective and general feedback. Please don't ignore the basic fundamentals.



edit: :black: 157 at E9 can kill white, can't it? Or 159 at H9?


Attachments:
impeccable(4D)_wildorang(4D) 4-15.sgf [3.19 KiB]
Downloaded 581 times
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #2 Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:59 pm 
Judan

Posts: 6727
Location: Cambridge, UK
Liked others: 436
Was liked: 3720
Rank: UK 4 dan
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
13 hane under as you have the ladder?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #3 Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:45 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 577
Liked others: 22
Was liked: 36
Rank: Fox Tygem 6d
KGS: emerus
Tygem: emerus
OGS: emerus
Uberdude wrote:
13 hane under as you have the ladder?


It hadn't crossed my mind. Why is that choice better?

In my experience and looking at it now, I don't notice anything special about it. The ladder breaker in the top right seems to offer adequate compensation for white. And the variation where black ataris at c8 is complicated and unclear that it's an improvement over the simpler joseki.

Also, do you have a chance to look at the rest of the game?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #4 Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:55 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2432
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 360
Was liked: 1021
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Even if :b73: has its weakness, :b75: is almost wasting a move in this crucial fight. Playing at the elephant's eye looks much more effective. Next Black will turn or cut.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #5 Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 7:21 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2414
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Liked others: 2350
Was liked: 1332
Rank: Jp 6 dan
KGS: ez4u
Instead of 75 the cut below seems like the only reasonable play.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . 5 . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . 2 . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . 3 O X 4 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X . . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

With the alternative for 73 at 1 below, what happens after 4?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O . 1 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X 4 . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21


This post by ez4u was liked by 2 people: Bill Spight, emerus
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #6 Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 7:41 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 577
Liked others: 22
Was liked: 36
Rank: Fox Tygem 6d
KGS: emerus
Tygem: emerus
OGS: emerus
Thanks Knotwig, I didn't give that move enough consideration. I should have at least identified 75 as being slack in my review though. :scratch:

ez4u wrote:
Instead of 75 the cut below seems like the only reasonable play.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . 5 . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . 2 . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . 3 O X 4 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X . . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Wow, that looks so reasonable and satisfying for black. It isn't consistent with my greedy goal of cutting and being bloodthirsty so I didn't give it enough consideration. I wonder how to fix that?
Quote:
With the alternative for 73 at 1 below, what happens after 4?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O . 1 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X 4 . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O . 1 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X 4 . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . b . 5 6 . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . 7 . a . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I could imagine black swallowing the right 4 stones, but the aji would be really bad and maybe white could even play 'a' and live inside the top?

Your solution is so much more reasonable. I gotta think about how to identify compromises like that.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #7 Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 11:13 am 
Judan

Posts: 6727
Location: Cambridge, UK
Liked others: 436
Was liked: 3720
Rank: UK 4 dan
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
emerus wrote:
Uberdude wrote:
13 hane under as you have the ladder?


It hadn't crossed my mind. Why is that choice better?

In my experience and looking at it now, I don't notice anything special about it. The ladder breaker in the top right seems to offer adequate compensation for white. And the variation where black ataris at c8 is complicated and unclear that it's an improvement over the simpler joseki.


My understanding is that normally white should have the ladder to play that outside attachment as the joseki where you ladder 2 stones is somewhat nice for you. Yes a double high approach against top right is nice for a ladder breaker, but it's not devastating like a broken shape through a shimari one.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #8 Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:13 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 677
Liked others: 6
Was liked: 31
KGS: 2d
IMO 33 is the losing move. It should have been played H5 instead, because then White has to connect his lower stones and that gives Black a chance to develop his three stones in the middle by pushing White's four stones which again would deny White to get easy territory on the right side (which effectively happened).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: I'm in a slump
Post #9 Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:54 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2414
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Liked others: 2350
Was liked: 1332
Rank: Jp 6 dan
KGS: ez4u
emerus wrote:
Thanks Knotwig, I didn't give that move enough consideration. I should have at least identified 75 as being slack in my review though. :scratch:

ez4u wrote:
Instead of 75 the cut below seems like the only reasonable play.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . 5 . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . 2 . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . 3 O X 4 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X . . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Wow, that looks so reasonable and satisfying for black. It isn't consistent with my greedy goal of cutting and being bloodthirsty so I didn't give it enough consideration. I wonder how to fix that?
Quote:
With the alternative for 73 at 1 below, what happens after 4?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O . 1 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X 4 . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O . 1 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X 4 . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . b . 5 6 . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . 7 . a . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I could imagine black swallowing the right 4 stones, but the aji would be really bad and maybe white could even play 'a' and live inside the top?

Your solution is so much more reasonable. I gotta think about how to identify compromises like that.

This looks like trouble too. How can Black both protect the corner and prevent White from pushing through at 'a' and living on the top side?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X 7 . . X X . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . a 5 X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . 6 2 1 O O . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O 3 X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . X . . . O . . |
$$ | . O . O X . X X X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O O O O X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . O O . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X X X X . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O O X . O . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21


This post by ez4u was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group