It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 12:59 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

How should this system be called
Poll ended at Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:44 am
M'Mahon 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
McMahon 57%  57%  [ 4 ]
MacMahon 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
Jones 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Adjusted Swiss 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
No preference 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
Charlton Heston Pairing 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 7
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: What's in a name?
Post #1 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:44 am 
Gosei

Posts: 1543
Liked others: 111
Was liked: 324
Ranka recently reported that the World Amateur Go Championship used the MacMahon system for its pairing algorithm ( http://ranka.intergofed.org/?p=12658 ). This pairing algorithm was originally named after Lee McMahon ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_E._McMahon ). From what I understand, he used this approach in a sort of club ladder setting in New York, whilst the British Go Association used it in a tournament setting, to replace Swiss. This is used by some to suggest that the name of this system should be McMahon. However the German player Christopher Gerlach, has a computer program called MacMahon. As this is the definitive version of the pairing algorithm, I believe that he suggests it is correct to now use MacMahon, even if he should perhaps have called his program McMahon in the first instance. This is because not all pairing algorithms are the same. (I am not entirely sure what the difference is between some FIDE standard of Swiss and McMahon, but I take it that there is some genuine important difference.)

A further complication is that McMahon, MacMahon, and indeed M'Mahon, are all effectively equivalent when you look back through time. Whether you want to call it the Ellis Island effect, or just say that it is was styled according to the fashion of the times, it really boils down to the same thing. Johnny may have chosen to write M'Mahon, but he could have equally written McMahon, or added an extra a like the Priest did. This of course mirrors the confusion in 1970s Europe over how M*Mahon should be written, with official BGA publications regularly using MacMahon.

Of course today, everyone LOVES standardisation, or is that standardization, so which should it be?

_________________
North Lecale

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: What's in a name?
Post #2 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 3:22 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 112
Liked others: 9
Was liked: 23
The BGA has for a very long time now only used McMahon as the name, although errors cropped in the early days.

If Christoph's program were the only one then I might suggest change, but it isn't.

I'd consult Geoff Kaniuk before asserting anything was definitive in this area.

BTW I love standards too - there are just so many of them to choose from...


This post by mumps was liked by: Bantari
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: What's in a name?
Post #3 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:45 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2221
Location: Germany
Liked others: 8268
Was liked: 924
Rank: OGS 9k
OGS: trohde
Universal go server handle: trohde
What OS does Christoph’s program run on? If it’s a Mac, then it would seem quite natural to me to name it “MacMahon”.

_________________
“The only difference between me and a madman is that I’m not mad.” — Salvador Dali ★ Play a slooooow correspondence game with me on OGS? :)


This post by Bonobo was liked by: Bantari
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: What's in a name?
Post #4 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 7:28 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 163
Liked others: 19
Was liked: 32
I always assuned it's MacMahon in UK and McMahon in Ireland..

_________________
If something sank it might be a treasure. And 2kyu advice is not necessarily Dan repertoire..

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: What's in a name?
Post #5 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:21 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1639
Location: Ponte Vedra
Liked others: 642
Was liked: 490
Universal go server handle: Bantari
I assume I saw both spelling McMahon and MacMahon, but never really noticed.
Both are equivalent to me in this case, although I probably prefer MacMahon.

The funny sthing about standards is that they are often only as meaningful as your ability to either enforce them or entice people to use them.

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: What's in a name?
Post #6 Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:06 pm 
Oza

Posts: 2264
Liked others: 1180
Was liked: 553
Javaness2 wrote:
Of course today, everyone LOVES standardisation, or is that standardization, so which should it be?

maybe we need to make a new standard that encompasses all the others.
https://xkcd.com/927/


This post by xed_over was liked by 2 people: Bonobo, joellercoaster
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group