It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 2:20 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Interesting Go Variant
Post #1 Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 6:44 pm 
Beginner
User avatar

Posts: 16
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 2
KGS: nihilo
I'm posting the rules of a go variant here, for anyone who might be interested in the variant. play around with it for a little bit.

There's three modifications to the rules:

1. Suicide is allowed.
2. Liberties wrap around the edges of the board to the opposite edge.
3. Star points may not be played upon nor may they give liberties to stones.

Well, that's pretty much it. All that's missing is a name for the variant and some beta testers. Any suggestions slash volunteers willing to try it out for a couple of days?

*ninja edit* Counting system and komi can be whatever you want. Chinese, japanese, new zealand, whatever. ;)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Interesting Go Variant
Post #2 Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 5:41 pm 
Lives with ko
User avatar

Posts: 155
Location: The Netherlands
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 0
Rank: KGS 6 kyu
KGS: Sevis
0. Am I correct that all liberties wrap over, and not just the one on the other side? Does the marked black stone have three liberties? Or, even more simply -- is this go played on a torus?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$-------------
$$| . . . . . |
$$| O . . . . |
$$| B O , . X |
$$| O . . . . |
$$| . . . . . |
$$-------------[/go]


1. Should territory looparound just as liberties do? i.e. Are the A1-A7 intersection black territory or dame? (star points ignored for simplicity)

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$-----------------
$$| . X . X O . O |
$$| . X . X O . O |
$$| . X . X O . O |
$$| . X . X O . O |
$$| . X . X O . O |
$$| . X . X O . O |
$$| . X . X O . O |
$$-----------------[/go]



2. Do the star points in one's territory count as territory?
3. Where is handicap placed? :)
4. Would the standard board sizes still be recommended? It seems like something where the star points can be placed evenly would work better. (19x19 is a prime number, so you can't have a reasonable number of star points that remain regular as the torus is rotated. 9x9 works fine, but 15x15 would work better than 13x13.)

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$---------------------
$$| . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . |
$$---------------------[/go]



Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$---------------------------------
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$---------------------------------[/go]



Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$---------------------------------
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . , . . . . , . . . . , . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . , . . . . , . . . . , . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . , . . . . , . . . . , . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$---------------------------------[/go]


I'd gladly play a Malkovich in this system once the rules have been somewhat cleared up.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #3 Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 6:00 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Sevis, good questions. I'm curious whether it's a torus, too.
Maybe some topology experts here can help. It looks like Go+Portal. :)
How about start with 7x7 and forget about the handicaps for now.
See what problems arise, see if you can even finish one game, then try a few more games.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re:
Post #4 Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 8:26 pm 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 5546
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 1104
Was liked: 1457
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
EdLee wrote:
...
How about start with 7x7 ...


My gut feel is that small board toroidal go becomes one big seki.

_________________
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Interesting Go Variant
Post #5 Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:24 am 
Beginner
User avatar

Posts: 16
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 2
KGS: nihilo
long time no see.

Some rules clarifications:

yes, ALL liberties wrap around. The handicap system reverts to free placement of stones by the weaker player.

liberties wrap around, Territory wraps around as well. Also, think of the star points as black holes where no liberties can exist, nor any stones can be placed. Any stone placed on a star point is immediatly suicided.

I would reccommend 15x15 board size for now. Also, star points can not be counted as territory. nor eyes.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group