It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 4:31 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: A close club game
Post #1 Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:18 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 588
Location: NY
Liked others: 124
Was liked: 46
Rank: 2D KGS
Hey, haven't posted a game here in a while so I figured I might as well. This was a game I played at my school's club a few days ago against a chinese student. I'm white.


_________________
"There are no limits. There are plateaus, but you must not stay there, you must go beyond them. If it kills you, it kills you. A man must constantly exceed his level." -- Bruce Lee

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #2 Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:27 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Jedo wrote:
Is this atari bad?
Yes. :w20: is wrong order; correct is first atari at C5 (= :w22:) -- which is sente --
then atari at F5, and W ends in sente. (That is, switch the order of :w20: and :w22:.)
In the game you ended in gote, huge difference.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: A close club game
Post #3 Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:29 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 476
Liked others: 193
Was liked: 83
Rank: Dutch 2 dan
GD Posts: 56
KGS: hopjesvla
Interesting game! Let's write up some ideas of mine...

On the lower left joseki: EdLee's comments are accurate.

- 30 and onwards: did you consider making shape with E17? If you play that, most likely black will not reply submissively and make a ponnuki in the corner. But then you get still get decent shape as compensation. Alternatively, just drawing back with C16 might be good as well here. But I think you should do something to make shape here, and I agree that J17 doesn't seem to be the way.

- 43 and 51: very bad moves, black lets you off the hook. I would've ataried at F16 instead of 43.

- 52: isn't this too slow? How about D11 instead? That's a vital point for destroying black's shape.
- 54: maybe at D11 first??
- 62: maybe this is too dull? How about B2 followed by C11? Somehow something must have gone wrong in this sequence because black gets a very good result...

- 88: bad shape because of the gap it leaves behind. O10 looks like better shape to me, much less bad aji.

The worst mistakes (IMO) of this game are:
- 127: black must defend her stone, otherwise white connects everything!
- 128 and onwards: you must take the ponnuki at once! :shock:
Connecting everything is really big in this kind of shape! Imagine what happens if black defends the stone at 139. Everything is connected, that's what matters. Go is a game of cutting and connecting. For example, if you take the ponnuki at move 128, suddenly points like K10 start to look dangerous for black. This is because after taking the ponnuki white is strong and connected :)

_________________
My name is Gijs, from Utrecht, NL.

When in doubt, play the most aggressive move


This post by gaius was liked by: Jedo
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: A close club game
Post #4 Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:36 am 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 5546
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 1104
Was liked: 1457
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
30: As I recall, without the C17/C18 exchange, joseki is the pincer at C11. Indeed, either pincer works well with your strength in the lower left, but C11 has the additional advantage that in some lines you can slip under with C13.

There is also tewari analysis which gives you a suggestion of C11. As you probably know, in the mixed three space extension, there are three recommended invasion points, 'a', 'b', and 'c' in this diagram:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . a d c O . . .
$$ . . . O . b . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . .
$$----------------------[/go]

...but the high middle invasion at 'd' is usually considered ineffective, because the defender can play like this:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . 8 1 4 O . . .
$$ . . . O 5 2 3 . . . .
$$ . . . . 7 6 . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . .
$$----------------------[/go]

...or different sequences which lead to similar patterns with the same result: the defender stays connected and the harder the invader tries, the more stones he loses.

If you transfer that logic to move 30 in your game, it looks like this:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | ------------
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . f X . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .[/go]

The sequence is different, but the potential is the same: you are threatening to play at 'f'. ( Black's 3-4 stone does complicate matters for both sides, so the reading may get tricky, but the idea still holds )

_________________
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: A close club game
Post #5 Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:40 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2116
Location: Silicon Valley
Liked others: 152
Was liked: 330
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Actually, Jedo's move at 30 seems more common.

Image

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group