It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 2:19 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #1 Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:53 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
The diagram below :b2: is a commonly-identified (local) mistake. Of course, as with many such moves, there must be special cases for it. The position below is from a game between Yi Se-tol (Lee Sedol) and Ch'oe Ch'eol-han (both 9p). The position looks pretty normal, so I'm having trouble finding the reason for :b2: . I assume it has something to do with attacking H3, which would (and did) lead to a running fight (after white responded at C3, black pincered at K3). Moreover, in my database (GoGoD, SmartGo, and some individual games I've added), :b2: is the second most commonly played move in this joseki, albeit a distant second (nearly 600 for J4, and 109 for D2). Anyone have any insight into when this it is better than J4? Is it just when black wants to develop long the bottom or lower-right?



Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #2 Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:47 pm 
Tengen

Posts: 4382
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Liked others: 499
Was liked: 733
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4621&p=77638&hilit=sanrensei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).

_________________
Occupy Babel!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #3 Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:53 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2659
Liked others: 310
Was liked: 631
Rank: kgs 6k
But even if pros are reevaluating the pros and cons of this move, the cons are still there... Bantari posted a (imo) great discussion of the weaknesses of this shape a while back.

http://www.bantari.com/go/writings/blooper_001.php

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #4 Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:26 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9552
Liked others: 1602
Was liked: 1712
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
If black was Lee Sedol, then his choosing it was reason enough. I'm pretty sure he doesn't play by proverbs. ;-)

Seriously, though, my feeling is that this move is played if you want to prevent this:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . X , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . W X . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


I guess you probably already figured that, but it's explanation enough for me. :-)

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #5 Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:07 am 
Judan

Posts: 6270
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 797
Black 2 makes it about impossible for White to defend a group developing from H3 by cutting at F4.

Otherwise it is all about whether one expects Black C3 to be reasonable later.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #6 Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:25 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2414
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Liked others: 2351
Was liked: 1332
Rank: Jp 6 dan
KGS: ez4u
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , a . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . 3 . . X . O . 4 b . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

This is a relatively little-used joseki that dates back to the 50's at least. Black generally wants to pincer from a Black position in the lower right, as in the case cited. Most often the pincer used has been :b4: but "a" and "b" have also been played (according to GoGoD). Go Seigen's comment (in Bill's post referenced above) that an immediate "c" is important has not been embraced by the rest of the pro's, although it has been played a few times. The game cited continued as below. It is Game 1 from the 25th KBS Cup Final, played 2006-10-23.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 3 . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . 2 . . 7 . . . . 8 . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . 6 . . , . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #7 Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:54 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
ez4u wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . d . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , a . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . 3 . . X . O . 4 b . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

This is a relatively little-used joseki that dates back to the 50's at least. Black generally wants to pincer from a Black position in the lower right, as in the case cited. Most often the pincer used has been :b4: but "a" and "b" have also been played (according to GoGoD). Go Seigen's comment (in Bill's post referenced above) that an immediate "c" is important has not been embraced by the rest of the pro's, although it has been played a few times. The game cited continued as below. It is Game 1 from the 25th KBS Cup Final, played 2006-10-23.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . d . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 3 . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . 2 . . 7 . . . . 8 . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . 6 . . , . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


About Go Seigen's comment:

I think that the existence of a White stone on the left side star point ("d") is what makes the second jump better than the pincer. It is that stone that makes :w4: in the second diagram a strong attack. Without it, :b5: is good. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #8 Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:28 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
hyperpape wrote:
Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4621&p=77638&hilit=sanrensei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).


Very interesting - I had missed that. :)

Thanks for the comments. It amazes me how a widely rejected move can become accepted (and perhaps rejected again later). This one seems particularly interesting, since this is a "typical mistake" 10 kyus are taught to avoid.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Post #9 Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:07 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 852
Location: Central Coast
Liked others: 201
Was liked: 333
Rank: KGS [-]
GD Posts: 428
judicata wrote:
hyperpape wrote:
Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4621&p=77638&hilit=sanrensei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).


Very interesting - I had missed that. :)

Thanks for the comments. It amazes me how a widely rejected move can become accepted (and perhaps rejected again later). This one seems particularly interesting, since this is a "typical mistake" 10 kyus are taught to avoid.



I think this is one of those cases (much like the kick in response to a low approach), which you first want to make the move, you want to do so for the wrong reasons. Later you find out sometimes there are reasons it might be good...

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group