Joseki Mistake - special case?

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
Post Reply
User avatar
judicata
Lives in sente
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
Rank: KGS 1k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: judicata
Location: New York, NY
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 150 times

Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by judicata »

The diagram below :b2: is a commonly-identified (local) mistake. Of course, as with many such moves, there must be special cases for it. The position below is from a game between Yi Se-tol (Lee Sedol) and Ch'oe Ch'eol-han (both 9p). The position looks pretty normal, so I'm having trouble finding the reason for :b2: . I assume it has something to do with attacking H3, which would (and did) lead to a running fight (after white responded at C3, black pincered at K3). Moreover, in my database (GoGoD, SmartGo, and some individual games I've added), :b2: is the second most commonly played move in this joseki, albeit a distant second (nearly 600 for J4, and 109 for D2). Anyone have any insight into when this it is better than J4? Is it just when black wants to develop long the bottom or lower-right?



Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by hyperpape »

Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4621&p=77638&hilit=sanrensei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).
User avatar
jts
Oza
Posts: 2664
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
Rank: kgs 6k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by jts »

But even if pros are reevaluating the pros and cons of this move, the cons are still there... Bantari posted a (imo) great discussion of the weaknesses of this shape a while back.

http://www.bantari.com/go/writings/blooper_001.php
Kirby
Honinbo
Posts: 9553
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Has thanked: 1583 times
Been thanked: 1707 times

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by Kirby »

If black was Lee Sedol, then his choosing it was reason enough. I'm pretty sure he doesn't play by proverbs. ;-)

Seriously, though, my feeling is that this move is played if you want to prevent this:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . X , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . W X . O . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


I guess you probably already figured that, but it's explanation enough for me. :-)
be immersed
RobertJasiek
Judan
Posts: 6273
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
Been thanked: 797 times
Contact:

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by RobertJasiek »

Black 2 makes it about impossible for White to defend a group developing from H3 by cutting at F4.

Otherwise it is all about whether one expects Black C3 to be reasonable later.
User avatar
ez4u
Oza
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
Rank: Jp 6 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: ez4u
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 2351 times
Been thanked: 1332 times

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by ez4u »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , a . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . 3 . . X . O . 4 b . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

This is a relatively little-used joseki that dates back to the 50's at least. Black generally wants to pincer from a Black position in the lower right, as in the case cited. Most often the pincer used has been :b4: but "a" and "b" have also been played (according to GoGoD). Go Seigen's comment (in Bill's post referenced above) that an immediate "c" is important has not been embraced by the rest of the pro's, although it has been played a few times. The game cited continued as below. It is Game 1 from the 25th KBS Cup Final, played 2006-10-23.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 3 . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . 2 . . 7 . . . . 8 . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . 6 . . , . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by Bill Spight »

ez4u wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . d . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , a . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . 3 . . X . O . 4 b . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

This is a relatively little-used joseki that dates back to the 50's at least. Black generally wants to pincer from a Black position in the lower right, as in the case cited. Most often the pincer used has been :b4: but "a" and "b" have also been played (according to GoGoD). Go Seigen's comment (in Bill's post referenced above) that an immediate "c" is important has not been embraced by the rest of the pro's, although it has been played a few times. The game cited continued as below. It is Game 1 from the 25th KBS Cup Final, played 2006-10-23.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . d . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 3 . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . 2 . . 7 . . . . 8 . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . 6 . . , . . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . O . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


About Go Seigen's comment:

I think that the existence of a White stone on the left side star point ("d") is what makes the second jump better than the pincer. It is that stone that makes :w4: in the second diagram a strong attack. Without it, :b5: is good. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
judicata
Lives in sente
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
Rank: KGS 1k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: judicata
Location: New York, NY
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 150 times

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by judicata »

hyperpape wrote:Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4621&p=77638&hilit=sanrensei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).


Very interesting - I had missed that. :)

Thanks for the comments. It amazes me how a widely rejected move can become accepted (and perhaps rejected again later). This one seems particularly interesting, since this is a "typical mistake" 10 kyus are taught to avoid.
Mef
Lives in sente
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:34 am
Rank: KGS [-]
GD Posts: 428
Location: Central Coast
Has thanked: 201 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?

Post by Mef »

judicata wrote:
hyperpape wrote:Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4621&p=77638&hilit=sanrensei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).


Very interesting - I had missed that. :)

Thanks for the comments. It amazes me how a widely rejected move can become accepted (and perhaps rejected again later). This one seems particularly interesting, since this is a "typical mistake" 10 kyus are taught to avoid.



I think this is one of those cases (much like the kick in response to a low approach), which you first want to make the move, you want to do so for the wrong reasons. Later you find out sometimes there are reasons it might be good...
Post Reply