XKCD

For discussing go rule sets and rule theory
Post Reply
User avatar
oren
Oza
Posts: 2777
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
Location: Seattle, WA
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 549 times

XKCD

Post by oren »

This seemed appropriate to share even if it is about chess. :)

http://xkcd.com/1112/
User avatar
shapenaji
Lives in sente
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:58 pm
Rank: EGF 4d
GD Posts: 952
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 422 times

Re: XKCD

Post by shapenaji »

Gah! Beat me to it!

The alt-text is pretty awesome... and quite relevant.
Tactics yes, Tact no...
User avatar
Bonobo
Oza
Posts: 2224
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:39 pm
Rank: OGS 13k
GD Posts: 0
OGS: trohde
Universal go server handle: trohde
Location: Lüneburg Heath, North Germany
Has thanked: 8262 times
Been thanked: 924 times
Contact:

Re: XKCD

Post by Bonobo »

shapenaji wrote:[..]

The alt-text is pretty awesome... and quite relevant.
Red Knight, eh? :twisted:
“The only difference between me and a madman is that I’m not mad.” — Salvador Dali
User avatar
Redbeard
Lives with ko
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:56 am
Rank: AGA 12k
GD Posts: 292
KGS: RedBeard
DGS: Akahige
Location: Seattle
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 123 times
Contact:

Re: XKCD

Post by Redbeard »

Yep, beat to it as well :). This is exactly what I think when I see someone creating a Go variant. If you think Go needs radical improvement (hexagonal grids, etc), you obviously don't know much about Go.
speedchase
Lives in sente
Posts: 800
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:36 pm
Rank: AGA 2kyu
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: speedchase
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 122 times

Re: XKCD

Post by speedchase »

reminds me of the game bile thread
User avatar
oren
Oza
Posts: 2777
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
Location: Seattle, WA
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: XKCD

Post by oren »

The alt-text for those who don't visit much is something you can see by hovering over the image.

"I've developed a more logical set of rules but the people on the chess community have a bunch of stupid emotional biases and won't reply to my posts."
User avatar
Charlie
Lives in gote
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:19 am
Rank: EGF 4 kyu
GD Posts: 0
Location: Deutschland
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: XKCD

Post by Charlie »

Empty triangles totally need a buff.
Gerlige
Beginner
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:55 am
Rank: EGF 12 kyu
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: XKCD

Post by Gerlige »

Recently I heard one of czech players talking about go in radio. He said something like: "When you first play go you feel like a genius, next you feel like a total idiot and in the end you start like it."
User avatar
Annihilist
Lives with ko
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:47 am
Rank: KGS 10 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Annihilist
IGS: Annihilist
DGS: Ubermensch
Kaya handle: Annihilist
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: XKCD

Post by Annihilist »

Falcord
Dies in gote
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:12 am
Rank: KGS 5 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Neuron
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: XKCD

Post by Falcord »

Redbeard wrote:Yep, beat to it as well :). This is exactly what I think when I see someone creating a Go variant. If you think Go needs radical improvement (hexagonal grids, etc), you obviously don't know much about Go.



Your approach is a bit too radical though. There is nothing wrong with variants, as long as they're properly understood. For me, variants are fun ways to pass time when you want to play Go but are momentarily tired of the normal stuff.

I love one-colour go and lottery go and I respect whoever invented it.

What I would raise my eyebrow at is someone inventing a variation to improve go, specially if the arguments involve obvious lack of understanding of Go itself.

That reminds me... When I started playing, my initial impression was that the game wouldn't be too varied, considering there was only one type of board and piece, and I thought it would be cool to play in differently shaped boards (cross shaped, hole in the middle, etc). I didn't tell anyone because I suspected it came from my lack of understanding of the game, and experience confirmed that. However, I have recently played a game in a cross-shaped board and had a lot of fun with it! It adds nothing of value to the game of Go as a whole, but it is fun =).

(By the way, convex-corner joseki are a lot of fun).
Post Reply