Status question : is this a bent four in the corner?

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Status question : is this a bent four in the corner?

Post by Bill Spight »

Magicwand wrote:Robert. Are you saying that white Ko stone is dead by rule? Even if their aren't any dame?
Under the Japanese '89 rules the White ko stone is dead because Black can take and win the ko without giving rise to another uncapturable White stone. It is not removed because it is not within Black's territory.

The Japanese '89 rules are strange. ;)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
RobertJasiek
Judan
Posts: 6273
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
Been thanked: 797 times
Contact:

Re: Status question : is this a bent four in the corner?

Post by RobertJasiek »

Magicwand wrote: Are you saying that white Ko stone is dead by rule? Even if their aren't any dame?
After your edit, replacing Korean by Ko, let me answer also your now new question:

The ko stone is dead as a consequence of the rules' definitions and their application to that stone (as explained earlier). Dame are, according to the rules, identified after life and death have already been identified. If you have too much time, see also:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7Ewjh/go/rules/Japanese.html
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/j1989c.html
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/j2003.html
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/j2003inf.html
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/j2003com.html
mitsun
Lives in gote
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:10 pm
Rank: AGA 5 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 250 times

Re: Status question : is this a bent four in the corner?

Post by mitsun »

Bill Spight wrote: Under the Japanese '89 rules the White ko stone is dead because Black can take and win the ko without giving rise to another uncapturable White stone. It is not removed because it is not within Black's territory.
The Japanese '89 rules are strange. ;)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$
$$ ------------------
$$ | W X X . O X .
$$ | . O . O O X .
$$ | O O O O X X .
$$ | X X X X X . .
$$ | . . . . . . .[/go]
If W does not intend to start and win the ko, then the marked move seems like a mistake. In an actual game, why would there be any scoring controversy? Instead of passing, B can capture the W stone and then fill the ko, gaining one point for the prisoner, which is removed from the board. Under area scoring rules, I suppose B also gets points for the dame he fills, and he can wait until there are no other dame on the board to get these points while W passes. Unless W has an inexhaustible supply of ko threats, W cannot prevent this outcome. Am I missing something?
Post Reply