I have very little experience with this variation, so I'd like to learn more about it.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wcm1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 9 7 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . 3 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 5 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

This one is no more joseki, not "the usual--gote--variation". It is considered not enough for black.

[edit] viewtopic.php?p=125363#p125363 [/edit]

I disagree that that sequence is no longer joseki. It is a highly situation dependent result. In the diagram you posted, namely an empty board apart from the 4-4 invaded underneath, that result is good for black. The 3-3 invasion is more usually played when black has made a double wing formation from his 4-4 and in that case following that standard sequence can result in one or both of the wing stones becoming inefficient and this transforms the result towards even and then good for white depending on how inefficient black's existing stones become. The example you posted in your lecture series has these wing stones.

I heard this several times from BadukTV. With the night's move instead of hane, black (with 4-4)

1. has better endgame moves later
2. is little bit thicker then the hane variation
3. can consider tenuki

Therefore, the hane variation is no longer called as joseki, or played.

Do you mean the following diagram is not jeseki in general or that it is not joseki only when Black has a double-wing formation?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wcm1
$$ ----------------
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 9 7 8 . .
$$ | . . O X . 0 .
$$ | . . 1 X . . .
$$ | . 3 2 . . . .
$$ | . 5 4 . . . .
$$ | . . 6 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .[/go]

I expect the following. Then, if this happens, I get sente, which I'd be very happy with.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wc
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 4 2 3 . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . 1 5 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .[/go]

However, let's go back and take a look at some of the other good choices EdLee had for his previous move. First, the sente variation:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wc
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 2 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .[/go]

White can tenuki with but has to content himself with the possibility of Black playing this follow-up:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bcm4
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . X O 2 . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . .
$$ | . 3 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .[/go]

White takes sente again, but the lone White stone on the left gets isolated, Black takes a fair bit of territory, and Black threatens to invade the center (unless White blocks, but then Black takes sente).

Second, since White has a stone at J7--which functions as a ladder breaker--White can consider this variation:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wc
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . 3 X O . . . . .
$$ | . 2 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . W[/go]

Because of the ladder-breaker, Black cannot go for the following variation:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bcm4
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 4 3 5 6 . . . .
$$ | . 2 X O . . . . .
$$ | . O X O . . . . .
$$ | . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . 1 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . W[/go]

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bcm10
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . O X X O . . . .
$$ | . O X O 3 . . . .
$$ | . O X O 4 8 . . .
$$ | . X O 1 7 . . . .
$$ | . X 2 6 9 . . . .
$$ | . . 5 0 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . W[/go]

This ladder does not work for Black, so his position collapses.

Therefore, Black would have to choose between the following two options. First, he could live small but get sente:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bcm4
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . a . . . . .
$$ | . 1 X O . . . . .
$$ | 3 O X O . . . . .
$$ | . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . 2 4 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]

Later, White has a big endgame move at "a" which threatens a big ko in the corner.

Second, Black could choose to get more territory but at the cost of taking gote (although here, too, Black would be threatening to invade the center):

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bcm4
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 2 1 4 . . . .
$$ | . 3 X O . . . . .
$$ | . O X O . . . . .
$$ | . X O 6 . . . . .
$$ | . . 5 . . . . . .
$$ | . 7 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]

Another possibility which White could have considered is hane from the other side:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wc
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 2 1 3 . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . .
$$ | . . . 5 . . . .
$$ | . . 4 b . . . .
$$ | . a . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O , . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . .[/go]

Black can next choose between "a" and "b." Also, White might tenuki instead of playing .

Overall, it seems to me that all of these choices are okay for Black. Let's see how the game proceeds, and then we'll be able to decide if any of the above variations would have been better or worse than the game.

In preparation I was thinking of the hane :

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$W
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O . X O O O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O X X X O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]

I believe White should next protect one of the cutting points in the top-left corner. After this, I'll carefully review the situation on the board to verify that I am actually ahead, like I think I am. If my current evaluation of the position holds, I intend to play this:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bc
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . 2 . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O O . . . . . . 1 . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O . X O O O . O . . . |
$$ | . . 3 . . . . . . . O X X X O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]

However, if it turns out my earlier assessment of the position was wrong, I will invade:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bc
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . 1 . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O O . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O . X O O O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O X X X O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]

I think about just connecting at :

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$W
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O 1 . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O . X O O O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O X X X O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]

This local shape is apparently quite rare in pro games -- only 2 out of a search of 50,744 games,
and in both cases, the pro move was connect at , not the tiger's mouth in the game.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$W
$$ -------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X O a . . .
$$ | . . X O . b . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . c X O . . . . .
$$ | . . O 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]

However, I don't understand . Therefore, .

A few things obvious about the solid connect:
- can clamp (a);
- can peep (b);
- hane (c) + connect is sente.

allows you to safely block at which is a huge difference (about 10 points), basics Your move is a bit stronger on the top side, but the left side loss is much bigger and a big failure to punish black's order mistake.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$W
$$ -------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . 2 O 1 . . . . .
$$ | . 3 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]

Black should have hane'd on the left before on top, in which case the below probably happens. It might revert to this end result, but white lost a chance to improve on it.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bm47
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 7 5 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . 8 . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . 3 2 . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O . X O O O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O X X X O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X X . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]

Uberdude, thanks.

I expected EdLee to solidly protect the other cut. In fact, I believe that playing that way would have been better. I think EdLee worried that I would be able to reduce his territory on top in sente like so:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Bc
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . 5 1 3 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O 2 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . a O W . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |[/go]

However, "a" would no longer be sente for Black plus White would be able to reduce Black's corner in sente, gaining territory for himself on the left side:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wcm8
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 4 X X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | a . X O . . . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . 2 X O . . . . . , . O . O . O X . . |
$$ | . 1 X O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . 3 O O . . . . . . . . X . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |[/go]

Black has to play else "a" leads to a ko in the corner. Thus, White's loss on top in sente would be offset by Black's loss in the corner in sente. However, compared to the game, the above diagram would let White have much more territory on the left.

Anyhow, I think I was ahead even before White's last move. Therefore, I think that now I am definitely leading in the game. However, I need to be careful not to let White get too much territory in the center.

One feeling is the double hane.

Generally not joseki anymore.

With the night's move instead of hane, black (with 4-4)

1. has better endgame moves later
2. is little bit thicker then the hane variation
3. can consider tenuki

The hane variation still gets played, though, doesn't it? For example, Lee Sedol (as White) played it (and won) against Cho U in the 1st Round of the 13th LG Cup (2008):

Click Here To Show Diagram Code

[go]$$Wcm34
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . X . O . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . , . O . O . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . W . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . O O X . |
$$ | . . X . . O . . W . . . O O O X X X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Was the hane variation a good choice in this case because of how far the marked White stones are?

3-3 invasion is rare when the extention from 4-4 is that far away. Well, since it's happened, and white can't expect something lot from extra thickness or tenukiing. I think Lee didn't want to give Cho an extra point from the night's move variation. Still, hane variation is no more played in usual cases, and joseki evaluation are done locally not considering the whole board position, which means something non-joseki can always be played in special situations.