thirdfogie wrote:
Thanks for all the replies.
The thing is, I have to work within
my cognitive limits, and not those of Bill or Uberdude
An example: in a comment on my previous game, Bill criticised White for an "I'll go my way, you go your way"
approach, but in the short variation shown below he recommends doing something which feels like that.
Bill Spight wrote:
Here is what I would be thinking about.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm24
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X . . . . . . . X . O . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . X . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Y . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . O . . . 1 . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
The last big place.

Besides, now I am not worried about making Black thick on the right side.
From which the only conclusion is that Go is too hard for me, though that doesn't mean I'll stop playing.
Your mirror projection (not shown here) is interesting.

Go is too hard for me, too.

If you are unfamiliar with the standard sequences Uberdude showed, they are something it helps to file away in memory.

It also helps to be aware of the value of taking the last big place in the opening.

Here is another standard idea that it helps to know.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm24
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X . . . . . . . X . O . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . X . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 W B . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . O . . . 1 . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Suppose that after

Black protects with

(your way, my way?). How do we assess the

-

exchange? Favorable for White. Why? Because if play had started as

-

, if then

Black would not reply with

.

Back to the my way, your way question. Like a number of players, I started out trying to kill everything, but eventually ended up with a placid looking style. I say placid looking because I think about threats.

A couple of comments on the game so far:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm18
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . X . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . O . . . . . O 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

plainly takes aim at invading on the right side. To invade and then continue is consistent. To invade and then extend from the corner is, as well. Which to choose is a judgement call. To develop your judgment, continuing is probably better.

The possibilities are vast, and you need to explore them.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm18
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . B . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . W . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Let's assess this position. The

stone is perhaps a bit passive. Also, the

stone is too close to the secure Black group in the top left corner. And the Black wedge on the right side is hardly dynamic. (One might think that Black has a passive style. It turns out that he plays fairly solidly early on, and then plays aggressively. Not a bad style, in itself. But it looks like he is frittering away the komi.) By contrast, the

stone is nicely placed. White is starting to pull ahead.
What about the future? I think that the

stone and the

stone are the key. Black can rehabilitate the

stone by approaching the top right corner from the top side. And White can make an ideal "enclosure" on the bottom side facing the

stone.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm18 Ideal
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . B . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . W . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
This is the ideal development for White.

makes the enclosure facing the

stone, and then after

,

stifles the development of the

stone. Sweet!
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm18 Black counters
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . B . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , Y . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . W . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

rehabilitates the

stone at the expense of the

wedge. However, the wedge has prevented an ideal formation on the right side by White.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm18
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . B . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . W . . . 3 . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

takes the profit on the top, but allows

.
Frankly, I go for the ideal development in the first diagram. For one thing, the second diagram does not look that good for Black. For another, if Black were capable of playing as in the second diagram, he would not have gotten into this position in the first place.
