It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 8:27 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #61 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:05 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 248
Liked others: 23
Was liked: 148
Rank: DGS 2 kyu
Universal go server handle: Polama
Boidhre wrote:
He wasn't a professional mathematician though and knew when to bring one in to help him. I think people confuse this with him not being capable of doing the maths that got people to help him with, this wasn't the case it was just to be an expert in that area of mathematics he couldn't equally be an expert in theoretical physics due to there only being so many hours in a day.


My understanding is that as a young man he felt he could solve physical problems conceptually (special relativity), but reached an impasse he ended up needing help with (the complex mathematics of general relativity), and become a much more studious mathematician afterwards in his work towards a Unified Theory, having seen that these levels of problems did seem to require a deeper mathematical approach. He was certainly a competent mathematician at a minimum.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #62 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:13 am 
Oza

Posts: 2356
Location: Ireland
Liked others: 662
Was liked: 442
Universal go server handle: Boidhre
Polama wrote:
Boidhre wrote:
He wasn't a professional mathematician though and knew when to bring one in to help him. I think people confuse this with him not being capable of doing the maths that got people to help him with, this wasn't the case it was just to be an expert in that area of mathematics he couldn't equally be an expert in theoretical physics due to there only being so many hours in a day.


My understanding is that as a young man he felt he could solve physical problems conceptually (special relativity), but reached an impasse he ended up needing help with (the complex mathematics of general relativity), and become a much more studious mathematician afterwards in his work towards a Unified Theory, having seen that these levels of problems did seem to require a deeper mathematical approach. He was certainly a competent mathematician at a minimum.


I wasn't suggesting otherwise. What I've heard about him was that he could have easily become a professional mathematician, he just was more drawn to theoretical physics. It wasn't lack of ability but simple lack of expertise and the fastest way to remedy this kind of thing if you've got a good aptitude for mathematics is to bring in a mathematician familiar with the area to work with on certain sections.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #63 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:23 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1639
Location: Ponte Vedra
Liked others: 642
Was liked: 490
Universal go server handle: Bantari
I think you people are mixing three different things in here:

1. It is obvious that if you aim at the very top the starting age does matter. All things being equal (dedication, effort, talent, teacher, etc) the extra 10 or so years of head start can have a tremendous influence. Thus - very few, if any, of the toppest pros started learning late.

2. For somebody wanting to just reach a low-level pro, I think it is possible to start late, but you have to work really hard. Not sure if there are examples of that out there, but I would not be surprised if there were. What age did Catalin start, for example? Or Alex? And can all his years playing in Europe as an ama be called 'starting'?

3. In our case of bumbling-along amateurs trying to get an extra rank on KGS - age is much less important, and starting age even less so. Why? Because the other factors (dedication, effort, talent, teacher, etc) are a much more limiting factor to our development.

As I said before - age limits two things:
- speed of learning and
- maximum potential

Since we never reach our maximum potential by far, the fact that it is lower does not matter all that much. The lower speed of learning means that you have to work that much harder. When you reach a level where you have to work that hard just to stay there, you start to deteriorate with age unless you put more and more effort. And even then it will catch up with you in time.

Just my 2c.

PS>
And what is this talk about Einstein? He was a Go pro too?!? ;)

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #64 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:33 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2011
Location: Groningen, NL
Liked others: 202
Was liked: 1087
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Polama wrote:
wineandgolover wrote:
We all know the pictures of old Einstein. But E=Mc^2 was derived when he was 26. There are many similar examples.


And of course, Hendrik Lorentz's work was hugely influential to Einstein's development of relativity (The changes in size we perceive in a very fast moving object are described as Lorentz contractions because he formalized that before Einstein.) From Wikipedia, it appears he first published on 'local time' at age 39, published the lorentz transformations at 52, and reformulated general relativity in a coordinate free way at 63. There are many similar examples of great contributions at young ages, but there are also many examples of great contributions later in life.


In the context of the discussion, this is rather irrelevant. The issue is not age at which things were achieved, but starting age. In go, there are similar examples. E.g. both Cho Hun Hyun and Cho Chikun won the Samsung Cup in their late forties. Fujisawa Hideyuki even won the Oza several times in his late sixties. But all of these players started young.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #65 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:35 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2011
Location: Groningen, NL
Liked others: 202
Was liked: 1087
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Bantari wrote:
What age did Catalin start, for example?
16.
Quote:
Or Alex?
6.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #66 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:43 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 460
Liked others: 149
Was liked: 101
Rank: 3 kyu
Universal go server handle: billywoods
HermanHiddema wrote:
I still wonder why so many people in this thread seem to think this is true. An unwillingness to accept that they have limitations?

You're surely not ascribing hailthorn's being stuck at 6k to early-twenties dementia? Getting stuck at 4-5d, or if he was in his seventies, yes, maybe. But what I said was simply that I was limited by many other factors far more than my age. My age isn't what's holding me back from getting stronger right now - what's holding me back is that I play a casual game maybe once a fortnight, and instead sit here drinking green tea and posting on L19, working, in the pub, or spending my time on some other hobby or oversleeping.

HermanHiddema wrote:
The truth of the matter is that there are no examples of people making professional when starting in their twenties, no matter how much time they put in it.

Of course there are no examples of people who start in their 20s and make it. There are no examples of people who start in their 20s and then put in the requisite tens of thousands of hours with regular professional tuition studying like their future depended on it. 0 out of 0 is not an interesting statistic. That's my point: you can't statistically isolate the age factor. It's dwarfed by several other factors, like lack of time and interest and dedication.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #67 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:44 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1639
Location: Ponte Vedra
Liked others: 642
Was liked: 490
Universal go server handle: Bantari
HermanHiddema wrote:
Bantari wrote:
What age did Catalin start, for example?
16.
Quote:
Or Alex?
6.


Start at what? Pro training? Or playing along with Go stones?

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #68 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:45 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2011
Location: Groningen, NL
Liked others: 202
Was liked: 1087
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Bantari wrote:
HermanHiddema wrote:
Bantari wrote:
What age did Catalin start, for example?
16.
Quote:
Or Alex?
6.


Start at what? Pro training? Or playing along with Go stones?


Playing.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #69 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:52 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1639
Location: Ponte Vedra
Liked others: 642
Was liked: 490
Universal go server handle: Bantari
HermanHiddema wrote:
Bantari wrote:

Start at what? Pro training? Or playing along with Go stones?


Playing.


Well, that means nothing much then, unless there is more. Playing and seriously training towards prohood might be two different things. I started at 14 or so (so before Catalin) and look at us now... I think its the time you start seriously training, like with teacher and stuff, that should matter here.

I think for most top pros we are not really interested in when they learned the rules of Go but when they started receiving proper training.

Same goes for violinists, if this is even related. The fact that you pick up a violin and start making noise at 6, but do not get a teacher until you are 27 - does not mean the same as training properly with a good teacher many hours a day since you were 6.

So... do you know when Catalin and Alex actually started proper training, whatever this means?

_________________
- Bantari
______________________________________________
WARNING: This post might contain Opinions!!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #70 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 11:01 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2659
Liked others: 310
Was liked: 631
Rank: kgs 6k
wineandgolover wrote:
G. H. Hardy, wrote in his 1940 memoir, A Mathematician’s Apology, “No mathematician should ever allow himself to forget that mathematics, more than any other art or science, is a young man’s game.”

We all know the pictures of old Einstein. But E=Mc^2 was derived when he was 26. There are many similar examples.

Do mathematicians gets stupid once they hit their 30's? No. But their most insightful, innovative days are behind them.

There is no reason to believe go is any different. And, all the real-world evidence says it isn't. Strong pros may stay strong into their 30's and well beyond, but they don't become strong in their 30's.

This is a bad week to be chucking around tired cliches like this, since Zhang Yitang just made waves for making progress on the twin primes conjecture. He must be at least 50, right?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #71 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 11:15 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 248
Liked others: 23
Was liked: 148
Rank: DGS 2 kyu
Universal go server handle: Polama
HermanHiddema wrote:
In the context of the discussion, this is rather irrelevant. The issue is not age at which things were achieved, but starting age.


I chose Lorentz because of his connection to Einstein's work, but a quick search pulls up Alexandre Vandermonde as a mathematician who did important work and apparently started studying math at 35.

Bantari wrote:
As I said before - age limits two things:
- speed of learning and
- maximum potential



I learned Chess in those hazy years before you can reliably pick out memories, probably 4. I played a reasonable amount and cared about improving to defeat my mother. I learned Go at the age of 25. A year and a half later I'm a better Go player than I am a chess player.

I met a very young mid-dan player once. But his father was a high dan amateur Korean player. How many of us taught the game by an expert and play exclusively with experts from our start?

Billywoods wrote:
Of course there are no examples of people who start in their 20s and make it. There are no examples of people who start in their 20s and then put in the requisite tens of thousands of hours with regular professional tuition studying like their future depended on it. 0 out of 0 is not an interesting statistic. That's my point: you can't statistically isolate the age factor. It's dwarfed by several other factors, like lack of time and interest and dedication.


That's my point as well. We have no theory of the brain sufficient to say "yes, you need to start as a young child to really excel". We've got no way to control people's lives enough to test this idea. We've got no good statistical way of approaching the question, because the confounding factors are huge. An 8 year old dedicating 10 years to becoming a go professional would fail in time to go to college with his peers. A 20 year old would be 30 with no degree, career experience or savings. The opportunity costs are so drastically different as to be sufficient to explain the difference on their own.

It could very well be true. My skepticism arises though, because 1) this is the sort of idea people love to believe (should I put long, hard hours into mastering the piano? Oh, I'm too old to be the best anyways, I'll just have fun.) 2) this is the sort of idea people love to tell each other (You're too old to be the a great piano player instead of 'you're just not that good at it') 3) This is the sort of idea that reinforces itself. If people believe only children can be great at Go, the great teachers aren't going to want to help the 15 year olds starting out. If you're told you can't do something enough, it becomes very hard to actually accomplish it.


This post by Polama was liked by 3 people: Bantari, billywoods, Splatted
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #72 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:55 pm 
Tengen

Posts: 4382
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Liked others: 499
Was liked: 733
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
http://senseis.xmp.net/?CatalinTaranu -- there are a couple of players who started in their late teens and made mid-range professional. I know of no 9 dan who started that late.

I think Catalin was rather obsessive soon after he started, and he made quick progress.

_________________
Occupy Babel!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #73 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:04 pm 
Judan

Posts: 6727
Location: Cambridge, UK
Liked others: 436
Was liked: 3720
Rank: UK 4 dan
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
There's also Kim Sung Rae who, unusually for a native Korean, became pro in his 30s, though he had played as an amateur on-and-off since childhood.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #74 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:38 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 197
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 81
Rank: weak
KGS: often
Liang Wei Tang 9d once told me that being a competitive professional is better for a young person not because of "go strength", but the stamina to play many matches in one day (or days) for tournaments. He cited that as the main reason for older pros to bow out and start teaching unless they were at the very top.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #75 Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 7:34 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 370
Liked others: 91
Was liked: 254
Rank: Weak
hyperpape wrote:
http://senseis.xmp.net/?CatalinTaranu -- there are a couple of players who started in their late teens and made mid-range professional. I know of no 9 dan who started that late.

I think Catalin was rather obsessive soon after he started, and he made quick progress.

Of the world title winners, Seo Bongsoo probably started the latest (~age 13). Lee Changho/Lee Sedol/Cho Hunhyun were already pros by the age that Seo started learning go. He had other problems, too: No money, no teacher, no books. It is said that he first got his hands on a copy Xuanxuan Qijing only after turning pro and remarked "What a wonderful book!" He didn't even have access to the classics. Then again, I get the feeling that he was a genius...although the prevailing narrative is that he was not.

I don't know of "normal" people who learned go later than that and won titles.

What about Sakai Hideyuki? He was a doctor (completed medical school and all) before turning pro although he was Fujisawa Shuko's student long before that. He may have started early for all I know, but he must have taken a huge break from go while he was in med school and while he was working.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #76 Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:16 am 
Beginner

Posts: 17
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 1
KGS: petri
Polama wrote:
That's my point as well. We have no theory of the brain sufficient to say "yes, you need to start as a young child to really excel". We've got no way to control people's lives enough to test this idea. We've got no good statistical way of approaching the question, because the confounding factors are huge. An 8 year old dedicating 10 years to becoming a go professional would fail in time to go to college with his peers. A 20 year old would be 30 with no degree, career experience or savings. The opportunity costs are so drastically different as to be sufficient to explain the difference on their own.


There is evidence on age affecting learning abilities. Please have a look stuff call myelin which is needed in learning skills. Age affects in two ways:
- amount of myelin creation is age dependent. At the age 50 one strat loseit about same rate as one gains it. So you need train stuff just not to lose skills.
- learning only myelinizes new tracks. It does not remove old erroneous ones ==> re-learning something is hard as you don really forget the old stuff, but you just have to learn new one better than the old. Older you get more stuff you have in your head already. Also if one plays around for a year before serious study that can also harm learning.

Also ar soft limits as discussed above. 23 year old is far less likely to find time/motivation needed to go around 1p strengt. I do doubt that EGF 6 dan is really within reach. It just might but I don't think so

Nature never heard about equality of all men ;)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #77 Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:46 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2011
Location: Groningen, NL
Liked others: 202
Was liked: 1087
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
lemmata wrote:
What about Sakai Hideyuki? He was a doctor (completed medical school and all) before turning pro although he was Fujisawa Shuko's student long before that. He may have started early for all I know, but he must have taken a huge break from go while he was in med school and while he was working.


If anything, the fact that a player who started young can spend the huge amounts of time necessary to get a medical degree and still become pro after that would support the notion that starting young is very important.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #78 Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 5:48 am 
Gosei

Posts: 1628
Liked others: 546
Was liked: 450
Rank: senior player
GD Posts: 1000
HermanHiddema wrote:
lemmata wrote:
What about Sakai Hideyuki? He was a doctor (completed medical school and all) before turning pro although he was Fujisawa Shuko's student long before that. He may have started early for all I know, but he must have taken a huge break from go while he was in med school and while he was working.


If anything, the fact that a player who started young can spend the huge amounts of time necessary to get a medical degree and still become pro after that would support the notion that starting young is very important.


Sakai was professional strength before he finished medical training. He won several amateur national championships in Japan and was considered the strongest amateur in Japan for a period. In 2000 he won the world amateur championship . He became an official pro by defeating pros in even test games, winning two against a pro 5-D and one against a pro 7-D, and entered the pro ranks as a pro 5-D.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #79 Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 6:25 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2011
Location: Groningen, NL
Liked others: 202
Was liked: 1087
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
gowan wrote:
Sakai was professional strength before he finished medical training. He won several amateur national championships in Japan and was considered the strongest amateur in Japan for a period. In 2000 he won the world amateur championship . He became an official pro by defeating pros in even test games, winning two against a pro 5-D and one against a pro 7-D, and entered the pro ranks as a pro 5-D.
Yes, I know. What I am addressing is the argument that kids just have loads of time, and that that is the real reason they get as far as they do. IMO, you don't get a medical degree without spending quite some time on it. Not just in college, but also in school. There is no way Sakai Hideyuki just spent all his time on go.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Age & Improvement
Post #80 Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 7:02 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 452
Liked others: 74
Was liked: 100
Rank: 4 Dan European
When I did my PhD, Alex Abercrombie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Abercrombie) was a couple of years' ahead of me. He taught himself maths, and applied to do an undergraduate degree. He had taught hmiself so much maths that he was directly accepted onto a PhD bypassing undergraduate courses. He did pioneering research in his PhD, and I believe he published 17 articles in 3 years.

He got his doctorate in 1996 at the age of 47, taking 3 years. Prior to studying maths, he was a concert pianist. He is now a concert pianist again.


This post by drmwc was liked by 2 people: gowan, Splatted
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group