The Simpsons and Math
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
The Simpsons and Math
The Simpsons and Their Mathematical Secrets (Oct 29, 2013), by Simon Singh, author of Fermat's Enigma.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
Boidhre
- Oza
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Boidhre
- Location: Ireland
- Has thanked: 661 times
- Been thanked: 442 times
Re: The Simpsons and Math
The author did a video for a (good) YouTube channel called Numberphile:
He's a good storyteller in person too it seems. 
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
- Codexus
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:24 am
- Rank: DGS 6k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Codexus
- DGS: Codexus
- Location: Geneva, Switzerland
- Has thanked: 66 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
Re: The Simpsons and Math
Simon Singh is great popular science writer. He really makes those books impossible to put down.
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
Re: The Simpsons and Math
I was a bit disappointed about Fermat's Last Theorem: the core, the description of Wiles' presentation of the alleged proof at university, should have been much more detailed. His Code Book is better. Anyway, both books are well worth reading.
-
Boidhre
- Oza
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Boidhre
- Location: Ireland
- Has thanked: 661 times
- Been thanked: 442 times
Re: The Simpsons and Math
A small language point Robert, I hope you don't mind.RobertJasiek wrote:I was a bit disappointed about Fermat's Last Theorem: the core, the description of Wiles' presentation of the alleged proof at university, should have been much more detailed. His Code Book is better. Anyway, both books are well worth reading.
Attempted is a better word than alleged there. Alleged has a lot of negative connotations, mainly around trying to deliberately mislead others when used outside of a legal context. If someone wanted to nitpick your statement here (even though I imagine that you're saying nothing controversial at all) they could here.