Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
Post Reply
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by oca »

I used to play a game against a 4 kyu with 9 handicap stones.
He kindly told me to place the stones where I wanted on the goban.

I don't remember the exact position where I placed the hanidcap stones, but I remember that was something quite "classic", with some hoshi, komoku, shimari, extensions and so on...
after a bit more thougth, I wonder what would a game look like if the handicap stones where placed like that :
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . X , X . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]

ok it's 10 stones not 9... but that seems really strong as a starting point...

if only 9 stones :
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . X , a . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . b . X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . c . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


Then as white... would you place your first move at "a" or would you just take a corner ?
if white "a" I even don't know what I would replay may just "b" or maybe a corner I think... or maybe "c"

Anyone to try that on a malkovitch game :rambo: :blackeye: :D

[edit]corrected some typo[/edit]

[EDIT SUMMARY ZONE]
Illluck kindly accepted to play some variations with me, here are the summary of those games :

Try #1 - The Island, 10 stones handicap, OGS: http://online-go.com/game/579811
235 moves (255 moves - 20 initials moves to build the initial position)
Corrected total to match 0.5 komi if I was playing black :
B(illluck)+56.5 (49.5 + 6.5 + 0.5)

+--------------------------------------+
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . O O O . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . O . O . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . O . O . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . O O O . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
+--------------------------------------+


The game


Try #2 - Borders & Tengen, 9 stones hanicap, OGS: http://online-go.com/game/586484
212 moves (229 moves - 17 initials moves)
Corrected total to match 0.5 komi :
W(illluck)+32.5 (38.5 - 6)

+--------------------------------------+
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
+--------------------------------------+


The game


Try #3 - Standard 9 stones, OGS: http://online-go.com/game/588995
294 moves
W(illluck)+20.5

+--------------------------------------+
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
+--------------------------------------+


The game

EdLee comments :
viewtopic.php?p=164723#p164723


Try #4 - The Big Square, 9 stones hanicap, OGS : http://online-go.com/game/605761
226 moves (243 moves - 17 initials moves)
Corrected total to match 0.5 komi :
W(illluck)+39.5 (45.5 - 6)


+--------------------------------------+
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . X . . . . X . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . X . . . . X . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
+--------------------------------------+


The game

Homework ;) :
Consider at least three possibilities for each move, and comment them in the malkovitch log.
Consideration should include :
- What do I excpect as response from white.
- I'm a going to be settled
- Is a group in danger
- Does the overall situation needs a tenuki

I will also do my best to keep "broken shape" in mind and really try to avoid them...


[/EDIT]
Attachments
04_big_square.sgf.sgf
(1.8 KiB) Downloaded 674 times
02_borders_and_tengen.sgf
(15.09 KiB) Downloaded 710 times
01_the_island.sgf
(13.51 KiB) Downloaded 706 times
Last edited by oca on Tue May 20, 2014 8:05 am, edited 14 times in total.
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

Hi oca, I think that's another popular discussion.

I wonder if Sensei's already has something about it... :)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . X X X . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
I'm curious: what do people think the above dumpling is worth, approximately,
in terms of the normal star-point handi stones ? It seems less than 9 stones.
(The tengen stone is clearly inefficient. :) )
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by Uberdude »

Which looks better (more efficient):

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . X , X . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


Or:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . X , X . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


Or:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


oca wrote:Then as white... would you place your first move at "a" or would you just take a corner ?
if white "a" I even don't know what I would replay may just "b" or maybe a corner I think... or bay be "c"


White a is nonsense, you think you are taking black's 2nd eye and going to attack that tank with a tennis ball? Both players should play big moves in the corners.
Last edited by Uberdude on Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
illluck
Lives in sente
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
Rank: OGS 2d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by illluck »

What about this 10 stone placement?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . X . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . X X X . X . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . X . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]


If I want to win with 9 stones, probably will go with something like the below:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

illluck wrote:If I want to win with 9 stones, probably will go with something like the below:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Hi illluck, what's your theory that your above placement gives you a better chance against a pro than the normal star-point placement ?
Luckily, this hypothesis is testable! :)
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by oca »

Uberdude wrote:White a is nonsense, you think you are taking black's 2nd eye and going to attack that tank with a tennis ball? Both players should play big moves in the corners.

In the past, I used to destroy very big walls with only a small ball
but...
the game was arkanoid... not go...
arkanoid.png
arkanoid.png (27.58 KiB) Viewed 11255 times
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
illluck
Lives in sente
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
Rank: OGS 2d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re:

Post by illluck »

EdLee wrote:Hi illluck, what's your theory that your above placement gives you a better chance against a pro than the normal star-point placement ?
Luckily, this hypothesis is testable! :)


My idea is that the board here is a bit more settled in most of the area compared to a normal placement where there are more places for white to play and also more chances for interactions between areas. I suspect my placement is less optimal in the sense that perfect play would probably result in a lower winning margin than the traditional placement, but could be easier for black to try to simplify the game. Also, I play sansan regularly in my games so I'm just more familiar with them compared to hoshi or komoku.

Edit: Oh, Ed, didn't see your question about that dumpling. My feeling is around 3 stones as it seems similar to a ponnuki (the proverbial 30 points) but potentially somewhat worse due to its lack of eyeshape.
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

Hi illluck, thanks, actually my question about your hypothesis was semi-rhetorical; sorry. :)

Curious: how much experience have you had with handi games against pros (9 stones or otherwise) ?
Do you happen to know your approximate level relative to pro (how many handi stones from pro) ?
dfunkt
Dies with sente
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 1:17 pm
Rank: 9k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: dfunkt
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by dfunkt »

I played a handicap game once and gave my opponent 2 moves for each of my moves for my first 9 turns. It made an interesting game even though he was much weaker.
illluck
Lives in sente
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
Rank: OGS 2d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by illluck »

I've never actually played a pro. I think the strongest player I played was in viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5848. He is a mid to strong Tygem 9d, and I seem to remember him stating that he's probably about 2-3 stones away from top pros. This would suggest 9 stones to be approximately the handicap where I would have a chance against pros. I think I'm probably around KGS 2-3d nowadays (potentially slightly weaker than when I played that game T.T), which also suggests that 9 stones is probably not too far off against pros.

However, that does not take into account my inability to play handicap games as black (see viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9270). My opponent is about KGS 6d (and I think my previous record against him is 1/0 at even games) and I still lost the game. So I suspect that in actuality my chances against pros will be pretty slim at even 9 stones.
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

dfunkt wrote:gave my opponent 2 moves for each of my moves for my first 9 turns.
You guys were wise; we tried variations where it was two B moves for each W move, forever. That was too much. ( We also very quickly found out that four B moves per W move meant lots of B ponnukis and zero W stones on the board. :) )

Eventually we adjusted to every 4 or 5 B moves, B could go twice in a row -- that was manageable. W had to adopt new strategies, too, it was interesting. For example: life-and-death, ladders, ko, even simple cuts, etc., all change their meanings -- both B and W must read ahead of the up-coming double-B move.
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by oca »

Just tryied against smartgo, what weird game...
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
DrStraw
Oza
Posts: 2180
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 662 times
Contact:

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by DrStraw »

In the original position I think I would just ignore it. Remembering that W is 9 ranks stronger it is safe to assume that he can select joseki in each corner which will give him territory and not risk any ladders. Let B have the outside and the 10 stones will end up useless in the middle of his territory.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).
DrStraw
Oza
Posts: 2180
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 662 times
Contact:

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by DrStraw »

illluck wrote:I've never actually played a pro. I think the strongest player I played was in viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5848. He is a mid to strong Tygem 9d, and I seem to remember him stating that he's probably about 2-3 stones away from top pros. This would suggest 9 stones to be approximately the handicap where I would have a chance against pros. I think I'm probably around KGS 2-3d nowadays (potentially slightly weaker than when I played that game T.T), which also suggests that 9 stones is probably not too far off against pros.



I think you are selling yourself short. It may be tough against a top pro but I think you can probably give a low-level pro a good game on a much lower handicap. I once beat Jimmy Cha on 4 stones and I have a KGS 3d account. I was about the same strength then as now. Of course, he didn't like it and completely wiped me off the board the next time we played, also on 4. I think he was 4 dan pro at the time.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement

Post by oca »

Another try with illluck's proposition


I was a bit less confortable with that one... and don't understand why smartgo let me take is group at the end...
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
Post Reply