What should have i done?
What should have i done?
http://online-go.com/game/586229, i´m the black. I just want tips , like "with you played at some place you have a stroger influence". Could some one do this for me?
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
- oca
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
- Rank: DDK
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: aco
- IGS: oca
- OGS: oca
- Location: Switzerland
- Has thanked: 485 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
Re: What should have i done?
Like EdLee, I don't understand why you resigned...
If I had to continue that game and had to choose my color, I will choose black...
If I had to continue that game and had to choose my color, I will choose black...
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
-
xed_over
- Oza
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:51 am
- Has thanked: 1179 times
- Been thanked: 553 times
Re: What should have i done?
As has been mentioned, you resigned too early. You were building a very strong wall. Looks like you could have easily dominated the game with that.
One thing I like to do in my self-review, is to examine the game backwards. You can already see what happened, so just back up and see if you can find better moves instead. As Ed suggests, those stones at the bottom were dead before you realized. Maybe you could find bigger moves elsewhere instead?
Its difficult to try and figure out what your intentions were in the game. At one point, it looks like you were getting too focused on trying to surround the white group at the bottom -- it was never gonna happen. They have too many liberties. With each turn, he's gaining more and more liberties (as well as cutting off and capturing your few stones), so you're never going to be able to overtake and reduce him to zero liberties for a capture. Keep count of your (and your opponent's) liberties. Realize when you're falling behind in a capturing race, and move on to something bigger.
I don't know why so many beginners try to "capture" by hitting the nose of some small group of stones (your move
). He can squeeze out in multiple directions still and keep your stones cut off and separated from each other. You need to attack from a position of strength, which often means keeping your stones together.
Remember, this is a territory game. The one who controls the most territory wins. And capturing is NOT the most efficient way to gain bigger territory.
Also remember to share. Your opponent is going to get SOME territory. Its ok. Let him get some territory, just let it be smaller than yours -- and so far, that's what happened in your game at the point you resigned. You "surrounded" that white group and forced it to live small by sacrificing your few stones. And built up lots of power across the rest of the board.
Hope some of this helps.
One thing I like to do in my self-review, is to examine the game backwards. You can already see what happened, so just back up and see if you can find better moves instead. As Ed suggests, those stones at the bottom were dead before you realized. Maybe you could find bigger moves elsewhere instead?
Its difficult to try and figure out what your intentions were in the game. At one point, it looks like you were getting too focused on trying to surround the white group at the bottom -- it was never gonna happen. They have too many liberties. With each turn, he's gaining more and more liberties (as well as cutting off and capturing your few stones), so you're never going to be able to overtake and reduce him to zero liberties for a capture. Keep count of your (and your opponent's) liberties. Realize when you're falling behind in a capturing race, and move on to something bigger.
I don't know why so many beginners try to "capture" by hitting the nose of some small group of stones (your move
Remember, this is a territory game. The one who controls the most territory wins. And capturing is NOT the most efficient way to gain bigger territory.
Also remember to share. Your opponent is going to get SOME territory. Its ok. Let him get some territory, just let it be smaller than yours -- and so far, that's what happened in your game at the point you resigned. You "surrounded" that white group and forced it to live small by sacrificing your few stones. And built up lots of power across the rest of the board.
Hope some of this helps.
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: What should have i done?
Because they hope their opponent will not play a move before their next move.xed_over wrote:I don't know why so many beginners try to "capture" by hitting the nose of some small group of stones (your move ).
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
It's very easy to forget what we were like when we were beginners.I don't know why so many beginners try to
Corollary: it's not so easy to remember -- it helps to have lots of experience working with beginners. And consciously try to see and feel from their perspective.
If a pro were to review many of our moves, the same comment may pop up. A lot.Its difficult to try and figure out what your intentions were in the game.
Beginners are exploring, just like we all are. Only their space is slightly different from ours (but not by much!
Like babies learning to crawl, then to walk. Lots of experimentation, lots of falling. That's how we all start.
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: What should have i done?
kaien, I made a short review of the early moves at http://online-go.com/game/review/17351
The most important tip I can give you is pay more attention to whether your stones (and your opponent's) are connected or if they can be cut.
The most important tip I can give you is pay more attention to whether your stones (and your opponent's) are connected or if they can be cut.
- Abyssinica
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:36 am
- Rank: Miserable 4k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: STOP STALKING ME
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
Re: What should have i done?
To be fair it is a tesuji; I would never have considered that move, even as a beginner I guess, in a million years, yet was amazed when I first read it in the James Davis book. Of course it doesn't work here.xed_over wrote:
I don't know why so many beginners try to "capture" by hitting the nose of some small group of stones (your move).
-
xed_over
- Oza
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:51 am
- Has thanked: 1179 times
- Been thanked: 553 times
Re: What should have i done?
yes, I'm fully aware that there is a tesuji that starts like that, but beginners don't know it.Abyssinica wrote:To be fair it is a tesuji; I would never have considered that move, even as a beginner I guess, in a million years, yet was amazed when I first read it in the James Davis book. Of course it doesn't work here.xed_over wrote:
I don't know why so many beginners try to "capture" by hitting the nose of some small group of stones (your move).
and can you elucidate on how this situation is different from the situation where the tesuji works? I can't. Not clearly enough, anyway. I have the same problem with attaching to stones. Its usually just simpler to tell beginners "don't do that", until they are able to learn on their own when they can, and when they can't.
and I'm sure I must have done it when I was first learning, but I don't remember doing it, and more importantly, I don't remember what my reasoning could have possibly been for even attempting that -- else I might be able to better explain why they shouldn't.
- Abyssinica
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:36 am
- Rank: Miserable 4k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: STOP STALKING ME
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
Re: What should have i done?
Black needs more of a wall on the left with enough liberties to net the stones. Say, if black had m4 and l4?xed_over wrote:and can you elucidate on how this situation is different from the situation where the tesuji works?Abyssinica wrote:To be fair it is a tesuji; I would never have considered that move, even as a beginner I guess, in a million years, yet was amazed when I first read it in the James Davis book. Of course it doesn't work here.xed_over wrote:
I don't know why so many beginners try to "capture" by hitting the nose of some small group of stones (your move).
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: What should have i done?
I think that it is a mistake to give beginners such blanket advice. Let's face it, attachment is a frequent tesuji. Some 40% of the tesuji examples in the Segoe-Go Seigen tesuji dictionary are attachments. Why warn people against attachments? Sure, beginners make mistakes, but they make mistakes anyway.xed_over wrote:yes, I'm fully aware that there is a tesuji {nose attachment} that starts like that, but beginners don't know it.
and can you elucidate on how this situation is different from the situation where the tesuji works? I can't. Not clearly enough, anyway. I have the same problem with attaching to stones. Its usually just simpler to tell beginners "don't do that", until they are able to learn on their own when they can, and when they can't.
The advice I give is that it is usually better to attack from a short distance instead of attaching. The reason, as Bruce Wilcox so nicely put it, is that in contact fights both sides normally get stronger. When you are attacking you do not want your opponent's stones to get stronger. When you are defending, you do want your stones to get stronger, so you should often attach. Remember the proverb, Sabaki is attachment.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
xed_over
- Oza
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:51 am
- Has thanked: 1179 times
- Been thanked: 553 times
Re: What should have i done?
and I think its a bigger mistake to overwhelm beginners with too much technical advice.Bill Spight wrote: I think that it is a mistake to give beginners such blanket advice.
maybe we can find a balance
-
illluck
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
- Rank: OGS 2d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: illluck
- Tygem: Trickprey
- OGS: illluck
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Re: What should have i done?
I think Bill's suggestion "The advice I give is that it is usually better to attack from a short distance instead of attaching. The reason, as Bruce Wilcox so nicely put it, is that in contact fights both sides normally get stronger. When you are attacking you do not want your opponent's stones to get stronger. When you are defending, you do want your stones to get stronger, so you should often attach." strikes a pretty decent balance.xed_over wrote:and I think its a bigger mistake to overwhelm beginners with too much technical advice.Bill Spight wrote: I think that it is a mistake to give beginners such blanket advice.
maybe we can find a balance