PeterPeter wrote:
A mistake for white?
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . O 2 3 B . . . B . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Probably, but not always (whereas with high I would say the push is pretty much always bad: I don't recall ever seeing it played professionally). The first thing to say is black's shape here is rather inefficient with both of the marked stones low. Which one got there first? because the 2nd was probably a mistake (if knight's move in corner first then lower side extension is not important place, and if extension first then answering approach with knight's move is a bit lame).
The normal sequence is again the 2nd line hane:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 2 1 X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . 6 W 3 . X . . . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 4 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
or (10 can also be at a, because if black answers at b to keep the pressure on those 2 outside stones then white c is sente which means the corner is already alive without needing to defend at 10, also black 7 could be 8 when black is worried about the cut at d but here the lower side stones means that's not a valid fear).
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | b a O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 3 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | c 2 1 X 9 d . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . 4 W 0 8 X . . . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . 6 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
The idea of the push is that black has a cutting point (unlike before) which is ladder dependent. If white has the ladder he can do this:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 8 O 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | 9 5 7 . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 4 1 X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . 6 W 2 3 X . . . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Now the solid move for black is to defend at
a and white to live at
b. If black plays b to kill the corner white will cut and try to kill one of the surrounding groups before his corner dies. Now in fact here the black stone on the lower side may make this hard, but even if white's corner dies if he can get a good squeeze for outside power it can be ok anyway. The reason white would want to play this push variation rather than the first diagram is:
1: he takes more of the corner from black, so black has less territory and more important eyespace here
2: he gets that wall of 3 on the left side.
This push is an aggressive attacking move. However there's not much of an attack if black already has the lower side extension, but if white had strength around there the push would make sense.
Btw, in this pro game from yesterday at
viewtopic.php?p=174380#p174380 we see white unusually doesn't make the push down when black plays 3-3 on move 74. That's because black would counter with the c4 push herself aiming at that cutting point thanks to the f5 stone and centre thickness. (Also black already extended at c9 so can tenuki after black connects, and there the bulge point is inefficient for black.