Was I correct in thinking this move setup seki?
-
virre
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:22 am
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: virre
- DGS: virre
- OGS: virre
- Location: Solna, Sweden
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Was I correct in thinking this move setup seki?
From a game on OGS. In the end black played A and those was heavly killed
- Abyssinica
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:36 am
- Rank: Miserable 4k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: STOP STALKING ME
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
-
virre
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:22 am
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: virre
- DGS: virre
- OGS: virre
- Location: Solna, Sweden
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Was I correct in thinking this move setup seki?
Yes, I saw that now, why he did not do that and I not play better against it is probably because we both are beginners I guess.Abyssinica wrote:Black should play s5?
(But I really need to stop playing like that)
Org game is here
http://online-go.com/game/1193124
- daal
- Oza
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:30 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 1304 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: Was I correct in thinking this move setup seki?
Actually, this position is not at all like seki. If a position is seki, neither player can put their opponent in atari without putting himself in atari. In the position you show, (if we ignore the fact that b can capture white as Abyssinica pointed out) white can put black in atari at S1 or S2, so if not for S5, black would simply be dead. You can read an explanation about seki here: http://senseis.xmp.net/?Seki
Patience, grasshopper.
-
Mike Novack
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:36 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: Was I correct in thinking this move setup seki?
Leaving aside the specifics of this case, learning about seki you need to learn the difference between temporary seki and real seki.
It is not seki just because the inside situation is seki. Let's suppose for just a moment that the situation in the corner was locally a seki (that would be a different arrangement of stones, but let that pass for a moment. Would this be a seki? No, because the white stones just above could be captured and after that, with outside liberties, black could capture the white stones inside.
Why am I saying this? Precisely because it is one of the things beginners have to learn to look for (when learning about seki). In other words, asking not just whether internally there were seki possibilities but also considering whether the outside groups were in fact all safely alive would have led to seeing the move S5.
It is not seki just because the inside situation is seki. Let's suppose for just a moment that the situation in the corner was locally a seki (that would be a different arrangement of stones, but let that pass for a moment. Would this be a seki? No, because the white stones just above could be captured and after that, with outside liberties, black could capture the white stones inside.
Why am I saying this? Precisely because it is one of the things beginners have to learn to look for (when learning about seki). In other words, asking not just whether internally there were seki possibilities but also considering whether the outside groups were in fact all safely alive would have led to seeing the move S5.
- Abyssinica
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:36 am
- Rank: Miserable 4k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: STOP STALKING ME
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
Re: Was I correct in thinking this move setup seki?
I love when I open up someone else's game, think something could become seki, and when I ask them about it they point out the fact that some stones on the outside were dead that I completely did not notice. 