The nearly minimal problem

General conversations about Go belong here.
fanfan
Dies in gote
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:55 am
Rank: 3d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: fanfan
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

The nearly minimal problem

Post by fanfan »

Hello,

For many (many) years, i ask beginners to solve the following problem, that I call "the nearly minimal problem": on an empty goban, Black plays at the 1-1 point, then White tries to make a living group with a white stone on the 1-1 (the word "with" is important).
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------
$$ | 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .[/go]
Easy?
Simplify!
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

Hi fanfan, Does B resist or pass forever when W moves each time ?
If B passes forever after :b1: :
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B :w10: at :b1:
$$ --------------
$$ | 1 O . O . O .
$$ | O O O O O O .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . .[/go]
fanfan
Dies in gote
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:55 am
Rank: 3d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: fanfan
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by fanfan »

Of course, Black replies and tries to kill White.
Simplify!
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

fanfan wrote:Of course, Black replies and tries to kill White.
Thanks for clarifying. The "of course" part was not obvious, since for raw beginners, we sometimes "pass forever" to teach them some things.

If B resists, it's not obvious to me this can be done, nor does this appear to be a problem for raw beginners.

Just to be very clear, when you say beginners, do you mean they know only the most basic rules ? Do they "know" about ladders ? Do they "know" about real eyes and false eyes ? Please clarify.
fanfan
Dies in gote
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:55 am
Rank: 3d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: fanfan
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by fanfan »

Hello,

I ask beginners to solve this problem just to train them. But you are right : this is a difficult problem.

Here, my aim is to determine who will win the figth since I am not sure myself to be able to solve this problem.
Simplify!
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

fanfan wrote:I am not sure myself to be able to solve this problem.
Hi fanfan, I feel it's important and fair to warn the "beginners" you don't know if this problem has a solution. :)

Also, I don't think this is appropriate for raw beginners. :)
MMaestro
Dies in gote
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:19 am
Rank: AGA 3D
GD Posts: 0
KGS: 2D
Tygem: 6D
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by MMaestro »

When I was running my club before, I used to have a friend who would teach beginners in a similar way, except he would play on the 2-1 point, not the 1-1. I think for the 1-1 point, white can simply play the 2-2 point and keep extending each time black pushes. But for the 2-1 point, the shoulderhit is more difficult because black's pushes actually gain eyespace
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by Bill Spight »

fanfan wrote:Hello,

For many (many) years, i ask beginners to solve the following problem, that I call "the nearly minimal problem": on an empty goban, Black plays at the 1-1 point, then White tries to make a living group with a white stone on the 1-1 (the word "with" is important).
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------
$$ | 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .[/go]
Why?
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
fanfan
Dies in gote
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:55 am
Rank: 3d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: fanfan
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by fanfan »

MMaestro wrote:... for the 1-1 point, white can simply play the 2-2 point and keep extending each time black pushes...
If White plays on the 2-2 point, Black plays at the 3-3 point, and it is not obvious that White can take the 1-1 and play at the 1-1 later without dying. For instance:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------
$$ | 1 6 . . . .
$$ | . 2 5 . . .
$$ | . 4 3 . . .
$$ | . 7 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .[/go]
Last edited by fanfan on Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Simplify!
fanfan
Dies in gote
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:55 am
Rank: 3d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: fanfan
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by fanfan »

Bill Spight wrote:Why?
This is just a problem that could be of some interest.
Simplify!
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by Uberdude »

I could just about understand you posing that problem to teach Batoo, the Korean baduk variant that adds Starcraft-style visuals and bonus points for occupying certain squares, but what's the point for Go? Do you find it engages and encourages beginners, teaching them useful Go skills? Because I'm a 4d so pretty good at Go compared to a beginner but after my initial "WTF?!" struggle with that problem.

I think this is a better minimal problem for beginners:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black to play and capture a stone
$$ ------------
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . .
$$ | . . X O . .
$$ | . . . X . .
$$ | . . . . . .[/go]
fanfan
Dies in gote
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:55 am
Rank: 3d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: fanfan
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by fanfan »

Uberdude wrote:Do you find it engages and encourages beginners...
Forget the word "Beginners". I used the term just to introduce the problem. I agree that it is not the first thing to show to a beginner.
Simplify!
PeterN
Lives with ko
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:44 pm
Rank: KGS 4 Kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: PeterN
Online playing schedule: KGS some weekday evenings GMT/BST
KGS weekends semi-randomly
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by PeterN »

My first instinct on looking at this was to laugh and think it was easy... then I thought about it a bit more and went :scratch:.

I'm suspecting this may be a situation where the only winning move is not to play :lol: (or tenuki at least).

And yes I know that completely avoids the question.

PeterN
User avatar
Charlie
Lives in gote
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:19 am
Rank: EGF 4 kyu
GD Posts: 0
Location: Deutschland
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by Charlie »

Er... I still don't get it. For instance, the problem doesn't say that you have to capture the black stone, only make a living group that happens to have a stone at 1-1. I'm fairly certain white can make life after this :w6: ...
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------
$$ | 1 . . . . .
$$ | . 2 5 . . .
$$ | . 4 3 . . .
$$ | . . 6 . . .
$$ | . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . .[/go]
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: The nearly minimal problem

Post by oca »

that's a fail so far for me :blackeye:
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
Post Reply