Fredrik wrote:If you are ahead by ten points, why enter the insanely complex fight?
Because it's fun
Fredrik wrote:If you are ahead by ten points, why enter the insanely complex fight?
Li Kao wrote:Fredrik wrote:If you are ahead by ten points, why enter the insanely complex fight?
Because it's fun
Aphelion wrote:You don't play Go to have fun, you play Go to win.
Aphelion wrote:You don't play Go to have fun, you play Go to win.
DrStraw wrote:Speak for yourself. I play to have fun.
Helel wrote:Aphelion wrote:
You don't play Go to have fun, you play Go to win.
Go is a really a kind of mental intercourse. There is no defeat as long as it is satisfying for both parties.
DrStraw wrote:Aphelion wrote:You don't play Go to have fun, you play Go to win.
Speak for yourself. I play to have fun. If I win that is a nice bonus. The win at all costs attitude is what is bringing this country to its knees.
Toge wrote:There has to be perception that choices matter and that the player feels he is good at what he's doing.
topazg wrote:Does there? You mean if you don't think you are very skilled at something you could never find it enjoyable? That's sad
Helel wrote:No... not in my experience anyway. Most people are not very skilled at all, but they seem to manage just fine...
Helel wrote:What has that to do with anything? OK, I tend to assume that people are something less than perfect, but how is that connected to your elitist view of joy?
palapiku wrote:...childish innocence represented by Helel...

Aphelion wrote:More seriously though, I would find it impossible to have fun if I know I am clearly playing non-optimally.