Databases again

For discussing go computing, software announcements, etc.
Post Reply
Pippen
Lives in gote
Posts: 677
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:34 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: 2d
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Databases again

Post by Pippen »

Obviously deep learning needs deep databases of good quality games (better than 5dKGS/8dTygem I guess). Anyone a clou where to find those or where those programmers get them? I could need a database with 1.000.000 quality games :).
hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: Databases again

Post by hyperpape »

I was about to say it's not obvious, since Google used one version of the neural net to play games which were then fed back into their system for reinforcement learning.

But if there was an open database of sufficient size, you could avoid the step of recreating games while training your system. Does anyone know how much of the resources that accounts for?
User avatar
djhbrown
Lives in gote
Posts: 392
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 5:00 pm
Rank: NR
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Re: Databases again

Post by djhbrown »

deep learning does not need deep databases because if you already have a deep database you don't need to deep learn
Last edited by djhbrown on Tue May 02, 2017 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pio2001
Lives in gote
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:13 pm
Rank: kgs 5 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Pio2001
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Databases again

Post by Pio2001 »

In the paper published by Deepmind in Nature, they say
We trained the policy network (...) to classify positions according to expert moves played in the KGS data set. This data set contains 29.4 million positions from 160,000 games played by KGS 6 to 9 dan human players; 35.4% of the games are handicap games.
In the press conference after match 5, they said that Demis thought that AlphaGo could learn the game by itself, but they all the same started the deep learning with a database of human games.

I think that it would be interesting to see what fuseki would AlphaGo play if it had not seen any human game at all. But I'm afraid that it would miss some important concepts, like a human repeating the same mistakes against a weak software because the mistakes are never punished.
As they said in the interviews, neural networks have "blind spots". The more they are trained, the smaller the blind spots.
Tryss
Lives in gote
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 1:07 pm
Rank: KGS 2k
GD Posts: 100
KGS: Tryss
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 153 times

Re: Databases again

Post by Tryss »

djhbrown wrote:but since pros are only human (cogito ergo err) they make mistakes, and a database full of mistakes is no use to man or beast.
:roll:

You don't need perfect play for a database to be usefull... I even think that a database of games devoid of of mistakes would be less usefull


By the way, your joseki database is probably full of mistakes (the concept of joseki, is, in the absolute, a mistake. But in practice, at human level, it's verery usefull)
User avatar
djhbrown
Lives in gote
Posts: 392
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 5:00 pm
Rank: NR
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Re: Databases again

Post by djhbrown »

Tryss wrote:the concept of joseki, is, in the absolute, a mistake.
Last edited by djhbrown on Tue May 02, 2017 1:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
DrStraw
Oza
Posts: 2180
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 662 times
Contact:

Re: Databases again

Post by DrStraw »

djhbrown wrote:
Tryss wrote:the concept of joseki, is, in the absolute, a mistake.
oh, really? :) fair play is a mistake, eh? ...
Why do you say that? Fair play is a mistake to any political party in any country in the world. If it weren't they would never get elected.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).
Post Reply