Kirby wrote:In some English go book, I recall the guy saying to compare relative sizes of territory in the middle game rather than getting a precise count. I haven't tried this, but maybe it's simpler?
Attack and Defense.
Kirby wrote:In some English go book, I recall the guy saying to compare relative sizes of territory in the middle game rather than getting a precise count. I haven't tried this, but maybe it's simpler?
jeromie wrote:Kirby wrote:In some English go book, I recall the guy saying to compare relative sizes of territory in the middle game rather than getting a precise count. I haven't tried this, but maybe it's simpler?
Attack and Defense.It works well unless the game is close.
Calvin Clark wrote:Okay, I lost my game this morning. I promised myself that if I did I would play an unusual opening next time. It may not be 4-9 but maybe. I have some ideas.

Calvin Clark wrote:I won my last game, but I can't say it's a masterpiece. It is more like attacking style gone bad and I was forced to kill to win. See the game.
That leaves me at a 2-4 record. Every aspect of my game needs work, but I guess that is a general truth for almost all players. I would like to find a way to play more regularly.
I look forward to the banquet!
Kirby wrote:Enjoy the banquet!
Calvin Clark wrote:Sorry you couldn't come this year!
Calvin Clark wrote:I think it was a great Congress.