MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pincer

Create a study plan, track your progress and hold yourself accountable.
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

My mistake.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Punishing the blunder?
$$ . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . O . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ . . , . . . X . O X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . O X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . 2 . X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]
Elf seems to think that this 2 is a brilliant (and difficult to spot) move that punishes 1 in all cases.

Seems reasonable - black gets the corner without all that pushing and the white wall (or if white takes the corner, it's small and the centre stones start looking weak)

The only reason Elf agreed with master in the teaching tool position is because Elf failed to spot the move (2 above) on that occasion. Show Elf the move and you get the same huge swing.

Does this mean that Master missed the move? Or does Master have some incredible sequence to refute the refutation?
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by Uberdude »

MikeKyle wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Punishing the blunder?
$$ . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . O . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ . . , . . . X . O X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . O X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . 2 . X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]
Elf seems to think that this 2 is a brilliant (and difficult to spot) move that punishes 1 in all cases.
<snip>
Does this mean that Master missed the move? Or does Master have some incredible sequence to refute the refutation?
That move is known to humans (but not me!), and josekipedia (citing some joseki dictionary) says it's good for white to then live in the corner: http://josekipedia.com/#path:qdodmcnepf ... rcsdsbsfra. Is that judgement usually correct or usually wrong according to super-strong bots? Or maybe this whole board situation changes things...
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by Bill Spight »

MikeKyle wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Punishing the blunder?
$$ . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . O . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ . . , . . . X . O X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . O X O 1 . |
$$ . . . . . . 2 . X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]
Elf seems to think that this 2 is a brilliant (and difficult to spot) move that punishes 1 in all cases.

{snip}

The only reason Elf agreed with master in the teaching tool position is because Elf failed to spot the move (2 above) on that occasion. Show Elf the move and you get the same huge swing.

Does this mean that Master missed the move? Or does Master have some incredible sequence to refute the refutation?
"Show Elf the move and you get the same huge swing."

This observation underscores the fact that all players are fallible, superhuman bots included. :) We need to maintain a healthy skepticism about their evaluations, even while recognizing that they are better than ours. Errors in evaluations are greatest, as a rule, in the opening.

From a scientific point of view, one problem with current bot evaluations is that they do not come with an error estimate. We would like to say that if play A is evaluated as 2% better than play B, that play B is a mistake, but we do not have enough evidence to say that. We are guessing.

Currently the focus in go bot research seems to be on producing the strongest bots, not on producing the most accurate evaluations, even though the two are related. As a human, I would find the latter goal more useful. :) Even so, I would like evaluations to come with error estimates.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Gomoto
Gosei
Posts: 1733
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:56 am
GD Posts: 0
Location: Earth
Has thanked: 621 times
Been thanked: 310 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by Gomoto »

Move a is the best if you calculate this deep.

Move b is the best if you calculate this deep.

Calculation depth is approaching infinity.

-> There is no absolute best move.



(If you have difficulties to imagine the infinite calculation depth, consider ko and an increasing number of unstable stone groups on the board all related to the status of the whole board and the game.)
Gomoto
Gosei
Posts: 1733
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:56 am
GD Posts: 0
Location: Earth
Has thanked: 621 times
Been thanked: 310 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by Gomoto »

And for all practical purposes, which of the good moves is accessible to you? It may be a very strong move, but can you handle it? :lol:

I love go, finest game discovered yet.
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

Uberdude wrote:says it's good for white to then live in the corner
I'd be really interested to query Elf specifically on some of these sequences when I got the chance, but I gave it a fair amount of time for each move in that previous continuation sequence - it seems Elf likes to threaten to live but then thinks its a better idea to strengthen the floaty outside group (in sente as black needs to deal with the corner)
all players are fallible, superhuman bots included. :) We need to maintain a healthy skepticism about their evaluations, even while recognizing that they are better than ours.
I agree absolutely.
I'm also very guilty of forgetting this attitude at times though. Sometimes I treat anyone 2 grades stronger than me as an oracle of absolute truths!
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

Bill Spight wrote: From a scientific point of view, one problem with current bot evaluations is that they do not come with an error estimate.
Yes - Absolutely, this is problematic. Also though I wonder if any metric of confidence might end up being a bit misleading. Confidence is pretty hard to come by when faced with this kind of complexity. Variance of reading seems like a fuzzy metric.

I guess our best proxy to confidence is the degree to which the win% jumps around. This would tell us that Elf is not confident in these branches
Gomoto wrote: I love go, finest game discovered yet.
Me too. And your other post is a good reason to:
The depth and complexity is such that we can get the illusion of a great breakthrough, but there is never actually an answer.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by Bill Spight »

MikeKyle wrote:
Bill Spight wrote: From a scientific point of view, one problem with current bot evaluations is that they do not come with an error estimate.
Yes - Absolutely, this is problematic. Also though I wonder if any metric of confidence might end up being a bit misleading. Confidence is pretty hard to come by when faced with this kind of complexity. Variance of reading seems like a fuzzy metric.

I guess our best proxy to confidence is the degree to which the win% jumps around. This would tell us that Elf is not confident in these branches
Actually, the researchers could generate error estimates for evaluations if they wanted to. But the accuracy of evaluation is not their concern. Beating other bots is. So evaluations, which make up only part of the strength of bots, are not tested, except indirectly, through play against other bots or self play.

Edit: This is not by accident. It turns out that improving some aspects of a bot can make it perform worse overall. Strong bots are complex. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

So one of the sources of confusion from Elf might have been a ladder that pops up in some of Elf's continuations. The ladder weakness is a pretty big, pretty obvious reason to give these reads a pinch of salt. Variation with a ladder missread here, but also there's a fun tesuji. Elf abandons the tesuji after a little bit of further reading but I thought it looked interesting.



In summary I think to play the original kosumi you need to be prepared to give away a large corner to take the outside. It seems that you can be pretty sure of this result if you choose to block at the 3-2 point choice. If you choose the other 3-2 point then you must be prepared to take the corner and fight in the centre.
Attachments
Elf curious joseki reading 2018-05-18.sgf
(335 Bytes) Downloaded 881 times
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

To look at the other major Elf patern a little..
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B The "Usual" joseki here
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ . . . 5 . 6 . 8 . |
$$ . . . . 7 1 4 . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------[/go]
What Elf likes next seems to be highly dependant on the whole board.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Tenuki is possible
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . 4 . 5 . 7 . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . 6 X 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Here Elf favours tenuki. 'a' is the best local follow up, but approaching is bigger (about 2% difference.) I supose that there isn't a very pleasing extension across the bottom without leaving a strange spacing somewhere(?)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Master and Elf agree
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 3 O 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 7 . 5 . 4 . . 8 , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . a . b . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
In this case Master and Elf agree again. 8 is just about a certainty. In this case, it seems to me that settling this group is too important. 'a' is Elf's second favourite again, but it's about 5% behind. White 'a' is followed by black 8, white 'b'.
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

I want to start looking at human joseki and different board positions and the different choices involved but it's been tough to find time. In the meantime, I have some more to add to my personal stream of consciousness about this Ai knight's move main line.

I'm at the 'Not the London open' tournament this weekend. Pavol Lisy 3p is here as the tournament pro and Uberdude is at the same venue for the UK Challengers'League.

In my second round game I got to try out my planned opening in an effort to induce this new pattern and see what people try..
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B MKyle as black, NTLO round 2
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . , . . . . . , 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . . , . . . 7 . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 8 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
White butted but then descended below 8, letting me harass the eye space and get a nice result (before making much more serious errors myself in the rest of the game.) But I was lucky enough to get the game reviewed by Pavol who suggested an interesting line..
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Pavol's line
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . O . . . |
$$ . . . X 2 3 9 . . |
$$ . . . . 1 X O 8 . |
$$ . . . . 5 4 6 7 . |
$$ . . . . . . . 0 . |
$$ ----------------[/go]
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm11 ..15 at 7, 16 at 11
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . O . 8 . |
$$ . . . X X O O . . |
$$ . . . . O X O X 2 |
$$ . . . . O X X O 1 |
$$ . . . . 7 3 . X 4 |
$$ ----------------[/go]
In a separate conversation, Uberdude suggested that maybe Elf and AG are comfortable with this because of something like...
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm19 AI is happy?
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . 4 . . . . |
$$ . . . . . O . X . |
$$ . . . X X O O 2 . |
$$ . . 5 . O X O X X |
$$ . . . . O X X 3 X |
$$ . . . . O O 1 X X |
$$ ----------------[/go]
(this is my memory of the discussion, please attribute any kyu level errors to my tired kyu brain)
It seems black must be happy to get this weird thin looking formation if black is going to play the knight's move at the start.

I'm quite interested to ask the Elf when I'm back home.
Tryss
Lives in gote
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 1:07 pm
Rank: KGS 2k
GD Posts: 100
KGS: Tryss
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 153 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by Tryss »

I think white will play like this instead :
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm19
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . O . X . |
$$ . . . X X O O 1 2 |
$$ . . . . O X O X X |
$$ . . . . O X X . X |
$$ . . . . O O 3 X X |
$$ ----------------[/go]
And it's worse for black (there's a severe weakness at S6 )
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

Ah yes. Thanks. I thought there was something fishy around my 19 & 20.

Surely black can't try to steal sente and leave this hanami ko?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm19 fun for white
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . 4 . 6 5 8 |
$$ . . . . . O 7 X . |
$$ . . . X X O O 1 2 |
$$ . . . . O X O X X |
$$ . . . . O X X . X |
$$ . . . . O O 3 X X |
$$ ----------------[/go]
And if black patches up with 22 white can either break through the gap or even just play along the bottom and let black take gote if he wants some weird thin influence.

Interested to see if this upsets Elf again. I have more confidence in master, but we don't get to ask too many follow up questions.
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

Elf is on it.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Pavol's line
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . O . . . |
$$ . . . X 2 . . . . |
$$ . . . . 1 X O . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------[/go]
1 seems to be kind of a trick play, and 2 is getting well and trully tricked. Black looses about 30% win rate with 2 for mainly the reasons we were looking at (or also white can block the other way, live by kicking the pincer stone and then a little bit later hastle the lower side group)

Elf likes:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Elf's line
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . O . . . |
$$ . . . X . 2 . . . |
$$ . . . . 1 X O . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------[/go]
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm3 Elf's line
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . b 6 . . . . |
$$ . . . 5 4 O 8 . . |
$$ . . a X 1 X 2 7 . |
$$ . . . . O X O . . |
$$ . . . . . 3 . 9 . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------[/go]
Then a is the next local move for black, or b for white, but Elf sugests that neither is super urgent.
User avatar
MikeKyle
Lives with ko
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:27 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: MKyle
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: MikeKyle Analyses Komoku, high approach, low 1 space pin

Post by MikeKyle »

John Fairbairn wrote:One characteristic of the commonest line in this joseki, which involves a lot of very close contact, is that it offers several ataris that amateurs love to play but pros avoid.
I'm confident that John was talking about this human joseki:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . |
$$ . . . . . 6 5 7 . |
$$ . . . . . O 4 0 . |
$$ . . . . . 3 2 . . |
$$ . . . . . X 1 8 . |
$$ . . . . . . 9 . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------[/go]
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm11
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . 4 X 2 . |
$$ . . . . 3 X O O . |
$$ . . . . . O X X . |
$$ . . . . . O X . . |
$$ . . . . 1 X O X . |
$$ . . . . . . O . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------[/go]
I've been having fun with go review partner and I used it to look at Elf's opinion of this sequence in 75 9p vs 9p games containing this patern (method briefly explained in the inroducing grp thread. I know that 9p vs 9p is not an exact 1-1 match to quality games but it seemed a reasonable way to get a good number of games)

It actually surprised me a little to see that Elf wanted to play this patern on at least one ocasion in my analysis. I think if Elf wrote a joseki book then this patern would be listed as a special case. Elf likes it for example in this game:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Lee Sedol vs Pak Cheong-sang
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . X O . . . . O . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X . O . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X O . . . . . . . . O . . O . . |
$$ | . . O , . O . . . , . . X X O O X . . |
$$ | . O X X X O . . . . . . X O X X O O . |
$$ | . X . . X . . . . . . . X O X . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
White ignores the pincer for a long time in this game, according to Elf, white should have played the 3-3 point sooner, but as soon as he does, the following play is exactly as Elf would have played it on both sides.

However in general, Elf likes other sequences..

First of all - the hane after the 3-3 (move 2 above.) Elf really likes that knights move! It prefers the knights move to the hane in around 50 of the 75 board positions in which the 9d's chose the hane (Elf's opinion on the remaining 25ish moves were split - not all for the hane.) It seems to most commonly be around a 4-5% mistake.

There's a little bit of noise at move 4 too. Elf mainly agrees with the popular human move, but on a couple of occasions looks at other moves - for example here:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Elf plays on from Cho Chikun vs Ishida Yoshio
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . c d 9 . b e |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7 4 1 a . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . X 6 5 X O 2 . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . 0 . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
I think Elf plays 1 as black here in order to take sente for the open corner. This patern appears in 'The 21st century dictionary of basic Joseki' on a diagram with the words "foiling the trick move" (1 is the trick move) except that according to the dictionary, black must play a and finish in gote because leaving white the ko is too good. Elf thinks that black can now tenuki and take the final corner and then (after making an outside exchange) white will turn in order to set up the ko for later. (the ko is white c, black d and then throw in at e to set up a 2 stage ko. If white started it now I think black is very happy to take 3 large points while white takes the stones.)
Post Reply